Ok I guess within a official criminal investigation being trans could be a potential clue, but what you’re talking about is a civil discussion in society, if all you know about the shooter is that the shooter is trans and that’s it, nothing about the motive or anything, what’s the discussion to be had that doesn’t involve jumping into conclusions about the shooter’s motives?

Here
Here
Here
They are all images. I fucked up the linking in the last comment. Also while I did misunderstood your initial claims on the pictures, your claim in your first comment that the shooter was “indeed Trans” is false. There’s literally zero proof that Ramos was even a cross dresser let alone transgender. Also even if Ramos was transgender why would the rest of the LGBT community need to care? Actions of a singular individual doesn’t reflect the whole group
If Ramos was transgender it’s as relevant as to what shoes Ramos was wearing, I don’t see why there’s need to be a “discussion” as you imply in your first comment

Here
Here
And Here
I would like to add that you have provided no proof any of these photos are even connected in the first place so if you have some excuse to dismiss these images, you still have no proof these are the same people.
Also the shooter was not trans, there’s literally no proof of this anywhere

Here Every tweet in this thread disproves all three images

Only the top left one was confirmed to be Ramos you moron, two of the other pics were of random trans women and one of the pics was just idiot on /pol/.
How did you fall for such easy bait?