Ok, so basically in very simple terms, I think that God is learning through us. Imagine if you built an avatar to help you experience and know about what life is like on earth. You wouldn't hinder it's process/exploration with your own preconceived personal gripes, would you? So why would He be nitpicking or so pedantic about our actions?

But while he may not judge the actions (as he's impartial - I think), we feel and judge the repercussions of those actions and can feedback information to better his plans (whatever they are).

As for the bit about the "mansions." I was speaking about our role in His plans. Why are we still here experiencing the hardships? Well, if you were building a project or embarking on a goal, doesn't the struggle that you face make you realize all the more that you got so far, and you don't want to let it go? The struggle made it all the more worth it. But the struggle also shows that you've built it before and you can build it again, if need be.

Our role as avatars can be employed meaningfully by following the "Golden Rule," where you can make someone else's life/existence a whole lot easier by treating them as you would like in kind. Rumor also has it that your future incarnations are slated by the relationships/connections you have at the present time, so if you want an easy life the next round you'll better try to make it comfortable this time round (or at least try your best to do so) for those in your vicinity (near and far).

That's what my inferior mortal mind has come up with at this time. But overall, the secrets of the universe are truly beyond me. At the end of the day I can only appreciate it. That's all.

I can explain, if you'd like. You don't have to agree though, it's just my opinion.

I don't think he would be so pedantic. From what I've gathered here, He's learning from us. In building His "mansions," the struggles and lessons are what makes him realise he doesn't want to let it go...But if He has to, He knows how to build it back up again from our myriad experiences here.

I'm sure He's seen His fair share of characters, but while He might not judge, we do. So we're in his stead as a proxy calibrating judge (for perspective). The "Golden Rule" is therefore imperative.

Haha the idiot really believed that I was an alt from my flippant comment about the funds and mental issues. Oh, now how the tables have turned (in his accusations of gullibility).

I cannot give you any credence to the expectations which you outlined, but for me, the stipulations have always been clear. It is up to us now to rise to the occasion, when permitted.

Oh, really? What were the ways that you expected things to pan out? I'm interested.

I find it quite interesting (and funny) that out of unbridled frustration, u/Decent_Rest_3705 is mocking us for reading this content when he/she has been clearly doing the same.

Hmmm...you seem to have been here for a long time (since you noticed the description discrepancy) ...lurker are you?

Since you consider us “mentally ill” and “stupid”, leave us in peace to be such then. Your “concern” is a mask you wear for ridicule.

Anyone who knows anything about analytics knows that the like to view ratio varies. This is considerably true when not all who view, like the content. It further proves your point moot about this forum being a place for followers to “venerate” a cult leader or whatchamacallit – since we don’t always even like the content.

Anytime I’ve ever taken a “professors” word for anything was when they were telling me what was going to be on a test (and that’s putting it lightly).

You should go back and read some books about the “Art of Persuasion.”

I don’t give a rat’s ass about what people think, and more so on what they think I read and believe. If this is something which I, or anyone should be “ashamed” about, according to you, then you are truly naïve as to what constitutes “real shame.”

Anymore discourse about this from you is just pathetic.

That's right. "We" are all mentally ill. We are grateful for your concern. To mitigate this situation, would you mind sending us the funds to fix this problem asap?

Your concern is greatly appreciated 😌

I'm not sure what they believe in, but I know it's not right, despite their remonstrations to the contrary.

They have always said it was for our own good that we are locked in a cage. But despite their cruel hand in influencing the worst out of us, God was always there to teach us the truth about this plane with His many sons and daughters.

God sees us as worthy. This is evident. The trappings of this world (influenced by them) have always been laid bare when He arrives. He disapproves in every instance.

I agree about the information. I wonder how they think it's true wealth, if it can be attributed to someone else? It might be that as one dies and finds themselves standing before God, that the punchline is that everything is upside down. The "highest" on this plane have become the "lowest" in his.

I love a good story about an underdog. I agree. I also think it is a valuable part of our currency.

I hope I can see it to pass one day for us.

If we don't loose our ability for empathy and love, then I think we have a fighting chance to be better. It is an advantage that has unseen benefits.

In my arrogance, I used to be outraged and incredulous at the thought that God would allow the Kayeen and others to use humans as "lab rats" and "puppets." Then I realized that God allows this, because he loves them too, and wants them to figure out how best to use the opportunities that he has sent their way and to not squander them (similar to what you said above for us, Garbo).

He sent a part of Himself (humans) to "save" them, when they were at the brink of extinction. He still does this too, until this very day.

Too bad the Kayeen don't "love" Him back. Squandering God's gift of a good and able body, for a needless genetically altered one was first indicative of that. If they didn't even like themselves in the first place, how will they like or love anyone else?

This is interesting to me, because their behavior is quite on par with someone who has low self-worth. Maybe that is why they put so much stock on outward material wealth and status - and unfortunately even then, they are arrogantly misguided.

I know this is simplifying it quite a lot, but it is interesting to me how "love" (or the lack thereof), can inform all decisions.

Well, more reason to not be sociopathic and selfish then, as your own grandma or grandpa could be amongst the crowd! You're never going to hear the end of it from your relatives and their friends. Shamed twofold! 😂

Yeah, I saw that. I was wondering too.

Yes, sociopaths can be of use but need to be curtailed. After all, they can give us perspective on both sides of the coin on what's acceptable. If everyone was good, well, God would find that incredibly boring and there would be no growth or learning.

Ok, interesting. I was not aware of the matriarch aspect to their patriarchal system. I suppose it postures good role models for both sexes; as the male discovers what he values in a mate and female figure. It helps him maintain his faith for the fairness and righteousness of women, thereby helping him gain perspective and does not induce begrudgement and bitternesss (unlike the incel mindset, I suppose, which is a tendency in our world). The female is also reprimanded and reminded of her eventual stature and standing, wherein selfish and sociopathic behaviour will not get her far in any capacity.

Hi Garbo, thank you for taking the time to answer me. Your writeup about women’s week was very informative and made clear about some details which I only knew in passing. However, your summary has brought up more questions than answers for me. From your indirect answer (via a summary of what the Naigaje women’s week is) am I to assume that a “men’s week” would be a bad idea? Would this be your answer to my question? I don’t mind if you say I am wrong, but I am interested in what you think instead of regurgitating what you hear.

My idea of a “men’s week” was largely to suggest a proverbial mirror to be placed in front of the men’s current myopic viewport, so they too, have to come face to face with the results from the actions of their own reckoning.

I am also impressed by the Naigaje(an[?])’s resolve in moulding their social structures to their own benefit and the feats which both sexes take to uphold it. I agree with you that we should do well to emulate them. I do agree we should identify and redirect sociopaths to career paths which are less likely to harm others. However, I’m not sure if their strategies can be “completely” comparable for us (human primates) though, as evidence strongly suggests that we do not live in a “Patriarchy” (currently) and have vastly different mating strategies than Naigajeans.

I’m going to be one of those annoying pedantic keyboard philosophers here, so I hope you don’t mind and will humour me…as I said before, I find this topic very interesting so I am trying to see what can be done and what cannot.

From your writeup, the consensus is that Naigajean women can be sociopaths, but in the Naigajean patriarchy “they have no path to power over society” and are therefore irrelevant to social structures/ society in general if they do not contribute for the masses in some way. As a result, they are not attractive mates, so via natural selection and pragmatism, I assume they soon die out.

My response to this, is that evidence strongly suggests that unlike Naigajeans, human women HAVE a path to power over society. Can you name off the top of your head the countless women leaders the world has had the opportunity to have? Angela Merkle, Ursula Von De Leyen, Kamala Harris, Jacinda Arden, Liz Truss, Nancy Pelosi, Giorgia Meloni, Nicola Sturgeon…the list goes on. In fact, the very person who has been touted by RD to be a fit candidate (in r/reptiliandude) as POTUS is a woman herself – this being Tulsi Gabbard. So, it is not true that like Naigajean women, human women “have no path to power over society” and should be absolved of criticism and social reform as they too are privy to bribes and selling out for gain. The ability for them to even rise to such stations proves that their sociopathic characteristics and traits do not easily make them irrelevant to human society as female Naigajen sociopaths do. Some of the women above have been embroiled in controversy and are not paragons at all, of any kind – similar to their male counterparts.

So how can we reconcile the problem of eliminating sociopaths from positions of influence for humans who are both male and female? This problem is coupled with the rise of sociopaths in the general public which like you said – “do not care about anyone but themselves.” Moreover, our wayward culture teaches, sustains and rewards it.

If we weed out the male sociopaths on “women’s week” and care nothing for weeding out of the women, how will the female cohort know WHO or WHAT to even weed out when their resolve and critical thinking is being perpetually beaten down by the sociopathic (and banal) among them (who in the modern sense are responsible for the sociopathic “woke” cancel mob?). This is what has given additional rise and acquiescence to the Trans debate. This quote in your writeup has never been more appropriate. “They could start a culture war ~~world war~~ for profit, for example. Or allow children to be sexually abused by ~~rich~~ perverts for their own amusement.

For me, it would be nice if our society was like the Naigajean’s. Similar to them, human primates are more inclined to Patriarchal structures. But this is not the case now. If we as women, deflect from even posturing some accountability, then we will be in very dire straits indeed for the near future.

As well as this, could we not propose a "men's week" too?

The idea of a dearth of sociopaths among women is nigh on a myth now, as the pervasiveness of social media has truly emboldened, marketed and sustained such behaviours. We can also see its effects all around, as we cannot deny the plight of the modern man on account of the decisions some women have made. The modern man also needs to be accountable and responsible for their behaviours on what they mutely subscribe to - be it their own destructive behaviours or failure to discern or speak out.

Both genders should be honest on what they want and on what they don't. Else, how will we unite, live easily or find common ground and understanding in ignorance?

It would be remiss to not have both sides show what they truly value in the other gender - with gender and sex being the same in this context, might I add :)

The two festivities can also be seen as a veneration to each sex; as each can show their unique proprieties, characteristics and abilities which are unique to their own. This difference is what makes them "valuable" to each other in various complementing ways. This is not to say that these are defining characteristics of each sex, but they are what abilities they are endowed to do well in, and can strive to carve a path of use for.

The modern consensus is that a woman can do "everything" a man can - which is definitely not true. But, nor can you deny the latent (and developing) abilities in the other half of the female population which can benefit society as a whole.

Full suppression is not the answer either, I suppose - as we can see from the modern over reaction of "feminists". The latest, and to us, the most "recent" incarnation of the "patriarchy" has reaped what it's sown.

Anyways I think this is very interesting! These are my thoughts.