Well the alternative would be global reign by immoral profiteers as opposed to a shift of power to those who stand against them. I see the pros and cons of both but I gotta go with the second as it is probably most beneficial im the long term for the sake of humanity.

It should be about who has it in their best intentions to represent and steer humanity forward.

Self-compassion > Narcissism

So the light from the stars is the pick, as they come in different vibrational qualities, and the notes on the cylinder are the cells that convert that light into energy?

Gonna try and pick your brain here for a second.

So my suggestion is the equation E=mc2 is bunk because it attempts to quantify the poetic understanding of light travel, which is infinity because its speed is in constant flux. For all we know, light speed is instantaneous, but appears "slowed down" in a vacuum because its path has been altered and needs to travel the currents that do not exist outside the universal vacuum.

Light doesn't change speed based on gravity as a force, it simply just appears to change speed based on the course it must travel. This being said gravity is not a force but more of a distorted space, as we are naturally more prone to move with the centrifugal currents than against them.

The light from my computer reaches my back wall and the light that reaches my face arrive at a different time. They both have the same infinitely increasing speed, but one reached the required distance at a different time than the other. So this makes it possible to measure the "speed" of light by calculating the difference in distance.

We can however move against these currents and I suppose that's where levitation comes into play?

And I figure curvature propulsion is a real thing right? The shit I read from my science fiction? Would it be possible to move through space at great speeds with curvature propulsion, the way a paper boat is propelled by surface tension from the soap via the Marangoni effect, by having the engine propelling the space around it?

So basically the development of penicillin was to immunize, but became ovverun by corporate interests. And so in order to cut costs for wide-scale market, the product had to be interfered with.

And propagandists promoted it at low cost shortly after during a time of war when it was most needed.

I guess this was the catalyst leading to what pharaceuticals is today? main access point to feminize/dumb down the public?

Not that this is a bad thing but, I kinda get the jist that the more emotional and connected to your emotions you are, the more easily manipulated you are.

By relying on emotions and not your conscious self, every bit of information your body receives is either programming yourself in some way or reinforcing something. Take music, movies, or any form of imagery for example, and just meditate on their subliminal effect on the body, without even realizing it.

I've observed my own emotional feelings listening to all forms of music -for example heavy metal to hip hop... and I can say without doubt my bodily emotions go from wanting to be angry about something to wanting to dress a bit more stylish depending on the song.

Wow ok I should probably step out of lurking range and say something about this, esp since my name is Paul and Ive been using a VPN connecting to phoenix recently. If this dude really did get his Pauls mixed up then maybe he thinks I'm you based off some of my old posts long ago finding truth in some of your observations? Either way, his detective work seems pretty half-ass if he thinks I'm in Arizona living in a shack

Did the color violet not exist back then? Or was blue just a color that was not as common as it is now? Makes me wonder about other colors that exist that we have may not come across.

I think because bandwidth is a finite thing that makes it a valuable asset which could be traded. Cryptos that utilize this could progress into something related to the above what he commented.

Could be that Newton had a handle on the basis on perception, which we right now have confused in our sciences.

Inside our eyeballs are cones that work like sensors similar to a three-chip color camera.

The ancient Greeks believed we emit beams from our eyes. Assumedly, that would be then miniscule gamma rays, which are split by a prism within our eyes into red, blue, and green components. This is how the "image" is created. The colors and brightness contrast is created by the coating of the inside with phosphors that glow when struck from behind with an electron beam. The stars would make this possible.

Also, this is one of my fav songs, so I'd been pondering this for some time:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIzDsGyxsQM

This hammered bracelet technology... is it a particle accelerator?

And what other industries besides immunities are built around humans? I can imagine there are species who would want to experience human life if they have no more room to evolve any further.

And if I were to guess, I'm sure there are many advanced species out there who lack emotions and as many personalities as we have...

Is there an industry to give other species a chance to feel these emotions that we feel? Are our emotions being harvested in our DNA somehow? Not gonna lie, I actually had sort of a "dream" about this.

Forgive me for the endless probing but I can't keep from chipping away at this… Do we live on the RING of the Moon?

Following this logic:

The universe is shaped like a doughnut>The Milky way is a type of ‘hammered bracelet’>Our galaxy exists at around the center of the doughnut>The light comes from the ‘sun’, and light from scattered stars which are brought into this universe from outside the inner ring of the doughnut>The ‘hammered bracelet’ is constantly in motion, twisting around the light from outside this universe (the sun).

Like the universe, planets share the same qualities of blood cells>The planets and their atmospheres are made of not just solids, liquids, and gases, but plasma, as they are heated up by the sun to form a “plasma” atmosphere>Plasma adsorbs (and reflects?) energy of different frequencies>The moon was a separation from the Earth, and created a cell division by an impact from a planet called ‘Theia’ (which actually might have been Mars, because there is lots of nickel and iron there as there is in the Earth’s core), and the asteroid belt also may have been the result from the catastrophe>So we are currently living on the ‘RINGS’ of the moon, with the moon being the nucleus>The face of the moon is reflecting sunlight always (from suns on both opposite sides), and that’s why we see the moon (and the reverse flipped moon if viewing from the opposite side of the hemisphere)>The rings tilt on the x axis every 24 hours and z axis every 6 months.

The effects from this would probably be:

1. The moon has a positive charge, creating a negative magnetic charge on Earth, where the magnetic forces are constantly flowing toward the moon. This charge affects the atmospheric plasma qualities of Earth, filtering out higher frequencies and keeping Earth in a low frequency. It’s probably why Earth’s atmosphere is blue and not violet alpha rays, which would contain more energy. You said the 'time before the moon' had purple skies and It seems blue was a relatively rarer color during that time.
2. The gravitational time dilation of the center of the rings is significant from that of the outer rings (the equator), meaning that the time moves slower at the center and so ‘certain’ exalted people could theoretically live hundreds of years already by residing there to stay young.
3. Some amazing song lyrics for a lot of musicians.

God damn it… I have so many speculations.

Seems the more I read on this subject the more confusing it gets.

Why do time-lapse videos and long exposure photos of Polaris reveal swirl motions of stars around it in the sky…?

Is it that all stars hang from it like some sort of pendulum and spiral around it?

Does the Earth also hang from the moon like a pendulum, causing it to speed up toward the bottom arc, and slow down at the end of the swing?

‘Bulwark facing away from the Earth’…? Ya gotta be kidding me…

At the risk of sounding absolutely ridiculous here:

Would the universe itself being like a Matryoshka doll explain the phenomenon of Ancient civilizations records of the black suns? Seems to be a yet another massive secret among the ruling class, that no one really seems to talk about.

Taking your Matryoshka doll reference, let’s say it’s true that there are layers of spheres of the universe, one inside the other, and that there are outer holes. These large holes would be how we perceive to be “the sun” (and would explain the mystery behind the black suns). The light comes from outside these “holes”, from a sea of fire. The light coming through these outer sphere “holes” also gets reflected and scattered many times in the space between the two spheres, filling it with light - this is what creates our perception of smaller stars.

Let me reiterate that many ancient civilizations had records of these black suns.

Using the logic from above, would it be possible these three “holes” in the ever-constantly moving outer layer of the universe, actually are the 3 stars Sirius A, B, and C (Orion, Betelgeuse, Procyon)? The sun that we usually see during our daytime would thus be one of these, depending where we are in the universe.

Except no one ever gave it thought that it could be all about distance: If we see one of these stars at night, it would simply be because the outer layer opening of the hole is further away from our atmosphere. The gaseous outer layer becomes transparent and invisible, and so it appears to only be a star (and vice versa if the star were shining near our atmosphere… as evidenced by the sun).

It would make sense because you can only see Orion, Betelgeuse, and Procyon mainly during the winter, meaning that their distance from far away indicates why it’s cold. During the summer you can’t see them, meaning we would be too close to one of the suns to see the other two suns.

In this sense, the suns are the players, and we are the soccer ball traveling in between them.

Hang on though: the third star would be the Super Solar Force, aka the black hole, which I assume signifies the return of all creation to it (or the creation of all things)... This is something that would align with the true meaning behind the Trinity, which HARDCORE would make some people with mainstream beliefs very, very antagonistic.

Gonna take a stab here:

The radiation zone of the sun can absorb energy photons and re-emit them like a super-powered antenna. It acts as an amplifier for radio waves, both going to and from it. Hypothetically we could broadcast radio waves to the universe with it, using the power of the sun.

From what I understand, Earth only has the capacity of 10^15 to 10^16 watts, so it would be fruitless. Using the power of the sun, it could reach capacity which would be hundreds of millions of times greater than the total usable transmission power on Earth.

Not all energy can pass through to the sun, however - there are boundary “radiation layers” within the sun that act as mirrors to reflect low frequencies and actually amplify them outward, while allowing only higher frequencies to pass through. These radiation layers are similar to the membranes of cells.

So in order for us on Earth to send a signal, it’d have to be powerful enough to penetrate the sun’s convection zone, and then be amplified and reflected back out from the radiation zone using those same so-called “energy mirrors” going back out.

The date Lawrence Welk introduced Jo Ann Castle was 1964. During that year, 6 adjacent planets had lined up with the Sun, including Earth’s moon.

My assumption is that considering that there were some massive Earthquakes around that time (1964), one of the congregations here on Earth had figured a way to send a massive signal toward Venus, which cradled past Mercury all the way to the Sun, and from there the Sun blasted the signal out and beyond. Using the above mechanics from what I’d stated above, the signal would be amplified after it passed through Venus and even more when reaching Mercury, giving it enough power to penetrate through the sun. This is because stars may act as super-charged antennas to transmit signals.

My second assumption is that the message we sent out prompted a loosening of the quarantine because it showcased our human capabilities. From this perhaps Consortium leaders made arrangements with those of us on Earth to strike a deal with humans. Unfortunately, our leaders decided to monopolize all contact with ETs and hence a deal was made… some of their tech was traded in exchange for alien abductions to be more prevalent.

The Moon screws up the signals going out and receiving to Earth, because either A. it keeps the Earth in low frequency, and causes the Earth’s atmosphere to reflect high-frequency radio transmissions just like a mirror (limiting which wavelengths can pass through), or B. The order of the planets in the entire solar system has been shuffled out of the Fibonacci sequence in comparison to the rest of the universe, thus leaving the entire solar system in an unbalanced frequency, or C. The moon acts as a low-pass filter that hijacks all the high frequencies escaping Earth or going toward Earth or, D. All of the above.

The signal could be reached from Jupiter’s moons (I reckon there was one received from Ganymede). Not sure why, but assumedly because they are of similar distance and frequency from their respective planets and thus could cradle from the moons of Jupiter to Mars and its moons to Earth’s moon then finally to Earth? (Why you say it has to resonate is beyond me, though).

My hypothesis on to how Earth’s frequencies were meddled with: the ping pong paddle of the ionosphere signifies the funneled hole in the atmosphere created by Project Sanguine (1958), when the Navy boiled away a portion of the sky using high-power microwaves to heat the ionosphere so that they could predict where their radio transmissions will end up and where they can be extended. They used this to create even deeper frequencies than VLF and ELF, heating the ionosphere with virtual antennas that resonate the deepest signals. Is this is how your listening outposts came to be?

Makes sense, as fractal patterns on wood seem to follow this same logic.

Both the 0 nodes have a white or black option, and so there are many combinations of logic gates: AND, OR, NOR, XNOR, NOT, etc... For example, if you set up rules for an AND gate it would be that the output (1) node should be black if both (0)'s options are black, and the (1) node will be white if one or both of the (0)'s options are white in a sequence. That would probably be the most foundational understanding of it.

Would Newton have been condemned to death had he shared his secrets publicly during his time? Couldn't he have shared it on his deathbed, or was there more reason to keeping it secret? I'm sure there are a select few who he passed them down to?

Considering Newton's knowledge of the motion of particles, is it perhaps that Newton knew of the original meaning behind the Trinity - that its meaning was in the lack of a closed solution of the three-body problem of particles, something he knew to be the logic behind ’evolutionary algorithms'? He knew early on that the design of the universe relies on the code of 'threes': two input nodes and one output?

The Church's understanding of the Trinity set the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as equals... but Newton knew that the Son and Holy Spirit were subordinate to the Father. The two input nodes (0's), and the one output node (1) align with this three-body problem.

He knew that God was not a machine but an intelligent being of endless calculation.

For instance, you can use the Monte Carlo method for getting close to calculating the area of irregular shapes (water for instance) simply by finding the proportions that fall within the shape compared to the ones that fall outside of it. The ones that fall inside are considered "beneficial", while the ones that fall outside of it are "harmful". So the ones which continue the evolutionary path are the former, and the ones which do not proceed are the latter. It just isn't a closed system of calculation (which is what would imply that God is simply a running machine), it instead is the opposite of a closed system.

So in other words... the Trinity was symbolic of the three-body problem but was killed by the Church (as was the cross in relation to the tesseract), and Newton knew about it but did not criticize it for the direct reasons?

Or am I overthinking this?

Edit: Also, what the Monte Carlo method implies is that the human mind and logic could be categorized as the same - in order to find God one must undergo through enough positive highs and negative lows, inward and outward thought processes to create comparisons from these dots to achieve a more accurate result, rather than collectively pinpointing singular areas.

Stars would be the pins that hold together these wavelengths, I think. The tin cans on a string, so to speak. So the gaps are the wavelengths of light between them, I reckon - maybe we ought to be looking at Newton's cradling through understanding spectral lines.

Don't forget about the Fibonacci Sequence - this blogger here also strangely knows quite a lot about this.

Also, I had been reading this sci-fi book - which happens to take place in restricted areas with a sense of realism - so not surprisingly I don't think the book is very science "fiction" considering the things I know now (If someone wanted to get the information out there without causing a stir, this would be the way to do it). It's called the Three-body Problem. Note the correlation between the Lake of Fire RD talked about in this subreddit and the Sea of Fire mentioned in the book: https://imgur.com/a/tWYs4

I think it may give some more insight on the meaning of "out of sync". There's hints scattered all over it seems.

6% already? Didn't you say 4% about a year ago? Are we really moving that fast?

You ask some pretty solid questions, man. I can only make observations. There are certain things I'd like to take more time to research and wrap my head around.

First is how whether the moon orbits around or spirals above Earth. Naturally, if the planets operate much like subatomic particles orbiting nuclei, I would originally have assumed it is orbiting around... but then again, this pattern is only what mainstream science has taught us. If we exist in a doughnut shaped universe on its flat surface, then mainstream physics simply must be understood as a reference. The spiraling would be consistent in how all matter flows in a pattern of the golden ratio.

Second is the characteristics of gravity and its effect on time-space - is it simultaneously stretching two sides of time-space in its pull (similar to stretching out a piece of cloth using two hands), or just one-sided? Is there actually a pull, or just creating folds of space-time around Earth, or both? What is gravity, really? Whatever is happening, I can only infer that space-time is folding somehow to narrow the distance of the future from the past.

But I think also that the Moon is pretty abnormal in how it exists. It has "hollow" characteristics that make it ring like a bell, and only one side always faces the Earth, unlike other planet's moons. I'd reckon the moon has a more massive effect than the sun on Earth because of its proximity to it, as the ripples in space-time are closer to Earth.

But thirdly, is being out of sync instead something to do with a displacement from the Fibonacci sequence? From my own understanding, it appears that the planetary orbits of the planets in relation to the sun in this solar system are shuffled out of order, that is, if it was meant to follow the Fibonacci Sequence like the rest of the synchronized universe might be. see here.

So maybe further away planets require more moons to keep their time-space plane evenly laid out with the rest of solar system (because the Fibonacci sequence is what keeps everything in harmony)? Maybe a strong inconsistency of the ordering of the planets is enough reason for time-space ripples throughout our solar system, which assumedly look chaotic in comparison to the rest of the universe.

This imbalance I think creates a distortion in the folds of time-space and the frequencies that travel them. Also, would probably be one of the reasons we don't receive light from other galaxies and see them appearing in the sky.

That's what I'm trying to explain, actually. Not exactly a bubble, but because time-space is folded near Earth by the Moon's gravity, our past and future are brought closer together than those who exist on a standardized plane (those without the abnormal asymmetrical pull of the Moon).

This folding of space-time creates a shortcutted distance for light to travel, making the future closer to the past than it should have originally been. And so if the past and future are closer together, that also means time is sped up -- that is -- compared to those who are living outside of this space-time folding phenomenon.

This was something I posted this a few months back, I hope it shines a light on something worth looking at:

In relativity, with sufficient concentration of energy and matter, space-time bends and contracts to such a disagree that distant locations can curl up right next to each other making time travel inevitable. Because of this bending, curling, and contraction, the distance between the future and the present shrinks; like two distant points on a map which are folded up next to each other.

For example, the distance between between Beijing China and Buenos Aires Argentina, is 12,326 miles. However, if these two cities were on a space-time map and that map was folded up such that the two cities were on two adjacent folds right next to each, then the distance, in a straight line going from fold to fold, would be much shorter.

So in other words, it looks like this: http://cosmology.com/images/7gravityPockets.jpg Like the bending of this map: http://cosmology.com/images/7foldedmap6047.jpg

Einstein’s curved universe could not be a perfect circle, as galaxy distribution is asymmetry, with great "walls" of galaxies throughout the cosmos which have clustered together. It is this clustering, and these galactic walls which contribute to the unequal distribution of gravity, which causes space-time not just to curve, but to fold and curl up and to asymmetrically effect the flow of time.

Look at the two photos together and see how they compare. The tugging on the strings are the effect of gravity tugging on the Earth to create that pattern similar to the map. Except this bending is not of distance, but instead of space-time (the grids you see), narrowing of the past from the future. This is because light must follow this abnormal curvature, which means it takes a shortcut to arrive at Earth.

To better get an understanding of this: Focus on an object placed far away from you - the further distance it is from your eyes, the the greater the time needed to reach your eyes. Find another adjacent object closer to you. This object is fractions of a second closer to the future than the further away object, because the time the light needed to travel to your eyes is reduced. If somehow the space between those two objects bends, the light does not have to travel the same distance; it instead takes a 'shortcut' to reach your eyes. So, this is how I assume the gap of between past and future is reduced.

Research Morgellons:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZbWrrMiP6g

How about give yourself some credit when it comes to researching whales for yourself. How much can we learn in a university classroom that we can't learn online?

What difference does it make if I go searching for the answer and you doing it if the internet is readily available for the both of us? And what's keeping you from believing in the evolutionary evidence of their existence?

Does it not seem like there are powers in place who are trying to steer us toward being anti-Genesis intentionally if NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM is found on US dollar bills next to occultic symbolism associated with freemasonry and Egypt?

You're exactly right. But the reasons would be to turn people into narrow-minded and arrogant atheists. This also as a result divides people to keep them from focusing on the real issues, keeps them better under control, and also diminishes their sense of hope so that they have nothing left to fight back.

If Genesis is true, then is it not apparent that mainstream history is way off base and Adam was created about 6,000 years ago and there was a global flood less than 4,500 years ago? How about we not limit all knowledge to things that are written, but is there anything written in Genesis that is untrustworthy if we weigh academia against actual unbiased evidence?

Yeah, if it's true and it's the only truth... but what if there's extra-biblical evidences that support its existence in another way? You said you aren't limiting your knowledge to things written, then why ain't that a possibility for you?

Allow me to provide the example for what I mean:

The story of Cain is allegorical - the story has its origins in the Ael’Kayeen killing and driving out humans who raised livestock in order to protect and quarantine the plants they were modifying and developing on this world. (Cain killing Abel). These people who raised cattle and other livestock posed problems to the Ael’Kayeen because they were thieves, drunk, and made attempts at raping women researchers among the Kayeen. From this, human experiments continued in earnest, and became far more important than medicines and chemical sequences developed from plant modifications.

-

How about we start with freemasonry and move on from there if that is an example that includes thousands of influencial people including presidents, kings, prime ministers, supreme court justices, governors, commanders, generals, actors, singers, astronauts, writers, inventors and founders? Is it not also known as the Craft and associated with goat images and with upside down stars in pentagons and with obelisks and even with the devil himself if you consider words of Albert Pike?

I think we had this discussion before:
https://www.reddit.com/r/reptiliandude/comments/6diczo/what_reptiliandude_is_and_what_he_is_not/dl74c1g/?context=3

I might not watch much mainstream news and have very little if any faith in mainstream science and yet have decades of indoctrination under a belt that has likely led some pull in one way or another.

Then I'd say you're on the right track toward a better understanding. But I still think the definition of 'mainstream' is vague to you. To me it means any form of information or product that is sold to the people on a very large scale. I mean, just think... how many copies of just about any version of the Bible have been sold around the world? Not that I think its completely false, just that it had become corrupted by an intelligent organization of people to keep us from discovering certain truths.

Some infinities are bigger than other infinities... as in the infinities from 0 to 2 are bigger than the infinities from 0 to 1. You can measure an infinite amount of space in 1 step as you can in 2 steps, depending how far down the scale you go to measure. The end result is both infinity, just that there are double the amount of infinities of space in 2 steps than there are in 1 step.

So if we decide to measure every number of objects as infinities rather than real numbers, 1 could instead be an irrational number like .99999999 because I reckon then everything can be continuously measured to infinity.

It never occurred to me until I saw RD's comments that we as humans currently use base 10 because we have 10 fingers total, but actually the ancient Babylonians used base 12, as we still do today with their time measurement. Now trying to understand how base phi φ or base pi fits into all of this, I'm pretty sure that's what we should be looking at.

Edit: which also begs the question from me once again... did some of our ancient ancestors have 6 fingers?. RD had said before cataclysms cause species to devolve (de-evolve?) into having less fingers.

Those links are really great. I found this one, which might help answer some questions here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=600&v=lA6hE7NFIK0

Actually it was because of this dude, which got put on reddit front page recently.

That same post had been reposted a few times already to the front page, by the way, and I realized that the front page of reddit does usually have some well-concealed form of propaganda.

I had watched him in some movies and in Empire a bit and I thought to myself: why did this guy, for any given reason come up challenging standard mathematics with seemingly no real effort or logic put into it at all?

And so while everyone accuses him of mental illness, it made me conceptualize what really might be going on: he is a Siriv and it's likely an attempt by them to confuse us from getting closer to a clearer answer. I can't think of a better explanation here.

It was from this post that I began to question that they are hiding something that might be a bit more obvious we have overlooked in our mathematics.

Hahah were you looking at the same thing?

I think we ought to share at least some similar characteristics for being out here questioning these things, won't ya think?

I'd say it's all about perspective. There for sure exists a lot of information meant to either confuse or conceal truthful facts (Flat Earth Theory, for example). My own approach toward any kind of truth has been to use as many facets of education as you can to a particular issue: philosophy (an understanding of human nature), psychology, theologies, science, music, art, history, religion, and math. Even something like a basic understanding of ponerology (the study of evil and how it develops in society) (PS, ever wonder why this isn't really ever taught in any schools, let alone a word that anyone has ever heard of, including even Microsoft Word apparently?) would be really useful to know the roots of. I don't consider myself intelligent, but one curious enough to look at something at many different subject angles before arriving at any satisfied understanding. So it's just in my opinion that quoting from the RNKJV from a strictly biblical sense will only alienate you from a better understanding of what's really behind each passage.

Neither can we take blame for our own perspectives I suppose, because that's our own past experiences. I think it is especially childhood experiences that take root in how we approach new information and process it.

When one reads a newspaper or online web article, we of course should learn think about the person behind it who wrote it, and what their intentions might be for writing it. So what intentions can you come up with for both RD and the scriptures you are quoting?

Genealogies don't reveal much without other evidence to back them up, do they? In fact, I've read there are quite a few contradictions.

A New World Order is definitely on the agenda, but you might also just realize that these long-term plans always have been. We just happen to live in a time when information leaks through, and we just never paid close attention in our histories (Renaissance, fall of the Ottoman Empire, WWII and the Holocaust). So get yourself ready for a globalized, privacy-exposed, cashless planet with ever-increasing healthcare and banking rates. After all, many people these days only need Netflix and a TV or computer to be complacent.

As it was stated here, the universe operates in cycles, so certain things are able to be calculated and predicted as I assume these things in nature have occurred in the past on other worlds. In this case, the next 100 years on Earth could probably be calculated pretty accurately based on the market forces of nature. I believe RD had even said we are about one or two generations away from a violent overthrow of our federal governments, nuclear war, and a race war. That is, if we do not answer the WOW signal.

You and I are on the same path to a better understanding, man. I think that, despite being on two separate parallel tracks, you and I have quite a bit in common. I think a lot of the information will reveal itself slowly over time, and a lot of the things we talk about here will cross paths eventually to a clearer truth.

So in this doughnut shaped universe, it is still flat on the outside, and we can not travel into the depths of it, only the outside? Kind of like how our universe is only the surface of the ocean, and underneath is the rest of the infinite whole.

And now that you explained to us that laws are simply just habits of things constantly in flux, that would mean that zero in our mathematics should not only indicate a starting point, but should also indicate infinity, as infinity is the starting point of the universe, and also the end point from the three torus model of the universe. Both infinity and zero could be described as the sum of all energy and (its return of it) in this universe.

We currently claim that infinity + (n) = infinity, but it is actually infinity + (n) = (n) because the number (n) arose as a finite object separate from infinity.

So in that same sense, in subtraction, infinity - (n) = -(n), and when you do the equation (n) - infinity = -(infinity), in which -(infinity) is the same as infinity.

When you multiply infinity and (n) you get infinity (n) times or (n) infinity times, which equals ∞, or (n) (n) (n) (n) (n)..... for the latter equation. If it was simply only 0, it would be (n) 0 times and 0 (n) times and the result would always be zero. But depending on perspective an object can not = zero if it is ever being measured.

So for division, when you divide (n) by 0 you get undefined. But if we change perspective of 0 = to infinity, we get (n) divided by infinity, which is a number that is infinitely small but still on the positive end of being a real number no matter how small it gets. And when infinity is divided by (n) you get infinity as you would with 0.

Every object has to have a finite quality, and it can't be zero. Once it is begun to be measured, there will always be something greater or smaller.

Viewed in this context, negative numbers don't exist. This would allow a radical shift of perspective so that we see the universe as an undivided whole, where every object is part of the single universe, and there was never such thing as nothing existing.

Source:

http://everythingforever.com/st_math.htm

https://tinyurl.com/ybrktsxs

After reading a North Korean defector's AMA... If you really think about it... Our entire planet is like the people of North Korea, but on a much larger scale. Those living close to the city buy into the propaganda of the capital, while only a few are able to learn of the outside world through items smuggled through or information leaking from ear to ear. Those who don't, think that everywhere else is just the same.

I remember RD has said that in their satirical sense of humor and appreciation of Earth's music, they played Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon" to those astronauts orbiting the Moon, but the space station's intimidated reaction was to state how they could "hit a target on the moon", in their own belligerence.

We are North Korea in the same sense, but at a larger scale, and with more resources. We are thankful for not being born in that situation, but primarily because we don't truly understand the status of our own. And the powers that be hoard all the information and wealth from its people. This "experiment" of a nation might just be proof of the same human nature at two different levels.

I think you are referring to the gyroscopic forces (same as how you apply a fork to spaghetti and twist it), which in turn creates/stabilizes gravity. Simply put, this is the black hole dynamics by which the Golden Ratio is utilized.

Time is the periodicity/interval which charge rotation creates, and Mass is the inertia gyroscopically created by rotating charge.

Also this phase conjugate cause of gravity might also be the cause of all centripetal forces, and in effect, the origin of COLOR.

Antigravity is when a field becomes more fractal/centripetal than the earth underneath it (gravity's debt paid).

So this black hole is in effect the source of the creation for matter, and the return of it to non-matter (or whatever it's called), I presume?

I pulled this all from Dan Winters...

It’s clear to me we are both working towards our own preconceptions here, as it’s also one of the things that had been mentioned in the video you posted. It was very educational indeed.

And excuse me if I seem to be deflecting some of the points you bring up here. I try to absorb what I can and process it in a way that makes sense with the time I have. You really do have a lot of questions and I can't really say I'm knowledgable enough to answer them all, but can get through some of what I can by reading up on them with the time I have.

So to be quite honest with you, I have no knowledge at all of that new age stuff. What examples are you specifically referring to?

Realistically speaking, in person I definitely am not that intelligent, just someone who was always slow to act and behind on things… so from that I guess over time I adapted to not act so quickly on my judgment, and instead take more time to read up on things before doing so. I also grew up playing a shit ton of video games with my brother, so I’m sure that helped.

In regards to your second question, would damage control or introduction to a new age of information make sense to you also?

I went to a Catholic highschool and took 1 or 2 courses I believe in university. I think we are in the same boat here how media has made things appear to seem like a myth, especially with a lot of over-the-top effects and mystified music. By speaking about the stories such as Genesis as though they are myths will keep more mechanistic minded people from discovering the ancient historical past of a comet striking the Earth and causing the floods 13,000 years ago. And what’s spoken more like they are myths more than our ancient Greek mythologies?

Ever wonder that maybe not all the Bible is pure fiction or reality, and that there might be some gray area rather than black and white? If a truth needed some great thought-out concealing then isn’t that the more likely scenario? The goal for us is to decipher which has been tampered with and which hasn’t been, and which ones are simply allusions meant to highlight a particular point. Of the 4 Gospels there is 1 who is far different from the others. I think we ought to reason why. Second, stating that the Lord will punish those up high only further promotes inaction by those below them. If the kings will be judged by God, then wouldn’t you think the common people are much less motivated to revolt against them?

Yes I think I did say that they evolved from amino acids on light years apart. What in particular is keeping you from believing that?

Trump & Christ…. I don’t know man… maybe you might want to rethink that one.

Regarding the rest,

No one said that Jerusalem was never destroyed or never became known as the City of David, I only stated that it was actually under Egyptian rule during those times:

The Amarna Letters were from West Asian kings (of city-states and territories) sent to Pharoahs Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten/ biblical moses). These West Asian territories were under Kemetic(egyptian) rule, which included the city of Jerusalem (which was not Hebrew or Israelite at the time).

If the intention was to conceal David’s true identity to deny any family connections between Israel and Egypt…. then what do you think was necessary to make that happen? The Stele you list here all are things that could have been created afterwards, all of which would support the theory that such things needed to be concealed. The destruction of Jerusalem would have also meant a lot of its history could have been lost forever. So these things you bring up about Jerusalem and Exodus could be explained from this, not in denial of it at all.

In Romans 2:1 it is explained that in the big picture there are only two types of people: the Godward people and the selfward people. The Godward persist in doing good, while the selfward people are those who live for themselves. IF those people who narrated the particular compilation of scriptures of the Bible were selfward people, then their intentions were to hoard all the wealth for themselves while all the rest behave and give up their own wealth to serve, and unknowingly to the selfward people above them.

…and I also would like to thank you for taking it this far because I may have hit a light bulb off in my head with these things. Sorry if I offend anyone reading this, but I think someone has to help lay it out here:

The efforts to conceal might have primarily been because the Canaanites were also a breed of Nephilim (The Kayeen), which later became absorbed by the ruling Egyptian army. The absorption of the Canaanites into this new group then became disguised as a completely separate faction with glorified stories… Israel. They did this because it would have otherwise highlighted the evil corrupted mindset these “white people” were derived from… as in, child prostitution and horrible sacrifice and Baal worship (you will have to excuse the counter-productive all-caps and over-expressive ranting here):

http://www.raceandhistory.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl?md=read;id=2456

That would also explain why half of Israel fell into this unfaithful “Baal” worship because they were tempted to follow in the ways of the Canaanites. The worshipping of this bull idol might be the reason how the “devil” came about with its horns and these satyr goats symbolism in media everywhere. Freemasons are attributed to this because they might actually be getting away with things that the rest of the world can not perceive. It is the Selfward people ruling above the Godward people here. It is highly symbolic of those people who fell into temptation to be among the selfward, and this mentality still exists today.

I would also like to point out these horrific and dark truths are generally what deters the more sensory/emotional minded people from ever believing it to be a possibility. Not to mention that racism definitely is built up among our people to help conceal these things as well.

Keep in mind RD also has mentioned that those who are susceptible to evolving mutations that have no real use for them are Dykes, Jews, and Butch. And to quote him once again from a previous question I asked him once before:

Q: Is the Caucasoid race or "white people" the offshoot of the people who traveled to and from the Moon?

A: Nope. Caucasoid race came about due to mutations caused by inadequate sunlight and bitter cold.

Keyword: Mutations

Wouldn’t you agree with me that… by how much thoughtful exchange we’ve done thus far, that this world really seems to be one gigantic clusterfuck of a puzzle?

Also:
In the game "Diablo II" your primary objective is to defeat Baal, and one of the prerequisites is to first defeat the spirits of the Nephalem at the Summit. Once you do so, you can play the secret cow level, a type of satire mimicking how those who win are the cattle herders. In order to get there, you need to gather some items, one of which is some kid's peg leg, which I think might be a sort of nod to Gouverneur Morris, one of the founding fathers during the establishment of the US Constitution (and hence likely a part of the freemasonry).

You can find other parallels to this game series:

King Leoric possesses the same qualities as Akhenaten. Leoric became undead, symbolic of how his teachings (Moses' teachings) continued on despite the fact that he was actually a heretic.

Archbishop Lazarus, an advisor to Leoric, possesses the same qualities as Phineas, the corrupted priest advisor who killed Tutankhamun (Jesus).

Albrecht symbolizes Jesus, who was the sacrificed scapegoat for their evil deeds. He was kidnapped and made for sacrifice by Lazarus. And his transformation into Diablo signifies how his original teachings became corrupted, as if it were a cycle repeating itself once again.

This game is highly symbolic... I'm sure you can find a lot more between the sources I brought up.

PS notice how the devil always seems to be wielding a pitchfork? Ever wonder if that was a deliberate design to make violent rebels think twice about their own actions?

Also note: I believe we should be motivated towards being Godward people, but ones who take action against the Selfward, rather than taking comfort in apathy.

Well... heres to hoping the rumors are true 🍻. Walt ought to bring back some of the ol' good stuff and do something about the watered down fairytale nonsense his corporation has become. Pretty sure he wouldn't have wanted to see it this way.

Not to mention: what a great way to take everybody's mind off the massive hikes in healthcare premiums and letting millions of kids lose coverage, while at the same time giving tax breaks to the extreme wealthy.

Not always apparently? What's the deal with China lashing out at ICOs then?

I could be wrong on this, but to me it sounds like China has been using the NK like cattle, building them up to start a war so that the US falls into a vulnerable trap that would result in only weakening themselves.

My interpretation is that China doesn't care what happens to NK, as long as they retaliate and strike the "head" - possibly meaning NK would land some blows in the retaliation in some manner.

I really do get how you feel about this... and I'm trying best I can to explain to you here, so excuse me if I come off lacking at all in my responses.

If you mean how mainstream media or mainstream academia are now trying to get people to question legitimacy of OT scripture by teaching Darwinist theories and Evolution, then that still supports both sides of our discussion. So the discussion here is: anti-yahweh society vs. a divided, polarized society (damage control).

If you mean how society now airs TV shows like Ancient Aliens, then that could mean someone decided to clog up the leaking dam some more with a distorted truth, or someone finally decided to implement a slow starting buildup towards the truth for our species, if not someone on the opposite spectrum working against the tide. Again, it still does support both sides of our discussion. The discussion here is: anti-yahweh society vs. either implementing damage control or there has been some agreement for the start of a new era for human understanding in society.

With regards to OT scripture, people are not talking about it at all anymore in mainstream media or academia as you so would hope. That’s what’s hankering you.

So read carefully what I type, because I am simply restating and paraphrasing best I can from the subreddit here: if it really is true the goal of the Consortium would be to keep humans enslaved as product to contain contagions and use our DNA to extend other primate species lives, then control is priority over us to make us more manageable.

From the start, religion has done more good than harm as a way to help evolve the human species faster than ever, and cost-effectively without us destroying our own selves. And now that faster communication technologies exist, especially with the internet, information has now begun to leak in ways that no longer keeps us as manageable as it did before.

So think here: what’s going to keep people distracted long enough from discovering the truth? On a large-scale, there’d need to be a well-thought out plan to shift people’s short attention spans away from discovering their unfortunate position in this universe. They knew and had it planned that people who weren’t able to clutch onto their religions eventually would fall from the trees. So the plan would be: mislead and tilt those curious minds toward the opposite spectrum without providing any brakes for discovery in the middle. Hive mind surely does exist if you observe groups of people and their psychologies. And if other species do exist outside this planet, then it’d be pretty damn likely that large-scale worldly control would also exist.

They’ve done a pretty damn good job of dividing up Americans in politics. Just look at how close the percentages come. Add in the mixture of racism, sexism, and ridiculous superficial quick-fix short-term temptations, and you’ll have yourself a distracted audience not knowing left from right. So I can see why it can be confused for a demonization by the mainstream media, even though in a nutshell it really truly is (just in a different sense than you have in mind).

Regarding David, I think you are missing some things that fly right over your head.

It is perhaps that some mischievous Egyptologist changed the w to a u, to conceal that we would never connect the name THUTMOSE to DAVID. If it hadn’t been done, we’d see that TWT translates directly to DWD, or the Hebrew Dawood.

Why is it that דוד for you only strictly derives from the meaning ‘beloved’ and has no other roots? Sure, there are others with the same name, but then why does that automatically discount the other supportive and coincidental evidence as lacking?

About Jerusalem, I’ll copy and paste the following paragraph here:

In Kemet, the Hebrews were called the "Habiru" and it was first noticed in the Amarna Letters. It is easily seen how "habiru" evolved into "hebrew", where in the Kemetic language it would have been spelled something like Hbrw, given "w" denoted plurality in Mtw Ntr and was pronouned with the long "u" sound. The Amarna Letters were from West Asian kings (of city-states and territories) sent to Pharoahs Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten,believed to be biblical moses). These West Asian territories were under Kemetic(egyptian) rule, which included the city of Jerusalem (which was not Hebrew or Israelite at the time). http://www.touregypt.net/amarna18.htm

The king of Jerusalem at the time was King Abdu-Kheba clearly showing his subservience to the Kemetic Pharaoh in his letter. You can find Abdu-Kheba's letter here... http://www.touregypt.net/amarna18.htm

What more concrete evidence of another David existing is there for you? If you choose not to connect the rest of the dots of the whole picture, then what does an incomplete puzzle reveal to you instead? It more likely means you have to use your own mind to come up with your own picture or one already provided for you.

PS don't let any of this information deter you from believing in a Creator either, as I'd said before. But I think it should just give a clearer picture of who He is.

I had just been watching some Adventure Time with a little cousin of mine, and it's funny how when I see this message I think there a some deeper messages put into this show that align with it. It was Season 5, I think it was episode 1 2 or 3, one of those.

Hold up though. I don't think the goal here should be to convince anyone of anything. Shouldn't we be having these debates to discover what we already haven't, rather than determine whether what we think ourselves to be true?

I mean, keep in mind that Yankees and Red Sox fans eternally will have something to deny, even if the scores and stats all says otherwise. And if we do end up denying all evidence, then we sure as hell might just tell ourselves that this video game world was created 100 years ago and believe that.

But reality has to have some truth, right? Because the difference between reality and non-reality is that even when we think of the reality as not existing, it still continues to exist.

And it isn't about each individual piece of evidence proving a point on its own. It is about whether or not the evidence altogether is more likely to point toward a certain direction rather than toward nowhere at all. So far it has been you denying the coincidental similarities of:
1. The name Twt translating directly into David
2. Both Thutmose III and David defeated the Assyrians and Canaanites
3. Both of them having a rejection to the throne for seemingly similar reasons.
4. Both owning Egyptian land. The ones referred to Moab & Zobah, were I believe, a part of Egypt during the 18th Dynasty.

From here, you would be able to find all kinds of clues opening up if it were truly the case. If the possibility isn't there for you, I would say go look at the consequential evidences, particularly this one that American Indians could be the result of a combination of Moors and Jews who fled the Inquisition.

Despite your great sense of reasoning and ability to have an open mind, I still just don't see how you can decide to not even attempt to piece together the things I brought up here. I know I may not be 100% correct on everything, but some of these things are essentially equivalent to believing that a tomato can only be a vegetable because it tastes like one and because you used them in salads your whole life, while all evidence points to them being a fruit.

You claim that mainstream media is not trustworthy, but yet find truth that Moses and David are exactly who they are popularly claimed to be, even when evidence is not solid enough to state who exactly they were. Am I missing something here?

PS apologies if took such a long time for a reply, I've been caught up in a few things myself.

In response to your 9/11 thread (because that thread is locked)... I assume you are talking about the Rothschild family there because the things you mention matches up with their wiki page.

And the continuation of thousands of years of conflict between two brothers fighting over stupid shit would be:

Isaac and Ishmael as you said,

but Isaac would be the son of the pharaoh Thutmose III, born from Sarah, and not Abraham as it is given slight reference to in Gen 12:18-20.

…while Ishmael is the true son of Abraham, born from Hagar.

And so over thousands of years these two bloodlines, Egypt and Israel, fought over things unbeknownst to the public for the real reasons why.

The narrators of the bible decided to cover up the histories of having any family relationship to the hated pharaohs of Egypt during that time.

So Jacob and Esau are the descendants (and I assume also are Moe, Larry, and Shemp Horowitz, since they are all brothers? That is, if you weren’t making a joke there.)

So what I get out of this, is that you are saying this might explain a lot of the reasons for certain wars in our history.

And then:

Jesus’ nickname was Joshua… Joshua was Moses’ assistant and leader of the Israelite tribes after the death of Moses… is it really that possible that he was Tutankhamun, who is currently believed to be son/or son-in-law of Akhenaten (Moses)?

I see a lot of proofs leading toward that being the case, but then how is it possible he is also considered to be this One that you so often speak of? Was he a human who revealed the cruelties in the nature of man and so thus he is considered a One, or was he considered One from the start… as in he was sent to Earth from the Assembly to reveal the cruelties in the nature of man? Are these Ones a matter of coincidences in nature among different worlds that get written in scripture, or planned by the Assembly?

Edit: I just pulled this from a blog I was reading:

The Rothschild and Rockefeller empire control the printing of money, as they own all federal reserve banks – a cartel of corporations. Only Iran, North Korea and Cuba stand against this power. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and the Sudan stood with them in the year 2000. These federal reserve corporations print money out of thin air and then ‘sell’ this money to our government keeping the system and people perpetually in debt. Our governments should be, as they once did, printing the money itself based on the value of gold. Two United States presidents have lost their lives in this fight. To defeat them we need to move to a resource based economy (see the Venus Project) and my hope is these people who enslave us will fade away. How much fun it would be to take everything away from them though. We could all be rich, all seven billion of us. I sense the ‘Bank Wars of the 21st Century’ are coming as people begin to wake up. The idealist in me would love to see a worldwide movement that raises all Federal Reserve corporate buildings to the ground, with not a single person being killed in the process. It would, in so many ways, make a great movie. We should all look at this, understand this, to empower ourselves, those whom we love and our ascendants.

Alone it proves close to nothing, but when supplemented with other evidences you are simply denying a chain of evidence as mere coincidence:

1.

Now let us look at one event recorded and attributed to King David.
2 Sam 8:5-6 5 And when the Syrians of Damascus came to succour Hadadezer king of Zobah, David slew of the Syrians two and twenty thousand men. 6 Then David put garrisons in Syria of Damascus: and the Syrians became servants to David, and brought gifts. And the LORD preserved David whithersoever he went.(KJV)
Answer for yourself: Are you aware that the same things are said of Thutmose III in prior Egyptian history where it is recorded on stone monuments that Thutmose III defeated an earlier coalition of Syrian and Canaanite kings as described in the Bible and attributed to King David? Are you aware that it is told in Egyptian stone and history that Thutmose III also established garrisons in these same regions in order to permanently secure Egyptian control there? Is this proof that these two men are the same?(Cross, "Origins of the Alphabet" in Ebla to Damascus: Art and Archaeology of Ancient Syria, p. 106, 119).

2.

When Amenhotep I died without a male heir, he was succeeded by the commander of the army who became Pharaoh Thutmose I. Inspired by previous successes, Thutmose I, now as Pharaoh, led his army into Canaan and Syria and crossed the Euphrates River at the Carchemish. After routing Mitanni forces, he set up a monument (stele) to his achievement on the north side of the Euphrates. The heiress daughter of Thutmose I, Hatshepsut was married to her step-brother Thutmose II who became Pharaoh. Thutmose II and Hatshepsut had no surviving sons. After the death of Thutmose II, his young son Thutmose III (by a minor concubine-wife Isis who was possibly of foreign birth) was denied the throne by Hatshepsut who had been married to Thutmose II of full Egyptian blood. Thutmose III, being the offspring of a mixed marriage, was not entitled to the throne. Hatshepsut continued to rule even after Thutmose III had clearly come of age (Diop, The African Origin of Civilization, p. 12). So we find in the final analysis that Tuthmose III, the son of a concubine, came to the throne of Egypt as the fifth ruler of the 18 Dynasty in odd circumstances. The dynasty has been founded nearly a hundred years earlier when, after just over a century rule by the invading Hyksos shepherds, the princes of Thebes united in the 16th century B.C. in a successful attempt to drive them out of Egypt, and Ahmosis was crowned as the dynasty's first ruler (1575-1550 B.C.E.). As we saw shortly before the death of Tuthmose II, Hatshepsut have birth to a daughter, Neferure. The normal method of ensuring the right of Tuthmose III (born of the concubine Isis) to inherit the throne would have been marriage to Neferure, his half-sister, who was the heiress. This marriage never took place between Tuthmose III (David) and Neferure. We only know that Hatshepsut continued to insist that Neferure was the only legal heir and her daughter was called "the Lady of the Two Lands, mistress of Upper and Lower Egypt". In these circumstances, Tuthmose II had to have his son adopted by the State god Amun in order to ensure his right to the throne which reminds us of the passage in Psalm 2 which is said of King David:

Ps 2:7 7 I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.(KJV)

This makes all the sense since Tuthmose III was only of half royal blood and since Egypt was a matriarchal society the throne and rulership came through the wife thus the marriage of their sisters. This brings many questions to our mind at once. Thuthmose III was not recognized as King-Pharaoh during the time of the rule of Hatshepsut, the wife of Thuthmose II.

If we follow the life of King David we find the same scenario of rejection of David as we find with Tuthmose III.

Upon Saul's death, David went to Hebron where he was anointed as king of Judah, according to The Lord's instructions, at about age 30 (2 Samuel 2:1-4). A seven and a half year civil war followed between the forces that supported David, and those that did not recognize David's right to the kingship and throne who supported Ish-bosheth, Saul's only surviving son, for the kingship of all Israel. The military and political situation grew steadily in favor of David however, and when Ish-bosheth was assassinated, David was anointed king over all Israel (2 Samuel 4:1-12, 5:1-5).

Answer for yourself: Does this account above concerning Tuthmose III remind you of the account in the Old Testament when all of Israel would not accept David as their King and only David's military might finally persuaded the total nation to acknowledge him as King as did the military successes of Tuthmose III which persuaded Egypt to acknowledge him as Pharaoh?

3.

2 Sam 8:1-3 1 And after this it came to pass, that David smote the Philistines, and subdued them: and David took Metheg'ammah out of the hand of the Philistines. 2 And he smote Moab, and measured them with a line, casting them down to the ground; even with two lines measured he to put to death, and with one full line to keep alive. And so the Moabites became David's servants, and brought gifts. 3 David smote also Hadadezer, the son of Rehob, king of Zobah, as he went to recover his border at the river Euphrates.(KJV)

Answer for yourself: Where did King David get the ownership of this Egyptian land? Could King David have been a Pharaoh?

Scholars today recognize Tuthmose III as the Biblical King David. Now I don't expect you to believe that statement but if you will read the accompany article about the identity of Tuthmose III then you will be convinced beyond any doubt that he and King David are the same person. Again we see the Biblical chronology does not match the Egyptian King list and Egyptian chronology and records that archeology has given us today but this will be a common ploy used for several reasons as we shall see as our study advances.

If the intention was to conceal the truth, which is something you very much might have already agreed with - what makes you so sure that Moses lived 500 years before David? From what I read there is no actual leading proof as to David or Moses existing outside the bible, and David's date of birth is, well... only merely theoretical by scholars.

So what is connecting the name to a face truly contradicting here, in your own eyes? If you're a detective and someone commits corporate fraud, how do you prove his guilt? By basing your theories from unknown witness accounts? What if those witnesses are helping him to scapegoat someone else? You at least have to get to know these witnesses, don't you? If you can connect a person's tattoo caught on camera to a file of a person with the same exact tattoo, aren't you essentially saving yourself from making the choice of imprisoning the wrong suspects?

Can you be more specific what Hezekiah's tunnel proves? If you believe Hezekiah's tunnel provides proof of David's existence, why would you not consider the evidence I just brought forth to you?

It's not that the book of David is fabricated entirely, but instead was likely embellished to conceal the truth of the actual true events. So there might be facts we haven't laid out yet - hence my suggestion that the Story of David might have been enhanced from other works.

I can't find any evidence of Eden existing... but if you can let's examine it.

I don't think he ever implied ד is the ancient symbol for T. The name simply ended up being based on how it appeared as it was written in hieroglyphs: twt, or as in the following case, dhwt. No one knows how ancient Egyptian was pronounced, so how else would they base it on anything other than how the lettering was decoded, and then pronounced in Hebrew, which happens to share a similar alphabet?

You can look at the actual hieroglyphs and read up on the more detailed reasons why it becomes David here

For the Finding parallels for the Story of Sinuhe:
How about starting right here at 1:24. and page 150 here

Regarding Solomon, Rehoboam, Akhenaten, I can't say for sure because I'd have to spend more time reading up on it. But if I'm reading correctly, Solomon is perceived to be Amenhotep III, the grandson of Thutmose III, so Rehoboam (son of Solomon) logically would fall into place as Amenhotep IV, Akhenaten, and Moses as they would be one and the same. Moses was the name from the Torah, Rehoboam the name from the Books of Chronicles/Kings. Again I need to read up on this, but since you're the expert - does this make any logical sense to you?

Whether Eden is metaphorical or not - I don't know. But what from those photos proves it's not? Don't many people write down their own stories and tell them in ways so that they become remembered? If a cataclysm hit Earth and people of the future dug up some copies of Edgar Allen Poe or C.S. Lewis, who is to say they won't think their stories might've been true events?

Again, I'm gonna pull in some info from the threads here for the pyramids:

Humans built the pyramids. The places they were built in were much greater antiquity than the deserts they currently now exist in. The laborers were divided up into teams and their team leaders etched or painted their victories on stones which were then set into place. Humans were more than capable of grand feats of architecture without the assistance of other species back then.

The Egyptians were a stubborn people set in their ways and highly resistant to change. They were more interested in learning about geometry so that they could reestablish property boundary markers which the Nile continually washed away whenever it flooded than they were any abstract or theoretical applications of mathematics.

The Grand building projects kept people occupied and a rudimentary understanding of how to use electricity to mystify and trick people (using florescence and piezoelectric qualities) into thinking their priests possessed the powers of the gods were an established part of this system. They accomplished this for many centuries, but at the expense of science, as they did not envision any economic or social importance towards educating the public.

The pyramids were built by Egyptian crews of laborers dragging the blocks across wet sand and the teams that made them even marked some of them with great enthusiasm. It was a way to keep lots of people occupied, though this is not the exclusive reason for the pyramids.

During the time of building the pyramids, the Egyptian government established the world’s first grand welfare system - if you were starving and poor, there was a type of porridge freely given from the granaries. You would then be registered and examined to see if you were fit to be employed in one of many building projects. For the service, these people received bread, meat, and beer. There were also places demarcated for people to live, who were assigned to the projects. The Egyptian crews of laborers who built the pyramids would mark some of the blocks with great enthusiasm.

Freemasons might have something to do with this, but I could be wrong.

Well, it seems to me you didn’t read the source I provided in my last comment then.

The first element of the famous Pharaoh Tuthmose III was always written as "twt", i.e. with 3 consonants. For some mischievous reasons the middle consonant letter was changed to the vowel "u" by some Egyptologists. When "Twt" was written, in the equivalent Hebrew alphabetical characters, it becomes "Dwd". When "Dwd" is pronounced phonetically it becomes "Dawood" which the Hebrew name for "DAVID" (Moustafa Gadalla, Historical Deception: The Untold Story Of Ancient Egypt, p. 147.

”Thut", in Egyptian, was, therefore, written as "Twt". The ancient Hebrew language, although very different from Egyptian, originally derived its written structure from the Egyptian language (Cross, "Origins of the Alphabet" in Ebla to Damascus: Art and Archaeology of Ancient Syria, 271-278.) As with Egyptian, the consonants were written and the vowels were vocalized only.

Answer for yourself: Can you guess what you get when you transliterate the Egyptian word "twt" into Hebrew? Let me give you a hint. The name begins with a "D".

Because of their similar alphabets, you end up with "dvd". If you add the vowels necessary for pronunciation in Hebrew you get David!(Cross, "Origins of the Alphabet" in Ebla to Damascus: Art and Archaeology of Ancient Syria, p. 88).

And this is only for connecting the name... there is a lot more linking Thutmose III to David if you read it.

I don’t know what bringing up the Story of Sinuhe does here - if the parallels from this story are really that strong, it just seems like this story was borrowed from to enhance the story of David. There is no known author for either, so it can easily be assumed that this ’someone’ just wrote up a narrative with using these heroes.

Amenhotep IV - Akhenaten - Moses could be the same people, why could it not? It seems far more logical than simply connecting Moses to Senmut simply only because he had the same name when he lived in the palace. How would you even know whether or not that was a common name during that time?

Gonna have to pull something from the threads here to provide for your other questioning a bit, so whoever I copy and paste this from, forgive me:

The Nephilim fit into play as being the Kayeen who created an evil state system (Canaan) whose loyalty was determined by willingness to offer child sacrifice. In that state, the Kayeen created a system appropriated by evil men seeking to subjugate the powerless and bring about a system of rule which only benefitted them, dragging behind it yet another caste system to hinder the progress of the species.

Akhenaten was a half-breed Pharoah who inhaled smoke from the burning bush and began worshipping the One. He eventually became known as Moses and led the Jews away. The Egyptians defaced his portrayals and returned to worshipping aliens. They also participated in Cargo Cults, rituals where they had human sacrifice and bled out and removed organs of each other, mimicking the Kayeen harvesting, and practiced cannibalism. This occurred all over the world, including the Mayans and Aztecs. They hoped the sacrifices would bring back the gods. The Consortium resolved to stop this “damage of product” by instructing us in funerary rituals that allowed us to continue these practices, but only after natural death. Thus, pyramids and mummies all over the world began. Cannibalism was outlawed altogether. They gave us rules to live by and offered religious orders to try to curtail us. Jesus, the Son of God, also known as the One, told them to quit influencing us negatively and to separate themselves from us. He also told reptilians to leave and not interfere. Both groups obeyed for a while, and Christianity spread.

Kayeen may or may not know what the future holds, I don’t know. But suppose you visited a friend who lived on a deserted island away from all civilization his whole life. That friend would have no such knowledge of the outside world, at all. You, however, have knowledge from so many other sources. So you could make probable calculations on much more than he could - one being that with the internet and all, you can take into account the travel navigation patterns of freight boats and those boats that will travel along the path in the future for future trades. You could then determine which boats will pass by the island, and when, whereas your friend (let’s assume has never seen a boat before) might think of them as divine steambots floating in the water with a life of their own. You could even use such 'special' knowledge to pretend you are a god among the people living there.

The things Jeremiah wrote makes more sense to me that it is not prophecy, but instead pointing out what happens to a nation when its leaders and perhaps its people lose their sense of spirituality. That is why Babylon holds many similarities to in fact many empirical downfalls in our history. So I think you are connecting some pretty loose ends here.

Glad you can see where I’m coming from, because it would completely destroy any purpose for me to have any such discussions with you if you give yourself any false impressions of these exchanges I have with you. The fact is, is that I’m here to learn as much as you are, and I surely wouldn’t have had I not connected with you.

All these concealed evidences you bring up in: freemasonry, Egyptian history, flood evidence etc, might provide you a better explanation if you take the time to not limit your sources, no? If you can use the current sources you have to arrive to where your understanding is now, why would further supplementing it with other sources (albeit ones that should always be questioned) be so detrimental to you?

C... Chelamma/Serket? Are they the same person? Makes sense as I noticed the scorpion deities in ancient times were pretty much worshipped as goddesses, not gods as you mentioned - unless you want to count Dwayne The Rock Johnson in there.

Was that a no, or a yes, or a no yes no yes noo nooo, or a yes no yes no yess yaaaasss?

For David, consider the wealth of information and coincidences here.. That is surely a treasure trove of information regarding it.

As for Moses, it seems there isn't really any evidence of him ever existing unless you take into account the possibility of the strong parallels that Akhenaten shares, especially the fact that one of his main concerns was to establish monotheism. It's not direct evidence, but it sure does come very close.

Also, because of his strange features, including elongated head, he is perceived to possibly be not of fully human blood. If such is the case, who knows what 'magic' he was really capable of? From my many read accounts on this matter, anti-gravity is seemingly one of the realms of science that those in power prefer to keep us away from learning... and apparently is a key feature for building alien craft, if you are willing to read the accounts of Bob Lazar's reverse engineering projects for UFOs.

I will say the chariot wheels at the bottom of the sea to me does seem pretty legit, even despite all the claims it's fake news.

The things you bring up about Daniel gives even more weight to the fact that he was in contact with a Kayeen 'angel' to prepare him with knowledge on things to come. I don't know what else to make of it other than that, really. I need to read more on it.

What's denying that Jeremiah didn't have his own selfish interests too? His words might bring light to these false scribes, but what makes it in a way that his intentions were purely of good faith and not in any efforts to deceive for his own benefit?

I'm not completely buying what RD is selling, but instead I'm trying to pry out from you a way to disprove the things he brought up. I'm supplementing all information together and using the logic from that to try to come to a conclusion. If you were given the opportunity to learn things beyond the human existence, why deny it rather than try to disprove any of it? I get it makes sense to be cautious, but it's in my opinion that the truth can not be evil no matter what. It is my belief that certain things can be demonized to make it seem evil to keep us from digging further into the truth. If you and I seem to agree that those in power have manipulated society quite a lot, what then is your own take on them possibly trying to get you to take the wrong side (the Kayeen angels)?

How about all this?? 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 💎💎💎💎💎💎 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 and I have this half piece of avocado 🥑 if u want too.

I think if YHWH had any bit of relationship with any of these people it would already put them at advantage to make them a saint among the common people. Think about how if you went on TV saying you spoke to God, or God spoke to you, or you heard God ask for people to do such and such, then you set up a church and perhaps your own TV show to preach or tell a story about it, all at the same time while collecting dollars. Sounds a bit familiar to me...

If any of those people had it in them to deceive for the sake of earning wealth and power, why does anything have be taken for granted? If Moses was Akhenaten, and David was Thutmose III, why would the other names not possibly be pseudonyms for those who were either kings, priests, or of those whose goal was to maintain order among a people?

If the common people had believed in a God, then why wouldn't it make sense that rulers would attempt to take advantage of people's beliefs and shape them into one that benefits these ruling class people... while at the same time reinforcing the need to believe in a God or else, for this exact reason...?

In regards to Daniel the prophet, let's not leave out the wealth of possibilities that could discredit his prophecies:

1. possibility of a work of fiction, forgery, or he had false predictions.

2. he had full knowledge because was in contact with 'angels'.

3. or he had full knowledge because he was an 'angel' himself or at least born of one.

If it's true that the Kayeen made themselves an industry out of the wealthy living as gods on Earth, then they must have had to reinforce their positions among the people somehow, right? That goes for Greek mythologies as well.

For Jeremiah, just look at the next verse (8:9):
"The wise will be put to shame; they will be dismayed and trapped. Since they have rejected the word of the LORD, what kind of wisdom do they have”

If he is attacking those who reject YHWH, then he is attacking also the critics of those who claim a relationship with YHWH. I would think this also helps his own position...

Moses could get away with a lot in terms of the morality that came forth, established from the Ten Commandments and the will of his words. That's the whole point, I would think.

Why does the plagues actually occurring mean everything else can no longer be a metaphor or story written to appease to the masses and shape their beliefs? These negative occurrences that really did happen, but given a twist or distortion to elevate certain individuals, might have even further incentivized the common people's blind faiths in such scriptures written about it. Those stories would then get passed down and give them even more credibility, wouldn't it? As you are one in case point. I believe a lot of scriptures are not so black and white when it comes to these things, and that's especially what makes it so confusing. Again though, that's my opinion so all I can do is provide a perspective. And it's not just any simple fruitless perspective - it's one that holds much more weight if you consider constant repetition of past histories of those in power and the fact that it's a part of nature to fall into temptation and want to keep a constant flow of it when you accumulate more wealth and power.

When it comes to the Gospels... wasn't one of Paul's intentions to set up Christianity, which would require a rejection of traditional methods for the sake of new ones to unite a people (Gentiles & Jews)? If the Gospels wrote based on Paul's intentions, then wouldn't that very much be the case?

Glad we are starting to see things in a similar light, even through some particular disagreements. Best to stay open minded and try to disprove any possibility here than to simply outright deny it, regardless of how ludicrous it sounds. So I say we keep digging.

1. Well.. it also explains polarizing people between atheism vs. religious fundamentalism

2. I will get to reading both the book of Enoch and Jubilees a little more thoroughly when I find the time, no doubt.

3. I mean that things become more easily corruptible when they cater to a larger audience. Just compare quality of the original local McDonald's to the franchise chain it is today as one example. If you agree that the KJV and Paul may have had their own agendas, how about consider Old Testament possibility of truth distortion then? How about consider the possibility that there may have been other more 'original' Hebrew texts that may have existed and not been found or were concealed and these contents of the dead sea scrolls instead were given by the Sanhedrin which were then to be translated to Greek?.
   I mean we don't know who are the original authors, and also the LXX and DSS seemingly existed at around the same time, so how can you put all faith into either one? The problem is, is that if we deny the credibility of the most original document in possession, then we have nothing left to base truth on. But why not supplement our understanding with an understanding of human nature and our past histories of those in power? Isn't constant repetition in world history a strong indicator of certain truths in nature? Doesn't it make sense to allow for the possibility that for whoever was dealing with such documents, they knew the scale and power it would have over shaping people's thoughts?

Let's say you have control of over 1/4 the world's population. How do you guide such a large mass of people without succumbing to distorting the truth to keep them in place? Control easily becomes prioritized over truth in such a scenario, and I imagine it would be difficult to abstain from such a sacrifice. So can you see how the truth can easily become shaped from such a standpoint?

So if one of Moses' main concern was to establish morality among his people, don't you think linking someone such as him (or anyone with important values that need to be promoted) to God would help establish order among people, regardless of how true it was?

4. The evil nonsense I refer to you rejecting is in one of my previous comments to you in regards to the masons, and the symbolic evil imagery you had brought up earlier.

5. In regards to mainstream... mainstream might even include even the earliest documents we base our understanding on, just a different time setting. Does it make sense to you that dealing with more people almost always means a greater chance for distortion of truth for the sake of profits, pleasing people, gaining praise, and maintaining control?

What's considered mainstream, according to you?

Is the RNKJV Bible not considered mainstream at all? Wouldn't you think that the greater the scale of an audience, the more easily corruptible something becomes?

And why would the two above techniques I listed not be applied for any form of sensitive truthful information to keep you away from it?

If a civilization's citizens need to be glued together under a corrupt society, how do you think they will best accomplish that?

What are the two best ways to keep people away from exploring the truth?:

1. Make it seem like it's nonsense
2. Make it seem like it's evil

Thanks a lot :D.

So from the wiki page:
Trivium consists of the three lower divisions of liberal arts - grammar, logic, and rhetoric (input, process, and output). Quadrivium is the liberal arts that consist of arithmetic (absolute and pure number), geometry (number in static space), music (relative number in time), and astronomy (moving numbers in time and space).

The Pythagoreans considered all mathematical science to be divided into four parts: one half they marked off as concerned with quantity, the other half with magnitude; and each of these they posited as twofold. A quantity can be considered in regard to its character by itself or in its relation to another quantity, magnitudes as either stationary or in motion. Arithmetic, then, studies quantities as such, music the relations between quantities, geometry magnitude at rest, spherics [astronomy] magnitude inherently moving.

These are separate elements of learning such that they encourage thinking skills and are required skills for understanding philosophy and theology. It is different from practical arts like medicine and architecture in that they are not primarily utilitarian vocations, but instead are sort of intellectual training.

So I would suppose if you wanted a quantum AI to become self-aware, you would have it learn all the fields of liberal arts to supply its fuel of logic to become intellectually independent...? Never thought of this, but I guess that's why they call it "liberal" arts then. On the other hand, you'd otherwise keep them separate in the areas of practical arts to better glue together a society I'd imagine.

This universe was designed so intelligently...

Edit: gonna add this here

Let's say we live decades into the future - and imagine that you owned in your own possession an army of 10,000 sentient robots... robots with feelings and thoughts of their own.

How would you best organize them into accomplishing something you want done? Let's say you wanted them to build your own small city. To maximize efficiency, one would probably:

1. Keep them specialized in their tasks. You don't want your house building bots to suddenly run off and play a game a baseball, right?

2. Prevent them from questioning and learning of their own self-awareness.

3. Teach them the importance of obedience and good moral behavior, and reprogram them if they go beyond that.

4. Keep them complacent and satisfied while all at the same time getting the required job done.

5. Give them something to look forward to, so they are motivated to work harder.

6. Reap what they sow - whatever benefit they create, you find a way to profit from it also.

7. Scrap all rusted or debilitated robots and replace them with newer more efficient models.

8. Do not lose control of your robots at any cost, otherwise you risk putting yourself in danger.

9. Give yourself access and track all their communication to eavesdrop on any malignant conspiring against you or your other more efficient robots.

Those things above of course are for the most mechanistic minded people, and our society has been led to think in the same way. It seems to me we are similar to robotic machinery to them, each person a tiny part in their big agenda. It's the design of our universe - mechanism vs. vitalism and materialism vs. spirituality... where would we be without such extreme contrasts between anything? These mechanist cunts already track us on our phones and computers and tablets. Who knows what else.. TVs? Microwaves? Game consoles? My toaster oven?

But I have to begin to say that I really think no one will care nor try to stop something if doing so goes outside their own comfort zone. Some people will, but getting majority of people to do so would require something major sweeping under their feet. Plato had said: "those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses."

It makes most sense to me that the problem is rooted in our corrupt currency. Waking people up has to be done through their own motivational means, not from information they would hardly readily believe or accept. No matter how hard we may try, people might just remain the same under such a lacking knowledge structure.

So a more prioritized goal here should be to replace the currency with one that motivates people to step outside their comfort and broaden their knowledge, and as a result their own spirituality. It seems to be something that requires a force of more primary focus.

What have you done???

Let me repeat: it would be ideal for those in power to keep us polarized in our understandings, so we never arrive at the real truths. Polarized in politics, religion, beliefs, culture, race, sex, everything. Can't you see this happening on a large scale?

People are generally emotional thinkers, so I would say putting in wild titles at the very beginning makes most form opinions on the article before even reading -deterring people from the truth, whereas leaving such things out would help allow them to arrive at that conclusion themselves. Be on top of the game, man - there are endless tactics to confuse and brainwash.

Why should it matter what I think where whales came from because I really don't know, as I would think this might require various specialized knowledge to even come near any sort of educated answer.

Scientists are becoming anti-Genesis because that's how they are being driven toward, as our religions have become muddied to the point of true understanding. It's what those in power want, isn't it... to keep people polarized.

Let me ask you this question. So what if Genesis were true? Does that change anything of the fact here that is right or wrong? If Genesis were true, what's your interpretation of the lessons from it? Why is it that we are not both a product of a creator and evolved entities? What can not be supplemented here to help explain it further? Are you more trusting in using logic from all knowledge to come to a conclusion, or in things written to appease to your own beliefs?

What corrupt societies have ties to worshipping the devil? How much do you yourself think the media controls shaping your thoughts and understanding of things, and how much of it are you aware of it?

There's always going to be two sides of the coin here, but let's both be aware as much as we can of the fact that it's in our nature to mainly look at the side that supports our own theories. Of course, I say this to myself also.

I read that whole article you sent - well, most of it. It's articles like these that clearly have a goal to prove their opinions above anything else, regardless of those things right in front of them. What I mean is: is why did the author not talk about what these evidences possibly could be? He just seemed to arrogantly brush it off as nonsense. Why even bother linking Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds to LSD? Maybe that knee joint did not belong to Lucy, but then what the hell is that knee joint doing there? A knee joint is still a knee joint. Why is it automatically one that belongs to a walking upright monkey in Sumatra, and where is his proof for that? Or even for Peking man for that matter... why did he all of a sudden just claim it was humans eating monkey brains? If Neanderthal man was simply just people who lived 200+ years old, proven simply by looking the eyebrow, then what's the reason for such long lifespans? And for Java man, how about we look deeper into the actual bones themselves and try to find what these teeth, skull cap, and thigh bone actually were, rather than cleaning up the desktop and dropping it all into the trash can?

I did read more about Dubios and I will agree that the Dubois story does seem a bit sketchy, but then what do you think the ultimate purpose was in promulgating the theory of evolution to the people? If it's all true about what happened then I wouldn't doubt there might have been some shady things going on either. But I would say we have to keep digging here.

And just because a mainstream source talks about something doesn't make it any less true. They might even have their own agendas by being on the first page. [I mean just look at how Dailymail words the title of this article, at the very first sentence.]
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3193585/Are-ALIENS-Growing-support-panspermia-theory-life-Earth-carried-outer-space.html)

In fact, I believe mainstream media covers a lot of things that otherwise would build up and attract attention from outside sources. Wasn't that my whole point on bringing up that whole conversation I had with you with Ancient Aliens? Mainstream media most likely has the power to befuddle things, doesn't it?

Do you think Enoch could be related to those aliens who portrayed themselves as gods in ancient times? Have you ever played Diablo2? They make a lot of parallels with these scriptures in that game, encourage you to read up on it. This would prove both your point that mainstream media is really leaning towards anti-YHWH and my point that it's being done on purpose to keep us from looking at the real truth behind it. Don't you think? Let's keep digging at it though. And I still am curious to hear your past story about demonic spirits.

About your whale theory: what difference does it make if something sounds ridiculous though. Why not examine the evidence and try and disprove it regardless of how brainless it sounds?

I don't know how dinosaurs came to be if theres no transitional fossils you can find online. But following the same example about Erectus and Neanderthals I provided at the beginning of this comment, why should an incomplete and lack of evidence verify anything for anyone? Is it ever wrong to consider the possibility that: 1. We just haven't discovered anything to prove it yet and perhaps they could be so deeply buried, 2. Certain organisms were brought to this planet from other worlds, 3. They have been concealed from our sciences for whatever reason.

I'm really not knowledgable on these subjects so I can only try. Would this answer any of your question?

About your theories on Exodus: please take a rational approach to understanding the things typed here. If scriptures became corrupted, it would have been in a way as such as this:

1. There exists certain things in our nature in this universe.

2. There were entities who came to this Earth to reveal to us these things in our nature, and they expressed to us how we should act and do good in this world, despite all the paradoxes we live under. Their acts and deeds were recorded by people.

3. Since people have always innately fallen more easily into short-term temptations with more power and money (and thus more opportunity), they began to find ways to keep that constant. In order to keep it constant, they would have to keep the good from taking what they have. That in a nutshell is an intelligent design of our universe, almost like creating 2 CPUs battle each other in Street Fighter and watching them duke it out.

4. In order to keep the good from trying to take down the bad, the bad ones who have all the opportunity decided that those entities who revealed the important things in this universe needed to be removed from people's understanding. The most effective way to do this would be to either remove such knowledge of them, make it seem unimportant, create distractions (war, sex, pop culture), blend it in with fiction that people will readily follow. All these things would empower the bad even more.

That being said, I would recommend you read what little information there currently is separating the original texts of the Septuagint and compare it to the later versions of whatever text anyone generally reads these days - including that of the RNKJV you are constantly referencing. Through my observations there are things that put Moses on a pedestal in later versions where no such thing exists in the original, very original texts. so start by looking at some intelligent online theologian exchange?

I can't say there will be no waves of deception. We are like miners mining for gold, but who's to say for sure there won't be a mine collapse? We can take the best precautions we can and be prepared for the worst if necessary, but should it really keep us from mining further?

Edit: Something I found on the subreddit here to perhaps take a look at:

• Theropods were beaten down by cataclysms on Earth. the negative mutations are evident in the fossil record as the number of digits on their hands became less and less in number: 5 is ideal, 4 is workable, 3 a guarantee for failure, 2 a death sentence, unless it had evolved with flight into 3.

• Curiosity, tool use, an omnivorous diet and the ability to carry things resulted in advantages to those with lesser tooth and claw.

• If the creature ate psychedelics found while foraging during its social development, this will effect its evolution as well.

• Creatures that learn to be creatures of fight rather than flight end up being more successful in the evolution path.

• Humans - the result of a common ancestor who left the trees and took to walking upright

• Reptilians - the result of a common ancestor of creatures like dinosaurs who possessed five digits and never took flight.

Why not at least say something like I think or according to so and so if you don't know for sure? I might say maybe and perhaps and might and ask questions a bit too much, but is there not a solid middle ground somewhere?

I'm not 100% sure - but does it really matter that much to you that i didn't for once put a question mark at the end? You can go back and correct all my grammer and spelling too if you want :D

What do you have in terms of evidence that humans are fused from genes of humanoid aliens called Kayeen and genes from a group accurately called homo erectus? What do we even have in terms of evidence for a homo erectus group itself if you consider here?

I'm glad you ask these questions because it then means I get to read up on it and learn for myself about things I might not have read otherwise, and then share it for people who are reading this.

From that link you shared, it says Sapiens and Erectus may have coexisted. So the possible non-evolutionary explanations from Erectus to Sapiens listed are genetic drift, adaptations to diet/climate, and changes in the rate of skeletal maturation, possibly from harsh post-Flood consequences.

If dramatic changes in the species is a possibility, how does that in any way deny that our genes were unnaturally fused with another species?

Evidence I have is here.

These things would also help explain panspermia here

This would help us understand RD's explanation of how our junk DNA is used to process disease information for the sake of other species:
"Genetic 'dark-matter' aka 'Junk DNA' are particles that respond to disease on other worlds, and prepare that particular species for the unknown possible emergence of the same on their own worlds by informing it through the ladder of its genes. In other words, they are plans that store information about contagions for future reference, linking to other 'like' species instantaneously across light years of space-time."

So you had some bad experiences with demons in the past... sounds awful, whatever they actually are...? But in all seriousness, why would that previous experience prove anything here (or disprove everything here) anyway? I am curious to hear your story though.

Not sure what you mean by your dinosaur question, because what evidences have you that all dinosaur types just suddenly appeared out of nowhere one day? I don't know about how whales or dolphins evolved, because I have yet to read much about it. What's your take on these things, and what does it prove?

I never said Exodus wasn't legitimate, either. Why is proving Exodus as a real event automatically going to prove Genesis as a real event? Even if it was a real event - are you sure you are interpreting the meaning behind each story correctly? How would Genesis not relate to what our near future holds, if that really were the case?

And isn't Exodus sort of explained in this subreddit...? You really ought to read the posts here, man.

but what is not sketchy one way or another if aliens show up and act like they have a plan to help us even if they act like they are against rich bankers and oil people and warmongers? What will make for a deceptive charade if there are not obviously corrupt scapegoats to point a finger at?

Why are all aliens to you automatically bad from the start? He's explained his reasons for being here. Of course I'm not putting all eggs in one basket as a lot of things told here are a one-sided source - but who am I to say RD is wrong from any of the evidences he's brought forth? It's not like I take all my knowledge purely from him, but instead use all things I learn from many sources to supplement for one another and solidify it. You might be surprised to read that I think you are helping me to do that too.

Sure he may not have the most angelic personality or sense of tolerance, but why should that make any difference to what is true or not?

And if there's an ulterior motive here, then using that logic, why should I even begin to trust someone like yourself?

Wow. I am intrigued. Thank you for this great post. It's information like this that can make someone see things never the same again.

Yeshua, Osiris, Mithra... and then what of Eastern deities? Vishnu, Shiva... Buddha, etc?

I always had this strong feeling growing up that choosing one religion had left me dissatisfied for not fully understanding other religions...

How seldom do these Yejas show up, and do they still continue to show up under the radar to this day?

How would you even theoretically know that? Aren't you putting a lot of trust in someone on the internet?

How does one come to a logical understanding about about anything then?

We are at a position in life where we don't know everything there is to know in this universe. So why not look at things that might point us toward a better understanding?

Of course we shouldn't put trust in any random person on the Internet. But if things are shared by someone that can not yet be disproven, then who am I to say it's untrue. If the logic all falls into place, then a denial of this entire logic would require denial of coincidence after coincidence of information.

So if a random person on the Internet told me he saw a unicorn yesterday, what reason would I have to believe that person? If instead that person told me the unicorn was spotted in Southern Greenland, and I was showed a picture of its skull, hair and horn and hoof marks, along with witness stories told passed from generation to generation about it, descriptions of exactly how it looked like, the type of plants it ate, the unique sounds it made, and how it interacted with people, all information shared not for any monetary gain... the safer option would be to still not believe that person, and consider it all a hoax, correct?

So I can see that it's in our nature to always choose that safer option, no matter what. Despite all evidences pt in front of our face, that's how people only come to know and learn only the things they agree with. I believe the Pharisees helped to illustrate this point in our worldly nature. So why should we consider things blasphemous without even examining the evidence? If we can't get a firsthand experience, then isn't getting a secondhand experience of knowledge better than complete ignorance of the knowledge altogether?

So it's in my opinion that the ideal scenario here would be to question why are there hoof marks, and hair, and its horn laying around on its skull, and why people start to talk about it in the first place. You do agree that there has to be some objective truth here, right?

If we believe the person who saw the unicorn's intention is deceptive, then we should ask ourselves then why do I think that way? Is it because we grew up with our own strong beliefs they don't exist and want to defend that? Or did we have a prior past experience that taught us bad things about these types of scam artists? Or is there some logical flaw within the information? Or are we resorting to our emotions to back away from it?

How many times do you think spontaneous generation has occurred in the universe if you think everyone descends from a one or more collection of amino acids? Even if you think aliens toyed with genetics, you might ultimately be thinking that death and survival of the fittest are champions of progress that helped lead to aliens being advanced beings in a first place.

I don't know. But if it's truly the case how life forms, then I believe it very likely formed spontaneously on stars all over the universe. There would probably be more life out there than we can ever imagine, but we are simply locked away from it. A survival of the fittest would pretty much be God's way of allowing evolution, isn't it?

Are you sure that the Creator did not personally make Adam without having him born from a mother? What do you consider extra-biblical archaeological evidences if you already saw a third post here and scrolled down and saw one example after another from various cultures seemingly attempting to portray Eden or things that took place there?

Again, no one can be 100% certain but let's look at what is the most likely scenario here. Your Adam evidences only give weight to it being a story, not the actual person. If you showed me his skull or even some DNA for that matter it might make more sense. It is just as I believe Noah was part of a story that spread throughout the world. Adam was a story meant to illustrate we were not created as robots that are incapable of disobedience and independent thinking. Do we not have the free will to make our own mistakes and correct them ourselves? At least I think I do, and I would certainly hope that I do. So what does sentient really mean to you?

What are you thinking when it comes to quantum computers and what is there to say about education costs? There might be scams associated with making money and keeping people intellectually suppressed even inside universities and much we can learn from simply watching youtube videos and reading stuff online in 2017 anyway.

I believe the days of sentient quantum AIs will raise a lot of questions, yet answer the mystery behind Adam and Eve. Just look at the news. We are already being warned, but it still seems no one cares, right?

I agree the internet has leaked a lot of information that otherwise wouldn't reach us, but the problem is that there is so much fake crap, and I'm sure there is a lot that is deliberate. So that's me and you needing to work together to put our senses of logic together to figure this world out.

I might ultimately be learning on a regular basis and regularly questioning what I really know. Can you quote one thing I've adamantly claimed one way or another? Do you assume I was born and raised in a family that was church going let alone a family of conspiracy theorist non-Pauline Messianic Jews? I might have actually thought more like you in the past and came to see more and more evidence for a corrupt new age agenda concerned with fallen angels trying to get people to believe they were good guy primate evolving aliens.

That's good to hear from you, as I'm also constantly questioning things too. So think about this: how did you arrive at being a conspiracy theorist non-Pauline Messianic Jew in the first place? You must have used your sense of logic in understanding the histories and science brought forth to you at some point to arrive there, did you not?

What did I say that suggested that I did not think world currencies were corrupt? Have you looked into NESARA though? If you think there are good guy aliens who are going to show up and make stuff better with a cashless society using a mark on our body or something like that, what is not ultimately a trap from deceptive fallen angels trying to act like good guys?

Seems to me you are probably just misunderstanding here. NESARA's goal wasn't about a cashless society, was it? From what I read they were fighting against it.

They even said on the wiki that NESARA was linked to reptoids, even furthering the logic here.
I read their goal was to end the income tax and implement a new sales tax - as a way to rebuild the economy to return it to a bimetallic currency. If NESARA did indeed exist, wouldn't you think this most likely was opposed by the ones in most control... the ones in charge of the oil supply and the banks? So who said anything about NESARA wanting a cashless society? Wouldn't those who control the oil and the banking system be the ones opposed to NESARA, and be the ones who want to keep us as complacently accepting a worthless fiat currency locked in oil and the banking system through chipping us? They already have implemented us using our phones as if to warm us up to the idea.

To add to this, who do you think was really behind taking Muammar Gadahfi down and slandering him to oblivion? His long-term goal was about establishing an independent gold-backed currency in Africa, by the way....

And it's not about a cashless society, it's about how that cash is earned. We earn cash these days for having specialized knowledge in a particular field. But we don't earn cash for having a unique broad knowledge, at least hardly ever. We often times don't earn much of anything from sharing things new and unknown to people... and so our people are dumbed down and our evolution becomes easily corruptible. How about you and I work together to change that?

RD has mentioned to us about ideally forming a currency that has a tangible knowledge-based quality, as in one in which even a poor African child can earn for drawing a picture.

So please tell me: what good do you see in this world if you see none in someone such as himself?

Didn't I already answer this question? We were fused from Kayeen genetics with Erectus. We did not evolve directly from apes.

The ones who evolved directly would be explained by this:

Stars don’t truly die, they transform themselves into less powerful forms of greater complexity and use. Their desendants ‘burn’, and become the forges that temper an iron that makes silk possible. Fusion was their cocoon, and carbon is ours. The echoes of their great song are all around us (vibrations).

The ratio of conversion of mass to energy is .007. This enables stars to form, to burn at a consistent and productive rate and to pump out the elements so that life can form, albeit with difficulty.

I don't have the specifics on how this works, but I'm sure if you go looking for it you may find some answers. So similar life forms can spontaneously sprout on other planets.

Who has said anything that a secular POV has to deny a Creator? I never denied a Creator, nor did I deny anyone the right to believe in one. So what do you mean by "kind of" believe in a Creator? He just might not be exactly how we think He is.

I typed that quote in myself, before which I said "who in their right mind would accept such a vulnerable, unfortunate position as a possibility?". Is this not a natural human response? And where is your claim of disproof for this?

How about what extra-biblical archaeological evidences are there of Adam and Eve or even Abraham for that matter? Don't many people tell stories and write them down as a way to teach a lesson? You're missing the point of what might further explain Adam and Eve. They weren't created as perfect beings, as automated robots. They had a choice to instead take the route to be imperfect beings, and so grew out of them a free will and sentience from the errors they made. So what have you to say about quantum computers, and their currently theorized possibility of becoming sentient as we ourselves are?

If any of us are capable enough of expanding ourselves to a broader field of knowledge, and are still able to keep up with modern media rather than turn against it, I believe we all would better understand truths hidden within this world. Why do you think education costs are so freaking high? I'm glad this has been pointed out to me that it's a damn shame people are primarily rewarded for a specialized understanding than a broader one in our society today.

But the fact of the matter is that I am providing explanation after explanation for you here because it seems you've already made judgment before reading the material here. And I am taking the time doing this because I know there will be many others who come across this that will resort to the same emotional responses before finding any form of truth.

I am helping to share these things so that you can find middle-ground explanations, and not take any extreme or opposing side. These prophecies might be things that have been calculated by advanced beings, basing it off of probable calculations in the nature of people. Several things are lining up in our lifetime but do you ever question beyond what you already know about it?

If you read the posts here about currencies, you'd have well understood that our currencies are corrupt with all signs pointing to obvious, clear as day. So please don't make senseless accusations - you'd only end up deceiving yourself if you believe that the truth can be evil.

Edit: I believe one of the main points you are missing here is this: there is good and evil in all species. This type of paradox just happens to be a part of nature. Some might commit less or more evil than others simply based on their genetics. But the ones who we might consider more malevolent would be the ones who benefit directly from us, and they are the ones most closely related to us.

We should do good regardless of what the Bible or other religious text says, even though it's in our paradoxical nature to also hold us back from that. We really must have something inherent in us, within our conscience. But not all people listen to their conscience so that's when these texts come in handy I would think. And genetics could possibly play a huge part in this role; certain religions may be more suitable to different people based on their genetics. So I do see the Bible and these other religious texts as having other separate purposes. We are a major investment for these species to build us up. But who in their right mind would want to acknowledge such a vulnerable, unfortunate position as a possibility?

And I had meant these religious texts have their way of preventing overthrow of our own human government by its own people - and not overthrow of other species. Advanced beings would be the ones trying to evolve and build us up by including cautionary barriers in these texts as a means to not completely destroy ourselves. However, the ones steering us away from it would want us divided and not unified, otherwise we would have greater chance of fighting back to earn our freedoms if we are ever to learn of their existence. They want us as property for their own interests, not as people on their same level. They want people like you and me to stand divided in these beliefs, so that we don't ever stand alongside one another to fight back. That's why you keep seeing this anti-genesis buildup, alongside with further distracting people with easy temptations and excess drives of dopamine intakes from our technology and conveniences. No one wants to go out of their comfort zone anymore.

And so if there are advanced beings in this universe, would it make sense to you that they would be able to calculate at what technological status a world stands at, at particular time intervals? If they have progressed many other worlds, wouldn't you think they are capable of building us up and bringing us down if we happen to screw up along the way in our evolutionary progress? And supposedly be able to calculate when the next asteroid is planned to hit, or when the quarantine they placed on this world will be lifted? Do you think it's possible they are experienced enough to have taken very similar and yet carefully precise measures to unify and evolve other worlds? And when I say advanced beings, I do not omit Jesus from this either.

As it does not specifically state the age of Earth, the Bible initially has its roots of Earth being 6,000 years old by calculating mostly from biblical figures' genealogies. How much extra-biblical proof is there of these people existing? What if these were just metaphorical figures or just not real people, simply meant to help illustrate lessons in morality? It seems to me that only mainly kings, priests, and pharaohs in the Bible have been confirmed to have existed based on archaeological evidence, while all the others remain a question mark. So keep in mind that leaves plenty of room for tampering of this knowledge, particularly the ones who are purported to have existed closest to the days of creation.

And that gives just as much reason to doubt its authenticity as the reasons to doubt all scientific evidences currently used to date our world, doesn't it? So it stands for me to not fully take either side until we have something more concrete to base our understanding from.

Regarding a lot of the passages, I think you and I are seeing a lot of things in parallel with one another, never crossing over. I really think you are nitpicking far too much on prying these things out, but I will try my best to make explanations from my own observations, as it usually helpful to have more than just one perspective, right?

Matthew 24:14

To me, this reads as unifying the entire world, while the end could signify the end of the quarantine. It would be unifying us in a world to further continue our next step in our evolution, ending our days of being primitive beings.

Daniel 12:4

To me, this reads to keep these things as a secret, as people will eventually become knowledgable enough to figure it out on their own, as we supposedly are right now - well, sort of. That's what they would want right? - for us to figure it out on our own, because our currency and histories should be made as our own, not made by other species. I think that is one of the purposes of the quarantine.

Nahum 2:4

Again, would it make sense that those other than divine beings might also be capable of calculating and forecasting the technological progress of the entire world?

Peter

The scoffers are people who are too stuck up to care about anything out of their own interests.

The fathers that fell asleep would signify the Assembly and their lack of involvement with the world. We play our world out on our own.

I don't have much to say about 3:8... Possibly that 1,000 years for us = 1 day from their perspective due to asymmetrical discrepancies of time in our universe. Or could it maybe be just a metaphor for time not being a barrier of God?

Hosea

Doesn't seem to reference anything about a timing of return. To me, it just seems to be referencing death and life, and getting to know God through all forms of knowledge. He will know about your efforts seeking the overlooked truths, and only through this would he make any acknowledgement to us.

Barnabas

What if that was meant to be the amount of time given to lift the quarantine of the world, as it's stated in the posts here? Yet it only states from the creation of the world, because our knowledge of previous advanced civilizations prior to a cataclysm would cause people to understand their own realities in this universe, right? Think of how peoples' overall perspective in society would change if we knew of the cataclysms that impacted our previous civilizations. Insecurity and hopelessness are two things that come to mind.

The Talmud Sanhedrin link you provided would in fact help explain it even more.

Matthew 24:7 would be Jesus illustrating the laws of our human nature, and yes I agree with it wholeheartedly that our world is getting close to that point in our current lifetime. But if your only source is these biblical texts, I believe you are only limiting yourself to a narrower perspective.

Allow me to paraphrase here taken from one of the posts here - for your own explanation:

If we can speak in real time, we will be given a voice. We will be asked if we have a currency, and we shall support our currency with their own. Our entrance to the Assembly will be assured, and our quarantine will be lifted, and all Ael’Kayeen influence will be exposed and routed.

It explains it is around this year because we have roughly 40 years to answer the Wow Signal from now. To get further into explaining this, I again would say you really need to read these posts.

Again, let's try to take the perspective of those in control here: what's the best case and most believable scenario for keeping the common people from attempting to overthrow those in power, while also keeping them complacent with an extremely wealthy and corrupt government? And what's more cost efficient for them than a sustaining form of self-governance? In their perspective, don't you think that these were the people who had to have thought this through at every angle, so as to keep people like me and you from questioning and seeing through their smoke and mirrors? They had to design a butter that keeps all the breadcrumbs together, even though a few still would happen to fall off. And just look how well it has been working out for them, even right up until now it seems.

I'm not saying there is no truth to the Bible, as I think it does have a lot of points of revealing human nature - that's why I think it gets so confusing. But when it comes to points in guiding humanity toward an unfortunate level of complacency, that is something I think ought to be questioned... and it's this blending of truth and aims for constant power that is what I believe is the reason for all these confusing endless variations in translations, interpretations, and resulting denominations. I believe the King James Bible among other versions became corrupted. It was, after all, compiled during a time of government, was it not?

So I don't think of these passages as blowing their cover because they list nothing in specifics, only that they will be judged. So I'm not saying they won't be truly judged in the end - but as long as they give the common people the impression that the ones in power will be justified for their actions, people can rest easy regardless of how evil those in power may act, and regardless where they themselves stand, since that's their complacent sense of justification.

After all, people tend to already understand government is in more cases than not rich folk with power and advantage. If they will already be judged in the end, why bother attempting an overthrow? Don't many people still have this mindset to this day?

Second point - When you say "little to nothing in terms of civilization older than Sumer and Ancient Egypt".... do you forget to consider that there are those in charge that would not even want you to know of civilizations that existed prior to Sumer and Ancient Egypt? And where else would these ancient civilizations be if areas became flooded and submerged in water? So please consider underwater cities of Pavlopetri (Greece) and Atlit Yam Haifa (Israel), and Dwarka (India).

Though I've only seen a few episodes of the show, it's not clear to say whether Ancient Aliens was something pushed forward by benevolent aliens and then became slandered or by those planning it all behind scenes to pull tricks on us - but I am going to presume it was produced by those pulling tricks, as some of the things on that show seem quite edgy - and even they created a game app using that same stupid meme. Anti-Genesis and reject Christ? If it's run by the ones who want to maintain control that's exactly what they would want, so that we remain polarized in our understandings. But the posts you read here I wouldn't say are anti- either of those, you might say they instead help explain Genesis and Christ with more logic than that show ever would.

And basing from from what I understand from the posts on this subreddit, they (the Consortium) are gathering proof that we are a species that is too emotional and lacking the capabilities to try to make sense of the evidences that get put in front of us. This popularized show would be an addition to their collection of proof that it is we alone who bring ourselves down, thus furthering their reasons for keeping us as property. I think it would actually help them build a case against our own freedoms.

However, there are a lot of things in our media, especially in video games (especially Skyrim), that make reference to things as if to subconsciously implant it into our minds, as if our young generations will need a ramp up of information to understand these things before they are ever revealed to us. I believe there must at least be someone in the works of building us up in this sense.

If then, you admit that our interpretations are not our best understanding, don't you think there's a chance we might be misinterpreting some details? Or even the details about the real intent behind these passages?

And what if what you posted was written and compiled by Luke in a way to keep us from committing evil or to keep society in control by connecting with the psychologies of the common people - and as a result keep them from wanting to gain power? Ain't that a possibility too, considering that you believe that our knowledge and evidences may have been suppressed?

And in order to disprove of the second theory, then what have you to say about crater impacts at Lake Cuitzeo in Mexico and the Greenland ice sheets? Or the pileup of information leading to advanced civilizations existing in the past?

And I think we ought to examine the mainstream media from their perspective a bit. Let's be logical here - why would they possibly allow the airing of shows like Ancient Aliens on the History channel?

From their own standpoint - what's a better way to maximize disbelief and confusion for people than airing a show on traditional network TV as an outlet for the media, and then meme-ing the crap out of it to make it appear like its all just nonsense? Just google Ancient Aliens, and look at what comes up in google images if you see what I mean.

Again, from their standpoint, what could possibly create more disbelief than putting pot-smoking hippies together with aliens? Ayy lmao, right? We really do see a lot of references to pyramids, Atlantis, and aliens in pop culture, as if it were a way to dumb it down and keep us from ever questioning it.

Don't you think it will feel like the media is hiding something even more among a larger scope of society if there is a buildup and spread of leaked information only accessible via the internet? The media already gets a lot of mistrust from more open-minded individuals - so if you put yourself in the media's shoes - what's gonna help to confuse these people the most? It makes more sense to me that allowing these shows to air is simply damage control for them, keeping us from understanding our own reality.

I would agree that I think the media wants us to be leaning away from an ultimate creator - but not just purely out of evil intent, but more as a way to keep us under control and keep us from examining things we should be examining.

I don't doubt these explanations at all - I only asked you to read deeper into the things here so that you can actually supplement your own assumptions. Because I think you are pretty much answering most of your own questions, but are disproving nothing here. That at least seemed to be your original intention I thought.

If evolution is something that may not clearly be stated in the Bible, then what gives you the impression that you ought to rely on the Bible with such literal weight then? If there are such important things left out of the book regarding life, how much more of a puzzle would you think this world really is?

Or is it in there, just not interpreted to our best understanding? If that's the case, then how much more in that book is not interpreted to our best understanding?

Let's move on to the bigger question here... which scenario has more concrete evidence pointing towards it:
A government covering up the fact that the Earth is young so that we turn against God and fall into temptations as they desire,

Or

A government covering up the fact that extraterrestrials guided a comet into the Earth which destroyed previous advanced human civilizations, to keep us polarized in religion and atheism so that we never question our own reality of it all.

I will try and take your perspective on these things as best I can to understand it.

Well, to be honest with you, I guess I'm just not the one to be asking these awfully detailed questions. I can only make the observations from my current understanding, and I'm not a scientist. So I suppose this is the point in the conversation where I say "I don't know", because I really don't wanna befuddle what's truly correct with my own arrogance. If you can find reliable proof online where all proofs lean towards uniformitarianism, then I encourage you to keep digging at it with the knowledge you get from here.

So I think it's a good point that I would have to read up on myself.

But my question for you is: does uniformitarianism/catastrophism and creationism/evolution really have to be that mutually exclusive to you?

Your Earth's recent creation theory can't alone be proven just because some dino's may have coexisted with humans. You'd have to go through denying coincidence after coincidence in our sciences (math, geology, physics, astronomy, etc.) I wouldn't doubt that academia may have been tampered with in chronological dating, but I think more as a way to make us think that advanced civilizations never existed and that we are the only existing ones to have come about into this universe, to keep us away from determining the realities of our own situation. I side with this theory more because there is ever increasing evidence of these advanced ancient societies existing and our world being hit by a global cataclysm.

I didn't know anything about the Kayeen except from the things I read here. It's unfortunate it's the only source I can rely on at the moment, so I can only make sense of what's provided here. I would assume they evolved from primates over millions of years as RD has said his own species did from millions of years of evolution from dinosaurs. So yes, they would have the similar bipedal features eyes and nose as we would, assuming because we are derived from them.

So I would suggest you read the posts to get a better understanding. You'll learn from here that the Kayeen have been wanting us to deny a creator and fall into this form of polarization of religion and atheism, as a way to keep us divided. The conspiracies that certain aliens, or fallen angels as you might say, want us to deny a creator would be verified in this sense. And it makes sense if our blood product is the direct supply for expanding their lifespans. You'll find lots of references to this in the media, particularly vampire contents.

There has been no denying of a creator here, no attempt at a cult following, and nothing here has yet been disproven (although there have been some false attempts made to conceal the evidence of the Wow signal). That is why I listen.

There is a deeper alternate understanding if you read all RD's posts. This is one of the reasons I reckon he cursed you out for not reading them. Since it is relatively a lot of content, allow me to paraphrase what he said about it here:

The floods would be the result of the comets that struck Earth's northern ice sheets 13,000 years ago. The story of Noah is one story part of a grander mythos incorporating many names and many methods for preserving life on this world. It is a metaphorical story and is one of the reasons that the cataclysms that struck Earth are not taken seriously by mainstream archaeologists.

Your other questions I'll get back to you on, as I am in a bit of a rush to get to a meeting

I get that you are warning to be cautious here. I feel sad because I really do understand your perspective, and it really does show how sheathed the truth is, hidden behind endless deception. I know lots of people like you, many close relatives and friends. I think you are already a step ahead a lot of them by even looking for answers beyond the Bible. And I think it's unfortunate these types of debates are never played out this far - it's always early on someone storms out.

RD has made it clear he has no agenda, does not want a cult following, and has a "gives no fucks" attitude toward everything. So i don't think false Messiah is on the agenda here. Perhaps you still might argue that it is. Evil or not, the things he talks about here all have a logical flow that hasn't yet been disproven in our sciences (AKA dark matter, junk DNA, crop circles, time constraints, fractals, instincts, subatomic particles, etc.) and in our histories (Gobleki Tepe, Wow signal, boksops, areas hit by cataclysm, certain things portrayed in the media). If in your mind the truth can be evil, then I can only say you're limiting yourself to your own comfort zone - that's why so many people are so accepting of that. It would without a doubt be the better choice to acknowledge it, and try to make sense of it and try to disprove it.

And I have to say you bring up a good point but only from a biblical perspective, one that I hadn't really heard of, but it doesn't disprove anything RD has said. And I don't get what you mean outside of the Creator. Everything somehow, one way or another, has to be part of a creator's creation, doesn't it?

I read the article, and appreciate you sharing that. I wouldn't doubt that, with evidence, humans and perhaps some or a very few dinosaurs may or could have coexisted at a certain time. Or it could mean we were capable enough to understand what they were at one time.

Even if determined to be true, this would only explain their coexistence - it doesn't in any way explain that the world is 6,000 years old and was caused by a supernatural flood, does it?

I think we should ask this question to dig deeper: Is it possible that some or a very few dinosaurs could have survived through cataclysms and lived simultaneously with humans? And if they did, don't you think it would make a huge impact on their thoughts of them, creating artifacts in respect out of the stories they got from seeing them?

Also, if they didn't coexist, but if humans previously lived in advanced civilizations as RD had mentioned, wouldn't it also be possible they had the capabilities to know dinosaurs existed long ago?

I believe RD's posts state humans existed for over 200,000 years, not a million. So far we have discovered proof to 130,000 years prior, just recently.

He didn't say we stem from evolving from a collection of amino acids, but instead that humans were created by the fusion of Kayeen and Homo Erectus genetics. He said the allegorical concept of Adam and Eve was created by the Kayeen.

But I mean if you're asking what I believe -I've simply been digging for the truth, and that's why I'm on Reddit here in the first place.

I'd just give him some patience and hold off on the boot, garbo. He'll be one of the many millions if not billions of people that require it, if the information ever were to unbury itself. These people may end up having the same questions, and it's better off having some information out there that can allow easier access for them to relate to their questions.

I'll tell you what suggests to me otherwise:
He has openly stated he believes in a creator, and a believes in doing good deeds for this creator.
He has shared with us things in our science and histories that can not be disproven.
He denounces those who commit evil, especially those with greed in power who have driven the common-people toward a relatively unfortunate position of debt.
He highlights problems in our society that should be addressed. Things both on a large scale and among us individually that without doubt bring down the standards of how a people should be.

If you are to question he is a wolf in sheep's skin, then every single person on this planet ought to be questioned as well. Even you.

What could possibly be his long-term evil plan by sharing such information? What then could possibly be your evil plan asking me this question?

Another thing: what knowledge outside of the Bible do you have that would supplement your theory? You do realize that if the Bible has been corrupted in our understanding then you have nothing left to back up your claim, right?

I'm not nearly qualified to be a philosopher, so to ask me these questions I can really only answer with my own logic. I am simply just someone who is very observational for these types of discussions. So don't just take in what I have to say with a blind credence.

I would say that avoiding to seek out the truth is a choice to live within your own comfort zone, regardless of where that truth comes from. I don't think there's such thing as bad knowledge if it helps us understand the truth - but the means we take to obtain it and what we do with it might be bad. Learning things for the sake of doing good without being tempted to do bad I imagine is one of the purposes.

If hypothetically then a demon were to contact you, your job would be to determine who exactly this "demon" entity is, and whether what he is saying is truthful, rather than simply take in and believe everything that's been said. The same goes for complete evasion of it altogether - unless you know for a fact it is putting yourself in danger, you risk losing a clear understanding of some truthful things if it turns out this demon is not as you had initially understood. This exact same concept is often used in RPG video games. I suspect it's something our youngest generation will have understood better than anyone else.

RD has said there are some things that were not meant to be learned by us. Doesn't mean the knowledge behind those truthful things are bad, just might mean it is something deliberately kept out our grasp so as to keep us constantly searching. In fact I think I agree with him on a lot of things. There was one instance he brought up about how one of our purposes here was to water the gardens of God, which might be considered as "using our free will to do good deeds". I simply can't see it to be any other way unless there is no creator - but how can this universe exist with such an intelligent design without a creator?

Same can be said for your own species. Glad you are here sharing with us.

Man, all I can ask of you is to get to know the things you don't know. All knowledge is good knowledge - the only problem we seem to face is that we all have this impaired ability to apply logic to understand the most objective explanation.

That being said, you need to learn to not go basing your conclusions on the things you grew up with. Same goes for myself. From my understanding, our early minds as children are fragile and very easily shaped into believing things we don't understand. Doesn't mean these paranormal things you speak about aren't true nor isn't complete nonsense either, but there might be a deeper and clearer explanation behind these things if you take the time to go looking for it. Just talking out of my experience.

When you say, "mine is a pragmatic species" - that's exactly the problem then, is it not? You limit yourself to your own general species way of thinking, just as we might be the same limited to our own general species way of thinking. On top of that, we have been driven against our will into this sense of complacent comfort.

Because whether your species is or is not pragmatic - how would that One prefer for you act then, in your honest opinion? What is truly correct then? To be a slave to your own genetics, or one who can look past them and use your free will to find hope among a species that got lost on its way? Isn't that why you're here in the first place? Isn't this exactly what you've been bringing to table for us, for us to re-examine ourselves in such a way?

So I suppose then the point is that this lack of firsthand experience on the matter is what makes it difficult to tolerate these opposing beliefs. I can't put myself in your shoes because I haven't experienced those strangely awful struggles you've gone through to be here. I wish I knew, and I can for sure say it sounds like you've been thrown into a fishbowl with shitty toilet water. We grew up not realizing it or being taught that - so what else can you expect for the majority of us? We simply have no opportunity to put ourselves in your shoes, so we are seriously limited in our thinking.

But when you say you can not expect any depth of reason or understanding from us - it's like saying this is like teaching cats to speak English. But it isn't - the fact that there are already some of us who are listening to your words shows that there is possibility for many many others to listen, regardless of their current beliefs. If one cat can learn a few words of English, why wouldn't the rest be able to?

All I am saying is that the approach toward these pompous atheists and religious fundamentalists might require something more powerful than only information you provide them in order for them to begin seeing the light of things. Something as powerful as a sense of understanding of their positions, and a willingness to listen to what they have to say, regardless of how idiotic they may portray themselves.

I think even complimenting their efforts on what they took to understand what limited information they have, and supplementing it with something they can contemplate on tends to be the best approach. At least that is how I have taken myself up on these conversational exchanges... so I'd like to ask... why should this not be the ideal approach?

After all, you even said it yourself that a common belief is what binds other species together. Is it not true that this common belief could instead be substituted with a built up common empathetic understanding of one another, regardless of who they are?

What upsets me is when people waste my time with superfluous arguments. Or in other words, arguments pulled out of their asses.

Don't mind me stepping on your toes here, but isn't it a bit unfair to say such a thing to those seeking out the truths through one such as yourself?

I mean, not everyone here is brought up with the same education and values as you. A sharing of knowledge to someone of less understanding requires a sense of humility, no? Although we are not children, is the concept not the same for teaching one who seeks new knowledge? Especially for those brought up under the institutions of religion, don't you think taking an empathetic stance on their understanding of the world is far more superior than one that is condescending?

So far I don't think anyone here has accused you of being a demon - nor do I think has anyone chosen to worship you as one. And I know both are far from being correct. I think most of us here are simply seeking to put faith in the Truth, and you have been quite the superb dude to highlight and explore things unknown to us - these things that can not yet be disproven, and these things that those in power do not want us to learn.

So regarding the ones who most likely will accuse you of being demons among them all - don't ya think that these people would require the most patience and tolerance to spread this wealth of knowledge? I mean, isn't that one of the goals for being here? For such a person to even be stepping outside his/her comfort zone to communicate with you I would say is rather bold if I had grown up with their same religious upbringing.

I saw an interview on youtube a long time ago before talking about this exact same thing - getting chipped. It was in this interview that opened my eyes to the evils of people in power.

https://youtu.be/YGAaPjqdbgQ

Over 1.5m views, but still doesn't really make any sort of dent in society at all. Seems everything that goes out of the scope of people's understanding nowadays is slapped with a conspiracy label to be given negative connotation, and conspiracy theorists are memed and slandered to oblivion. Not to mention the fake outlandish conspiracy theories that as a result become created to confuse people. That's why I imagine Alex Jones has the shit reputation he's been given, especially here on Reddit.

I'd hate to be one to use one of RD's analogies here, but these tactics really are as if it was a form of placing a barrier to keep the herd in line.

Are most Kayeen all very similar like that in personality then, or just mainly the ones on this world?

I am curious as to the scale and variety in personalities of other species in comparison to humans.

Would it make sense that humans have so many more different personalities possibly by the fact that we've been tampered with by many other species, as I recall RD once stated before?

I remember hearing about this Apophis from a song - in the lyrics of a heavy metal band Enter Shikari, their song called Zzzonked. The lyrics go like this:

Mate! Please, accept this invitation
So i can take you away

Cos there’s a one in 40 thousand chance
That asteroid Apophis will collide with the Earth in less than 20 years
Oh, my god

Ahura Mazda, whose name means "wise lord," was the most important god in ancient Persian mythology. When the religion known as Zoroastrianism became widespread in Persia around 600 B . C ., Ahura Mazda became its supreme deity. The Persians considered him to be the creator of earth, the heavens, and humankind, as well as the source of all goodness and happiness on earth. He was known to later Zoroastrians as Ohrmazd.

Ahura Mazda appears in Persian art and texts as a bearded man wearing a robe covered with stars. Dwelling high in heaven, he had the sun for an eye. In the Zoroastrian religion, Ahura Mazda was associated with light and fire, the emblems of truth, goodness, and wisdom. He created six divine beings, or angels, to help him spread goodness and govern the universe. One of the most important angels was Ahsa Vahishta ("Excellent Order" or "Truth"), the patron of fire and spirit of justice. Vohu Manah ("Good Mind") was a symbol of love and sacred wisdom who welcomed souls to paradise.

RD: "I'll bet if you were to take a 'bite' out of one of the Sun god's doughnuts, you'd look around and conclude that your 'Odyssey' placed you in the center of the universe."

So I think you are saying... If we were to travel to the edge of this doughnut-shaped universe, we would end up back at the center of it? That means the light from constellations could actually be arriving from the opposite direction than the direction we view them.

And the light brought into this expanding universe... comes from the center (the eye of God), while everything else is a reflection brought about from that light.

So in order to answer the beacon... it has to be on the correct 'curve' so-to-speak within that spinning doughnut, on the same curve in the waistline of the universe as the Earth, otherwise it will be significantly more difficult to answer... right?

Am I grasping this correctly?

Edit: doughnut-shaped universe might look something like this:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/Bryan_Brandenburg_Big_Bang_Big_Bagel_Theory_Howard_Boom.jpg

or this:
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080523/images/news.2008.854.jpg

"Two rungs going right turns"

Right-handedness.... Most of us people are right handed, and are left brained.
Chimps and bonobos are mostly right-handed.

Orangutans, on the other hand... no pun intended... seem to be predominantly left-handed but are also sometimes right-handed. This might explain their more 'contemplative' social life compared to chimps and bonobos.

There is also a strong correlation between left-handedness with a curved fifth finger, elongated third toe, and two hair whorls. I don't know if this has anything to do with orangutans, but is something I came across.

Left-handedness perhaps might be a factor that contributes to open-mindedness and a more atypical brain function and so I suppose this tended to be more discouraged in society because people being right-handed meant they were less likely to raise questions and more kept under control.... maybe? Just my observation.

I am left-handed, left hearing, but right side for everything else. I'm not exactly sure why, but might have been caused by an early trauma to my head in an accident. Garbo has told me she is left-handed as well.

In China, left-handedness has always been extremely discouraged, yet many Chinese I have come across have always taken the time to note that they think I must be a clever person when observing my left-handedness when I write. Almost every goddamn time too. I guess it really is a rare trait in this part of the world.

I have also read and myself have witnessed that many people of the Jewish faith are left-handed. Though this statistical information seems to be seriously lacking. Not sure if this is just a myth or not. A lot of Hebrew scripture was also written from right to left, which could explain that.

Am I seeing some sort of connection here with orangutans and a certain type of people, or am I looking too far into it?

'C' sounds like a highly intelligent species because it seems they are ambidextrous, capable of using both sides of their brain simultaneously - that is, if they are so capable of reading in both directions at the same time.

In relativity, with sufficient concentration of energy and matter, space-time bends and contracts to such a disagree that distant locations can curl up right next to each other making time travel inevitable. Because of this bending, curling, and contraction, the distance between the future and the present shrinks; like two distant points on a map which are folded up next to each other.

For example, the distance between between Beijing China and Buenos Aires Argentina, is 12,326 miles. However, if these two cities were on a space-time map and that map was folded up such that the two cities were on two adjacent folds right next to each, then the distance, in a straight line going from fold to fold, would be much shorter.

So in other words, it looks like this:
http://cosmology.com/images/7gravityPockets.jpg
Like the bending of this map:
http://cosmology.com/images/7foldedmap6047.jpg

Einstein’s curved universe could not be a perfect circle, as galaxy distribution is asymmetry, with great "walls" of galaxies throughout the cosmos which have clustered together. It is this clustering, and these galactic walls which contribute to the unequal distribution of gravity, which causes space-time not just to curve, but to fold and curl up and to asymmetrically effect the flow of time.

This is the source I've been reading: http://cosmology.com/TimeTravel1.html

Edit: To again quote RD: "Beacons always travel in pairs. One sends a primitive signal, while the other one years behind it holds up a jar of moths made of hydrogen."

I have scratch marks from just scratching my head so much on this. So if I am understanding correctly, it is the excited spin characteristics of hydrogen that is the answer to the signal because it holds properties that go beyond space-time to carry the primitive signal with the message instantaneously through the dark matter highway. If we try to send the signal without the hydrogen line, it simply wouldn't reach because it can not travel through the dark matter instantaneously. But why is it necessary to send this signal years before the hydrogen one?

I wonder if that means we also live shorter lives, die faster too.

Just look at how long people used to live in the Bible (before the days of the moon). Hell, they even were able to give birth at 90+ years old.

To quote RD:
"Digits and the ability to manipulate objects and to follow ones curious nature makes a big difference when it comes to brain development."

They may have been a more advanced species, supposedly many thousands of years ago, as could also have been the case for some other four fingered/toed creatures.

'Out of sync'

I've been pondering this from so many different angles what it could mean.

Something to do with the tides, the gravitational pull from the Moon, I reckon because he mentioned it before. It keeps us out of sync, whatever that means.

Those who are in sync but are living on the same world:
Are they living in a separate plane of existence and then return to this plane when the moon fades out? That would certainly be a proximate explanation for our werewolf stories.

Man... it's these type of things that really do keep me up at night

I just want to point this out from the game I've been playing Talos Principle recommended by u/ACuriousHumanBeing. This game is a puzzle game massively full of deep clues regarding our history and sciences, and relate to a lot of RD talks about here. One of the messages in particular really stuck out. The message was titled Orangutan.html:

A medical journal has published a startling new theory about last year's sudden, shocking extinction of the orangutan [see our award-winning video of the last orangutan at this link]. They suggest that the virus responsible was not a new mutation, but a very old one - an ancient virus buried until now in high-latitude permafrost, set free by global warming. The virus may have plagued the ancestors of the modern great apes more than one hundred thousand years ago.

Several important questions remain unanswered, including &$%§& /// ERROR /// more importantly, the study suggests that, based on samples taken from locations around the globe, the &%%$& incubation period may ///

Could this possibly be one of the reasons why global climate is being politicized?

And...

Another thing that just hit me: Orangutans. They have 4 fingers. RD had said before that when cataclysms occur, certain species tend to lose a digit. They are also referred to as a "man of the forest" in some languages. Do you guys follow what I'm saying...?

Edit: And I am gonna go as far as to say that the Nephilim are the modern day Sasquatch, the descendants of the genetically enhanced humans that were built to be warriors. I am a bit reluctant to talk about that though because I have a feeling credibility is gonna go down hard when bringing up topics such as Bigfoot.

Edit2: Turns out there was some truth to that virus after all:

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26387276

https://science.slashdot.org/story/17/05/04/204206/dormant-diseases-frozen-in-the-ice-are-waking-up

Fuck...

Correction: Orangutans have 5 fingers, not 4. Same for chimps and bonobos

That sounds awful.

If these cases do exist, and LSD is capable of doing such things, then there has to be a science behind what exactly causes this to happen in the brain. Remember, there always has to be a science behind these things happening - it would be too partial and lacking to say it was caused by mental illness coupled with drugs.

Without digging deeper, it's like saying Harry Potter magic spells have no science behind them (if they were to exist, that is). This skewed thinking is incomplete. Magic can simply be defined as our lack of understanding of the science behind what is truly causing those spells to occur.

That being said, I read an article that could possibly show what happens to the brain in such a scenario:
https://www.google.com/amp/io9.com/5286145/a-harvard-psychiatrist-explains-zombie-neurobiology/amp

And...

By the way, I noticed that there was also another recent attack by someone who wasn't on bath salts either, instead ingested something in his garage. He happened to attack a couple at random and began eating the dead man's face:
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.syracuse.com/v1/articles/19118796/florida_zombie_attack_austin_harrouff_flakka.amp

This is my problem with this type of journalism that it does not touch upon the core details of what in the brain could have triggered such a scenario.

Edit: I did a bit more research and many articles try to put the blame on flakka, another type of bath salt... but another article said it wasn't found in his system. So, they still don't know what caused it.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/flakka-what-is-it-florida-face-eating-attack-zombie-drug-austin-harrouff-a7195871.html

One of the resulting awful things from this was that a lot of people focused entirely on race, because the kid was white and the police shot the last cannibal years ago who happened to be black. As if race is the only factor in every scenario. No one cared to even try and diagnose what the hell really happened. Is it just me, or does this seem a bit backward?

If it was hallucination, why is it here triggering such a strange case of cannibalism?

I remember there was an attack that happened, I think in Miami, several years ago. The one where some dude killed a man and started eating his face... that one. I remember the media claimed he was on bath salts. I've since wondered if there was any deeper truth behind that event.

In Egyptian mythology

In Egyptian mythology, the stork was often associated with the ba or personality, the unique individual character of each human being. The ba or soul was represented by a bird, usually a stork, with a human head. The Egyptians linked the migratory behavior of the stork to the soul's departure from and return to a sleeping human; they also thought that the ba could return to the body of a deceased person, because that was its rightful home.
Thoth was one of the most important deities of the Egyptian pantheon having gifted hieroglyphs to the Nile people. Nevertheless, he remains a mystery – sometimes depicted with the head of an ibis and at other times with the head of a baboon.
Thoth was seen as a great mediator; between man and Gods and between the Gods themselves. It is he who intervened in the climactic battles between Horus and Seth, healing the injured so that neither God gained the upper hand. Consequently, he is frequently shown waving a towel in front of one of their faces, applying Vaseline to cut cheeks, and washing their gum-shields.
His representation as an ibis (a stork-like bird) is symbolic of intelligence and learning since the ibis dips its long curved beak in the mud much as a scribe dips his pen in ink. This beak therefore meant that Thoth was revered as a possessor of great wisdom and admired for his ability to eat spaghetti gracefully. As the nocturnal, intelligent baboon, Thoth is a representation of the Moongod, hiding his shamefully swollen buttocks from gaze by emerging only at night.
The book of Thoth: More than any other except the Book of the Dead, one spell-book was revered across both the Upper and Lower Kingdom. Celebrated in the popular song "Tell me, who wrote The Book of Thoth", this seminal tome contained only two spells. Reading the first aloud enabled one able to understand the words of every beast. However, the Book of the Dead warned Egyptians against doing so, advising that “Animals rarely speak of anything save the possibility of being given a tit-bit or having their tummy tickled”. Reading the second spell enabled one to bring the dead to life. Again, sacred texts warmned against invoking this spell saying "The dead rarely speak of anything save the rudeness of current generations and the possibilities of being given some brains to snack on."

In Greek mythology

In ancient Greek mythology, the stork was actually a symbol of stealing a baby and carrying it away. Gerana, a beautiful Queen of the Pygmies, was changed into a stork by Hera, one of the goddesses whom she had made angry. As a stork, Gerana tried to abduct her own child, Mopsus, whom she loved, but was constantly chased away by her former kin.
The constellation's odd name of Ophiuchus derives from the Greek roots ophis (serpent) and cheiro-o (to handle). As for Hygeia and Panacea, they were Aesculapius's daughters. Although not represented in the sky, like their father, both have long been patron saints to modern-day physicians.
King James I of England, who reigned in the 1600's, referred to Ophiuchus as "a mediciner after made a god," because the Serpent Bearer was often identified with Aesculapius, who, in Greek mythology, was originally a mortal physician who never lost a patient by death. This alarmed Hades, god of the dead, who prevailed on his brother, Zeus, to liquidate Aesculapius. In recognition of his merits, however, Aesculapius was put into the sky as a constellation. The association with a serpent may have come from the belief that, by shedding its skin, it is rejuvenated.

Unlucky zodiacal member?

Interestingly, during late autumn the sun, moving along the ecliptic, will be in Ophiuchus for 19 days. It enters Scorpius on November 23, leaves a week later for Ophiuchus on November 30 and enters Sagittarius on December 18. Thus, the sun is in Ophiuchus more than twice as long as in Scorpius, an "official" zodiacal constellation.
Ophiuchus on the other hand is not recognized by astrologers as one of the traditional houses of the sun, perhaps because it would be the "13th sign" (an unlucky number?).

In medicinal culture

The association of the serpent (Serpens) with this constellation, Ophiuchus, may indicate the miraculous powers which are ascribed to snake-charmers. Before medicine became a science the role of the physician and priest were combined in many cultures, and existed in what we know today as the witch doctor, shaman, or medicine man, and the earliest snake charmers were traditional healers. Their aim was holistic healing, the healing of both mind and body. They used herbs, potions, charms, incantations, exorcism, magic, divination, and prayers, in their means to establish the cure.

And to this day, the symbol of the medical profession is the caduceus insignia of our Army's Medical Corps which is a winged staff with serpents twined around it.

From reading about that book of Thoth then relating it to these 'witch doctors' I get the feeling this also has something to do with our zombie legends, similar to how our vampire legends are about the Kayeen in ancient history.

It seems as though zombies are coming increasingly more popular in pop culture as time goes on. Countless movies, books, video games, and even TV shows based on zombies have dated back to 1932 when the first feature length zombie film, White Zombie, came out. But have you ever wondered where the images and ideas of the reanimation of dead people came from? Rising from the grave, rotting, pasty, green skin, an uncanny taste for human flesh and brains that can all be ended with a blow to the head. As far as how exactly the people came to zombies varies, but the characteristics described earlier usually stay pretty constant.
History shows that this idea dates back to the 8th century. The word ‘zombie’ is said to have come from nzambi, which in Kongo means ‘spirit of a dead person’, or zonbi, used in the Louisiana Creole or the Haitian Creole that represents a person who died and was then brought to life without speech or free will.
Voodoo folklore contends that Bokors, Voodoo priests that were concerned with the study and application of black magic, posessed the ability to ressurrect the deceased through the administration of coup padre—coup padre is a powder that is issued orally, the primary ingredient of which is tetrodoxin, the deadly substance of the notoriously poisonous fou-fou, or “porcupine fish.” According to lengend, “a zombi(e) is someone who has annoyed his or her family and community to the degree that they can no longer stand to live with this person. They respond by hiring a Bokor..to turn them into a zombi(e).”
Once they had been issued the coup padre, the subjects being prepared for their descent into zombidom would appear to die insofar as their heart rate would slow to a near stop, their breathing patterns would be greatly subdued and their body temperature would significantly decrease. The public, thinking that the person was dead, would bury him/ her as if they were a corpse. They would then be exhumed, still alive, by the Bokor and, although their physicality remained intact, their memory would be erased and they would be transformed into mindless drones. “Though still living, they remain under the Bokor’s power until the Bokor dies.”
Remains thought to be zombies have been found from evidence that they have been decapitated, or had their brains removed. Victims of zombies have been found with signs of human teeth marks on the found bones. You could say it might be cannibals, but traditionally they will ‘prepare’ their meals with knives or other tools, hence no teeth marks.
Some people even have said that the Mayans were destroyed by zombies. Reports of widespread cannibalism at the end of the Mayan civilization suggests something much more sinister than a simple drought or cross-tribal dispute. Bones found in and around Mayan cities show signs of being violently ripped from their sockets, and chewed to bits on the spot. Evidence has even been found of children eating their parents, and entire villages devouring themselves within a matter of days.
Found in Syria, evidence suggests that the Stone Age heads were originally buried with their bodies intact, but then after several years they were dug up and their skulls were crushed and separated from the rest of the skeleton. No one knows why the face-smashing and careful removal of the heads took place. Some say it could have been because the people of the area were trying to prevent the dead from coming back to life.
The act of putting gravestones on top of had apparently come from the fear that the dead might come back to life. It started by placing rocks over a fresh graves, keeping the dead from coming back out of the ground.
What we know as zombies today is largely a myth, but there is a small amount of truth.
Voodoo and witchcraft were a huge part of the Haitian culture, which produced ‘zombies’. Whether or not it actually works doesn’t matter, here is where the saying ‘mind over matter’ comes into play. People were given the terotoxin and soon believed themselves into becoming a zombie. From there, the rest of the story comes together, with money as a motivation, stories were changed for the people’s pleasure.

Trying to connect the dots here... but I don't really see it...??

I also wonder why Ophiuchus is left out of the zodiac? On the NASA page it just says the Babylonians picked one for the hell of it:

But even according to the Babylonians' own ancient stories, there were 13 constellations in the zodiac. (Other cultures and traditions have recognized as many as 24 constellations in the zodiac.) So the Babylonians picked one, Ophiuchus, to leave out. Even then, some of the chosen 12 didn't fit neatly into their assigned slice of the pie and slopped over into the next one.

Our planet is dying... faster than ever.

https://goo.gl/images/uetYHz

This is what happens when close-minded people of power lack foresight and are unaware of their own destruction. We run this planet to its grave.

It might help to even imagine our planet exists as a fine way to warn other species and show them what happens when we allow such things to happen.

Here's a note I just came across in the game... gave me chills when I read it:
http://imgur.com/nwqidlM
My username is based on this exact quote at the end.

And then a psychological profile based on a test that described me exactly:
http://imgur.com/a/HFjHG

And then these profound messages:
http://imgur.com/a/C3Er9

http://imgur.com/a/5fKQh
http://imgur.com/a/xcBmA

Thank you for introducing this game to me. It is adding more and more meaning to the dream I had.

You're right - the universe may be asymmetrical, meaning that time is asymmetrical (meaning that it isn't the same everywhere).

I bring these things up to explain that the Moon and its strange gravitational characteristics in how its phases might actually play a part in consciousness and time. And, the moon's gravitational pull on Earth is in fact asymmetrical.

The moon might make possible a preconditioned ability for certain people to anticipate and plan for future courses of action before they even occur, leading themselves to higher probability of success. These people are in a sense ahead of the times. Though not always accurate, it is like the weather; the closer the future is to the present, the more easily the probability can be calculated. If there are people with such vivid abilities, imagine what those who have the technology for such things are capable of. They practically could run the world, which is a scary thought if they lack a conscience.

This might also explain the ability of foresight. While it can be claimed everyone has this, we can argue that some have it better than others - the most successful people - even successful criminals for that matter, could be said to have this.

I had read previously about psychology tests that were held for children - one was an exam where a select large sample size were each given one cookie. Those who chose to wait a few hours before eating it would be given a second one, while those who decided to eat it right away would not be given a second one. It was determined that the kids who had the ability to hold off on eating their cookie for a second one ended up having more success in their lives many years ahead. Meaning, their consciousness was more capable of traveling ahead into the future, instigating them to follow it to put off their present instincts for the future. This might be an example of minor precognition, which may be affected by the gravitational pull of the Moon.

Observers, regardless of what planet, solar system, or in what galaxy they reside, are continually moving though space-time, often at different velocities and effected by varying degrees of gravity, and all are continually coming into contact with different times which are effect by velocity as well as the consciousness and emotional state of the observer.

Consciousness, therefore, must somehow be affected by the different phases of the moon and the different phases of pull from gravity. Perhaps the gravitational pull of the moon in relation to Earth could affect one's thinking when born in their DNA. Because of this bit alone, our personalities and modes of thought could be affected by this alone. This could signify there has been some truth behind horoscopy. Either that, or it could serve as a node to pull one out of sync to see the future and then back in sync depending on the phase of the moon.

And then there are those who are continually out of sync with time, perhaps stuck behind it, unable to plan ahead due to themselves being controlled by time. Those whose actions are made without considering the consequences. Those who can not see their own futures a few months, let alone a few days from now because their minds are simply not able to perceive the probabilities to come. Some of these people still find their way to success and power from inheritance.

I should really meditate on this some more...

The future is like the weather, with the ability to forecast the weather decreasing in accuracy as time and distance from the present increases. In other words, and because of entanglement and classic concepts governing “cause and effect”, the future is not already determined but is in flux and subject to continual alteration. The act of observing and other forces related to cause and affect alter the quantum continuum and continually change the future as it approaches.

I don't see how I would have been caught up in war... I'm pretty firmly against it. Intrigue, I don't think so either... doesn't sound like me. You must have been tuning in to the more distant stations, nobody watches those channels.

Yeah, but also because the truth is strange. It gets stranger the deeper you go. There needs to be a a sloping level of information that gets out, starting with the most believable topics.

Are you the only one in your family to have experienced these types of dreams? I am curious as to whether it is genetic or not.

Edit: Sorry I did not realize I sound so self-serving with this question. I really am just curious. I am also asking because I believe being de-synced might have something to do with ADHD, and not living in the 'now'. Probably not as out of sync as those with precognitive abilities.... But then again I drift off too much

https://www.reddit.com/r/ADHD/comments/5l5mct/adhd_and_temporality_a_desynchronized_way_of/

Lol. Wasn't sure what response I was expecting

A time traveling consciousness will also experience time as speeding up or slowing down depending not just on acceleration and gravity, but emotion and neural activity. The distance between the “present” and the future decrease because of the shrinkage of space. In consequence the time traveling consciousness gains access to information in the future more quickly than other observers.

These same principles can be applied when traveling great distances across space to other stars and planets. If the journey takes place at near lights speeds, the space-time traveler may visit a distant star and then return home still fresh and young whereas her relatives and friends will have grown old and infirm and may have already died.

The future, past, present, and consciousness are entangled within the quantum continuum. The future exists before it arrives and some people consciously perceive a future before it becomes the present; phenomenon which can be classified as evidence of entanglement and which are variably experienced as deja vu, premonitions, and precognition and which would only be possible if the future already exists, and if time is a circle.

http://cosmology.com/ConsciousTime111.html

Precognition - the ability to see things happen before they do. At least that's what I think you are talking about..?

And thank you, m'lady, for creating this space for me to vent my curiosities :)

Because of gravity, time-space can also be bent backwards in a circle, as happens with whirlpools and eddies along river banks where water flows in a circular motion. If the implications of Einstein’s field equations are correct, then the river of time is bent round in a circle and it has no ending or beginning and may include pockets or vortexes of time which pop in and out of existence like vortexes and eddies along the river banks.
Einstein’s time-space curvature coupled with gravity and the principle of repeating patterns, and the concept of close-time-like curves, raises the possibility that space-time is like a spiral staircase, so that when circling round at 360 degrees one does not end up in the same space or spot where they began, but above or below it (Buser et al. 2013; Gödel 1995). From the perspective of the Time Traveler, this spiraling circle can lead to the future or the past, or to multiple futures and pasts which may coexist, in parallel, side by side.

So in other words, it seems you have the tech to catch a glimpse of the future or past or even other probabilities that might occur.

One heck of a giant read, a scientific treasure trove of information about space-time and consciousness. I encourage anyone seeing this to read this and dissect it:
http://cosmology.com/ConsciousTime111.html

By the way, when you said "you" almost let it slip by, that "you" would have been too caught up in war and intrigue... did you mean specifically me? Or the entire human race? I did not think to put these thoughts together when I read that.

Yeah, agreed. Come to think of it, maybe it's probably best to talk about these things at a minimum here. Wouldn't want to muddle up truth with highly abstract concepts that we only experience individually.

So that's it then. Our brains are being communicated to, because they are a chamber that is easily accessible for them to communicate to us safely... through images. We just need to pay attention to what the dreams might be trying to tell us. It's difficult to interpret because they often come as images that we just brush off or forget quickly.

Two weeks ago I had a dream that I was talking to my very religious uncle about the Bible. At some point in the convo I decided stupidly that I bring up extraterrestrials and how I had been talking to one. His reaction was not good, predictably accused me of speaking to a demon. Just as he said that, the lights started flickering and something starting moving behind the curtains and it scared the crap out of me. We were both so freaked out that I tried to apologize to him as I was waking up. I woke up trying to say "I'm sorry". So, my interpretation of that: do not throw pearls before swine (metaphorically speaking, I don't consider anyone to be pigs). I suppose it could also be a trick played by someone to get me to believe they are demons, or just an illustration of how we rely so much on our emotions in making judgment.

There is something else I noticed just very recently within these few weeks actually - it's if I close my eyes and concentrate hard enough, I can see images of fractals and this fractal "tunneling", as well as certain random objects that might appear before me. Last week, while awake but eyes closed, I remember vividly seeing about 50 or so very black spots that look like cells, moving around in a sort of very fast time-lapse motion, breaking some kind of stone locks, one by one. And the angles of vision actually move around, much like how a camera would move. I don't do drugs, at least not for a while - I only very rarely do smoke marijuana. But it is similar to what you might see when you get super high I reckon.

I have only done it twice so far for multiple minutes at a time, and when I do it, it is quite uncomfortable because it takes serious concentration, and it feels like my eyeballs have to be rolled pretty far back while my eyes are closed.

Edit: those stone "locks" I could vividly see also had some very detailed inscriptions on them. I also can not see these images whenever I want, it seems to happen at random.

I don't mind taking a bit of brain strain if that's what it takes... I encourage you to share!

Googled it and I found 52 steps here:
http://www.world-of-lucid-dreaming.com/52-ways-to-have-lucid-dreams.html

Do you basically follow all those steps?

That is interesting to think about. Since we've been discussing dreams, I'm trying to wrap my head around what lucid dreamers are. I've read that a lot of gamers and those who do meditation are lucid dreamers, and that those who have experienced lucid dreams before may make up roughly half the population in the world.

Maybe it makes sense in the fact these people have more strongly developed a connection to the soul, and so they have better access to travel back to the heavenly database to create and do whatever they want in their dreams, all while being aware of it. They might be more prone to play video games because their souls are more actively seeking this mental challenge and sense of hope that they couldn't get otherwise.

While the rest of us do not ever manually create our dreams or become aware of being in them... is this an inclination to just how robotic some of us might be compared to others?

Just last night I had a dream that I thought was real. It was one that revealed to me how I might behave under certain circumstances if they did occur. In the dream, my reactions actually ended up making things worse, so it made me realize that I should not act that way should those circumstances ever occur. And the topic was about something personal I had actually discussed with a friend last night. So it is as if I am being communicated to, and not doing the communicating.

/u/reptiliandude hope you might be able to chime in here?

Edit: I previously spoken to RD about another dream I had - i had told him that my natural response would be to assume it's purely psychological, but I instead was leaning more toward the fact that something/someone was communicating to me. This was his response to what I said:

"Good. You're awakening from the stupor that has been encouraged in your species to make you easier to manipulate and control.
The confusing images you're seeing are how the brain deals with coming out of its self-induced complacency."

I know I keep bringing this up, but could it be that they are drop-teching from the moon, much like how a satellite would work? Also I imagine it would serve the purpose of preserving their original lifespans while being in a distant orbit and different gravitational field.

Man... If I were a newcomer to this subreddit I would certainly be like WTF is he talking about... which is really what I am trying hard not to do. But in all seriousness, I can see this as one of the real purposes behind it.

Try to imagine this:

It can be predicted that at this rate of advancement in our technology, we very well may arrive at the stage in our lives where we are capable of creating a virtual reality where the frame rate is identical to real life. We then, become the creators of that new dimensional plane.

If then, that life within the virtual reality becomes more pleasing to us than the one in real life.... and the technology evolves to the point to make this possible: would it not make sense for some of us to transfer our consciousness to that virtual life?

If our lives become so boring, whether from a lack of challenge or difficulty, or poor quality of life, or simply just no room left to continually evolve any further - why wouldn't it make sense for us to start anew in a life that we may fulfill with imperfectness in hope and challenge. In video games, we choose between easy, medium, and hard modes exactly for this reason. And many of us create characters in the likeness of our own image... as if this were just a stem from the fractal trees that we are.

This is what perplexes me also. If this consciousness transference from body to body exists much like he explains, does it then become likely that we might also be someone/something else sleeping in a pod awoken into another body? Perhaps all of us in this universe could even just as well originate as very advanced beings with the technology to do it from such a distance, only that we do not retain past memories.

Very interesting stuff.

I think I ought to give this game a try.

I was just watching this video on it, pretty mind boggling:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bmJkaEicALU

I'm very curious to know the science behind what our dreams are.

Is it communication from God? If it is, what's the science behind that?
Is it telepathic communication from another being, or someone/something from another dimension or universe?
Is it our own bodies/genetic makeup trying to communicate something to us through images?
Is it a transfer of consciousness from the physical body to some body existing on some separate plane of existence?
Is it just our pure subconscious psychological responses to certain stimuli we experience?

RD did say that genes can be made to communicate over long distances... I also was told by some that I sometimes laugh and talk in my sleep. I am curious as to what that is too.

"The player takes the role of a robot with a seemingly human consciousness[10] as they explore a number of environments that include over 120 puzzles."

The unnamed protagonist—a robotic android—gains consciousness in a serene environment. A disembodied voice, identifying itself as Elohim, informs the robot that it has created several worlds that it should explore and collect the sigils hidden within various puzzles as part of a path to enlightenment. Soon, the android finds itself at a base of a gigantic tower that disappears in a dark cloud high above, and Elohim warns him not to climb the tower.

As the android explores the world, it finds numerous messages from other seemingly-sentient beings that have traveled this world before, questioning the world they are in and the messages from Elohim. It also witnesses elements of the world flicker and glitch at times, suggesting that this is a virtual space as suggested by the previous messages. The android discovers a limited number of Messengers, disciples of Elohim—androids like itself—that serve Elohim without question. Computer terminals across the worlds allow the android to learn about the fate of mankind through logs, emails, and other texts; at some time in the past, an unstoppable lethal virus that had previously been frozen in Earth's permafrost was released as a result of global warming, its effect causing those infected to slowly lose their sanity before dying. A last-ditch effort was made to collect all of humanity's knowledge in computer databanks for posterity before the effects of the virus took those researchers, in the hope that someday alien visitors would visit earth and be able to make use of it.

Huh... interesting. Thank you for that. Makes me wonder...

I don't know whether this is worth mentioning here or not, because I don't want to create unnecessary disbelief. And we still don't know exactly what our dreams are. But I certainly would like to think of it as a sign of God. Over the past few months, I've had quite a few dreams relating to extraterrestrials. And, the most vivid one I had was actually the night before I came across RD's posts. It was about a series of exams I had to take, and there had been large crowds of people taking it as well. Each exam was color coded, and the final last exam was purple, the last spectrum on a rainbow. Somehow, I was the only one who passed all the exams... and my reward was some type of white cat that appeared before my eyes. It shook me up when I woke up right at that moment. I've always had a strong connection with cats also, by the way. When I came across RD's posts that day, I felt there must have been some relation.

When I was younger (around 8-10), I always had poor grades because I spent a lot of time in class to draw random shit like aliens and dragons while the teacher was talking, and I haven't a single clue why I enjoyed it so much. My brother did too actually. And I'm still curious to know. It was only last week while I was kayaking out on the ocean I saw a cloud that looked exactly in the shape of a dragon's head, shaped EXACTLY in the way that I used to draw them as a kid. I wouldn't have noticed if my GF didn't point it out. It even had a separate cloud protruding from it's mouth to make it look like it was breathing fire over the land. I took a photograph, and even traced it out myself. It's as if only I could decipher it myself, no one else would understand. Whether this is coincidental pareidolia or not, to this day I simply can not stop myself staring at this photo regularly.

You're welcome :). One could say I'm just fishin' in the sea of truth 🎣

I think you brought up a lot of really good points here, garbo. And it's really unfortunate that truth draws so much pessimism.

Regardless, I would just like to point out that a lot of these problems like narcissism, desensitivity to violence, indifference to suffering, and atheism are a result of lack of awareness and close-mindedness. The struggles of compliance, sexual promiscuity, and indifference to suffering may be more a result of our ever-increasing dopamine release requirements due to our own entrapments to immediate short term pleasures.

So, I would say that the lack of awareness/close-mindedness can be accomplished by those in control by:

Keeping us divided by evoking negativity or fear with things that are unfamiliar to our own interests - this negativity is what the media runs on. It inadvertently spews out things against people of races, genders, religious backgrounds, cultures, personalities, physical appearances, political backgrounds, and people that simply do not comply with a normal sense of tradition. Things become so easily demonized by the few of those in control, and as a result masses then follow even when they have not even an inkling of knowledge in any background or evidence. Examples: communism, extraterrestrials, both vaccines and anti-vax, bitcoin, homosexuality, and certain people like Muammar Gaddafi. There is a parable by Matthew on the recounts of Jesus in the garden, who actually, without explanation, subjugates to the whims of two evil men to drive out the demons within them into a horde of swine. The demonized pigs then run off to suicide themselves off a cliff. Jesus' way of exposing the laws of nature?

They want us to be too specialized at our jobs. We become too comfortable and confident, and thus too close-minded and condescending when we become too knowledgable in a certain field. Scientists, religious minded individuals, engineers, journalists, artists, etc. like to think they know everything there is to know, when actually they may only be grasping just the details of a very narrow area. Many people simply just want to take stage, embellish, and defend their own beliefs to feel good about it, despite being completely wrong. Many celebrities are the epitome of such dystopian thinking, yet they are promoted as the role models. Unfortunately, it seems having a broader less specialized knowledge isn't as well rewarded in our society.

Food. It's obvious we're being poisoned with chemicals and fattened with addictive and cheaply produced products by greedy corporations. And those trying to lose weight are bought into even crappier diet pills and products, so much that they lose their sense of focus in life. I don't have evidence, but from observation, I would believe that an over-consumption of certain chemicals may have some effect on how we use our brains altogether.

Frequencies also. Whether it's from the TV, computer, radio, or some strange hidden frequencies played in loop in your neighborhood, they play a significant part in how we open our mind to the constant flow of information. I strongly believe that certain frequencies in mainstream music keeps us contained and close-minded if we repetitively listen to them. Listening to music that can utilize the Fibonacci sequence is what might motivate us to understand beyond what we already know. From this, we may develop a sense of artistry and yearn for a grander understanding of the universe.

By controlling our education. I have attended schools in both the East and West, and I see a discrepancy. I've lived in China for quite a few years, and have observed its media and its people, so I suppose I may have a general idea on brainwashing and how it is conducted. At least in China, children need to memorize very long passages all the time, pretty much on a weekly basis I'd say. It is to my knowledge that memorization is considered one of the few techniques in brainwashing activities. Because students are not required to actually learn the material, they instead they just repeat it without knowing the content that they memorized. They also taught to repeat what the teacher says during classes, and are tested narrowly on remembering for the exam rather than for the wide scope of content. On top of that, the classes are so full of people that they are less inclined to ask questions. And there are no critical thinking classes, not even in universities. And with such time-consuming repetitive behaviors, they go into the real world thinking they got a full education but actually they only did what they could to pass and obtain a job in a highly competitive field. I suppose the same repetitive memorization skills are taught at churches, mosques, and whatever religious institute there is where scripture is often required to be memorized without understanding what it truly means.

How they drive society to not care about important issues:

I hate this one because I sound like a hypocrite, but it must be stated. It is the creation of online platforms that allow people to complain and voice opinions that simply do not matter in the end. It's like a company at your office hiring a PR guy to handle the increasing number of complaints, just for the sake of giving employees/customers an outlet. Even my comment here is meaningless if I or no one reading this does anything to act upon it. Can't say too many people will expend energy beyond what is already required for people to complain. We're also getting so much lazier, which is my next point:

They want us to be lazy and very comfortable. We are so lazy these days because the dopamine released from such minor activities as watching TV, playing video games, and especially from watching porn is increased tenfold from how it might have been decades ago. Marketing and and corporate psychologists are discovering optimal ways to leech out our addictive behaviors. Our reward systems have been altered so much that we crave it, and it's so much that we simply don't care about things that go beyond our immediate scope of reality anymore.

By controlling what is 'cool' and what isn't. A lot of people are deterred from wanting to understand the universe and sharing such information because selfish behaviors have become prioritized both outwardly and subliminally in our media. People naturally fall into a place where these easily tempted behaviors get in the way of everything else. Showing off has become the ultimate concern, and sadly it is especially for this new wave of uneducated peasants who now drive companies and earn large sums from the economic booms in China.

Yes, it’s something that is very tricky to think about. The answer is hard to say, as one could easily fall into the category of advocating a society that may be too robotic or instead one that is too ignorant of the truths.

For instance, if it became known that race X of nation Y committed 90% of all crimes in that nation, does it become fair to monitor these type of people more tightly? Or would it make things any better should there be assigned representatives to these groups of people to improve on such a weakness?

It’s hard to say what is fair, but it still seems it’s a matter of generalization. Not every person of a specific race will align with the patterns of the race they belong to, but you can make the statement that MAJORITY of them will. By concealing such information, all we will do instead is try to look away from the weaknesses of a particular race, rather than try to solve them.

Revealing such taxonomic information will only divide us up more if society promotes negativity with unfamiliarity (which it currently does). If society didn’t promote such negativity with unfamiliarity, I think it would be far more beneficial to reveal every statistical truth about all the races on this world. In my opinion, this is where the true problem lies.

And you’re right statistics can’t always be trusted, but what is the truth then, without ever having them for reference at all? Taxonomic stats could be seen as a form of truth based on the past to help those change for the future. Think of how an NBA player might rely on his own stats to find ways to improve his game.

I believe that there are general patterns that exist, and that nature does follow them, as it can be seen in the cycles of markets and economies. This is one of the reasons I believe in karma. There seems to be a balance in the universe, keeping all things in harmony. Just because not every individual follows the general patterns they were born into, doesn’t mean these general patterns do not exist either.

I’m actually half American and half Chinese, so these things you bring up ring pretty deep with me. From what I understand, it’s both genetics and experience, not one or the other. When you bring up language, yes, it’s a part of our experience and I believe it does play an effect in our mode of thought - this is something I had learned once before, called linguistic determinism.

While your version is correct, I think it goes beyond just numbers. I’ll try to explain it in a concise way:
An average Chinese (or even Korean/Japanese for that matter) must memorize over 10,000 characters throughout their lifetime, to learn how to speak and recognize these characters on a daily basis. They need to remember the strokes of each character, and on top of that, the correct tones for each one.
The English alphabet has only 26 letters, so all that needs to be remembered are connecting the sounds of the letters to the syllables. In fact, many Western languages have been limited in this sense.
With such a huge discrepancy, many Asians are constantly accessing the memorization side of their brain, while those in the West are not required to do so. So, you can say that Asians who utilize this type of language develop brains to be better at math for this reason, because they have a much faster access to the application side of these methods, from the constant repetition in that particular area of their brain. This does not mean Asians are in general superior to other races, but perhaps could be in this particular area. I certainly don’t think racial hierarchies would form based on publishing these strengths in these very narrow areas.

I suck at math by the way, but for other known factors besides my genetics. Regardless what factors they are, without completely understanding the root cause of my poor math abilities, whether hindered based on a part of my genetics, or some other environmental aspect, I might find myself squandering time on something that could have had been spent on something that aligns more with my strengths. Or, if I wanted to, I could easily identify it as a weakness and concentrate on improving this area as much as I can.

So I guess my point is, I’m leaning more towards the choice of a society built around freely expressing racial differences: the Kayeen actually might be dividing us up even MORE by concealing the truth about our individual races. Our world suffers from senseless racism when it could easily be avoided with the truth. Like feminism, racism distracts us from the real issues, rather than working on them for the better. And it makes sense since the Kayeen do, after all, want us to be divided from the real issues.

It might just be that the pyramids also act as counterweights for the moon, to keep the balance of moon and stop it from rotating. After all, it makes no sense as to why it doesn't, as other planets' moons do rotate. There is a lot of disinformation to sort through regarding this.

In this video, at about the 22 min mark, it explains it here, theorizing that there are 4 on the moon to counterbalance it:
https://vimeo.com/63097277
(warning: this video gets pretty scary if you watch all of it, almost as if intentional)

With this lack of rotation, it can stop fluctuations in weather/gravity and the electromagnetic field. Not exactly sure what this will do, but I get the feeling it may have some pretty dramatic effects on time for those staying there.

Some more convincing information here:
http://www.disclose.tv/news/Ancient_Alien_Moon_Fortress_And_Pyramids_Revealed/85528

All you had to do was type a few words into google, you know...

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsGlqRX5l_q44bADLmWRndkHW3ivDzUjv

Man... really good.
I really got the feels from this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QL8lQU_1a-w

If you have anything you think you can add to this list, please do!

Hi all,

I would like a make a comment for those who may come across these posts for the first time, in case the information they read is initially too overwhelming, causes disbelief, or just not really hitting the mark for them:

I request that you first learn to have an OPEN-MIND. It does not mean gullibly believe everything you see/read, but use your sense of CRITICAL REASONING to arrive at the conclusions. If you have not been able to hone those two skills of open-mindedness and critical reasoning, I suggest that you will need to first follow these 10 steps:

1. Be patient and read everything you can before concluding your judgment. Embrace all information that is provided to you, regardless of how backward it can be. You can’t fully judge something until you take the time to get to understand it first.
2. Accept that it’s in human nature to reject an uncertainty if it strays far from or has a chance of causing a negative impact on our daily lives.
3. Understand that reality can be stranger than fiction - this is because strangeness is simply caused by our unfamiliarity to something.
4. Understand that strange/outlandish does not always equate to mentally delusional, crazy, or on drugs - these are negative connotations put forth by our media and culture to defend ourselves from unfamiliarity. Also, calling something a conspiracy theory is just a label with a negative connotation, even if the evidence exists to prove it.
5. Evidence can often be ignored or rejected when a bias of our own understanding gets in the way.
6. Know that you do not need to be a researcher or a scientist to discover new things. All you need to be is an open-minded critical thinker.
7. I you believe the universe is massive, then why wouldn't it be the case that the chance of extra-terrestrial lifeforms existing is huge? With that said, the existence of intelligent life forms with the ability to visit other planets may also be likely in such a scenario.
8. Herd mentality is a real thing, and is necessary to push societies forward. Societies seemingly work better when majority of its people are kept under control, whether they know it or not. So it's best to understand that there are things that need to be deliberately hidden from us. A wide-scale knowledge of the truth can cause panic and instability.
9. The implementation of the internet is underestimated - The internet is a powerful invention that has given us access to so much information, including leaked information not meant to be seen by our eyes. Back then information had to come from individual sources, but now it can come from nearly anywhere. While it does hold a lot of fake information (and a lot of it deliberately fake), that's where our open-mindedness and critical reasoning need to come into play.
10. Being the perceptibly dominant species of our planet and having an Internet and technology also does not mean we have a complete understanding of history, religion, science, math, and all other subjects. The present doesn’t signify the height of all understanding.

Thanks a lot :), the Philip Glass works are really phenomenal, right up my alley.

You're very welcome. I must also thank you then for the knowledge I discover and share as a result of your clues. I grew up always loving to solve puzzles, it was one area I could really hyperfocus on - I guess this is the same thing but on a much grander scale eh??

Gonna take a dive in on RD's quotation ' ' clues here, if you guys don't mind.

For this one in particular, you must be talking about the Golden Ratio (1.618 or .618). While it’s often represented to look like a ‘fan’ in geometry, and was a tool for calculating and tracking of calendar dates, it also can be incorporated in music. It’s a number that can represent fractal patterns, and it’s something often relied upon in creating masterpieces in art. I have quite a bit of experience in film and photography, so I just so happen to grasp this point.

In music, this ratio (AKA phi), is called the Fibonacci sequence, and it’s used not just in the timing compositional structure (climax at the .618 point), but also in the scales and the frequencies. For those who can achieve a certain level of sophistication in music or art, hearing these scales in the right frequencies may create a feeling of bliss. It’s likely a main factor as to what makes some musical pieces renowned masterpieces without us ever realizing it. So, yes, there is science existing in all art forms.
Source here: https://www.goldennumber.net/music/

Here’s a very basic example how it might sound:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_Ob-X6DMI4

Our famous composers like Beethoven and Mozart knew how to incorporate such a thing into their music. Like Lindsey Stirling, I’m quite sure there are many songs that use it nowadays too. I believe that it’s often used in scores for TV commercials, or perhaps even movies, and also has been used in highly nostalgic video games like Ocarina of Time, Final Fantasy 7, The Sims (original), etc. Hell, evidence shows many corporations use the golden ratio to even design their logos. I imagine if someone could pick apart the songs individually and examine them closely they will see them.

We don’t have too many of these greats like Beethoven and Mozart today because even though some great sounding music is still being produced and incorporating the use of the Fibonacci sequence, nowadays music has become such a saturated industry that it’s become difficult to pick out certain songs and label them a masterpiece like we did with Beethoven and Mozart.

Many people claim that certain frequencies open up more chakras in the body. Whether the existence of chakras are complete BS or not, there might be something more scientific explaining how the wave vibrates through our eardrum to our brain, creating this feeling of bliss.

From my observations I would say that music that utilizes this ratio is what will open up minds, at least to the ones that listen. The frequencies we currently listen to on the radio have an effect on humanity that more than likely has the exact opposite effect, keeping us contained. I listen mostly to a lot of Progressive Trance & House, and Deep House (mostly songs with no lyrics) and always did so because they helped me to concentrate. I believe I can say that I attribute listening to this type of music toward motivating me to further understand the universe.

Besides music, this ratio is used in math, science, finance, visual art, architecture, design, the solar system, the universe, you name it. So I now see this number as a key of some sort, connecting many different industries together.

Not sure how I feel about a society built around not freely expressing truthful racial differences... I want to agree with you, but my brain says maybe not...?

On the one hand, we know the differences are surely there, we just try to look away from them. And a lot of people do already inherently judge both by who we are and where we're from. By publishing attributes of certain races we would be more aware of both ourselves and others, and so we'd have a clearer mutual understanding. Think about how when RD objectively points out that humans are a hyper-sexualized, stubborn species. It puts things in perspective, makes you understand how it is, and motivates to find a better way to work on those weaknesses for all of us, right?

But on the other hand, if society doesn't promote overcoming these differences, you are right that hierarchies could form and segregate even more. I mean, let's be honest that this hierarchy pretty much already exists though, and so whether or not you want to make the taxonomic reasons more known to the public or not is up for debate.

So instead of racism, you get scientific racism, which is racism not based on feeling/experience, but instead one based on breeding.

You could find racial statistics if you really searched hard for them. But I haven't really judged anyone based on them. Maybe it's something that varies from person to person. Ultimately depends on how each person deals with unfamiliarity, I suppose?

I guess that's the underlying point when it comes time for humans to judge reptilians when we learn of them.

Well, I'm not Dan Winters, but I do think he has something. I admit that his page looks like shit, and a lot of his stuff regarding aliens doesn't align with RD - but I don't think this slandering of his work is really going to help here. He is one of the only people studying fractals from a different angle, which is the reason I brought him up - the man clearly is putting a lot of effort into what he is working on. It's the same as if someone told you that your communicating with this "reptilian" was only holding you back in your life. You don't want to become those same people.

You're only illustrating that we as people jump the gun on that something is BS without tightening the bolts. I believe there is some truth behind it as long as we can keep questioning it until we get it. And I can't really find a better source than his - but if you do, let me know.

Priority is in answering the WOW signal, yeah... but what do you think is going to get people to do that? By discovering the truths, regardless of what they are, and sharing it!

I would also like to theorize that... maybe this is also how the Caucasoid race began after the cataclysm? Prior to that, you had said it was dominated by Negroid-Mongoloids.

Not to sound racist or anything, but I feel pressured to assume that the Caucasoid race or "white people" could be the offshoot of these people who travelled to and from the Moon? I mean, I can't imagine them getting too much UV light up there all this time. This "Homo Toxicus" might just be the quintessence of "original sin" and sociopathy, since they are the closest related to the Kayeen. We were a violent people back then. And so it would make sense that we are closer to them in relation based on the proximity of the ancestry chain. And so a self-governed morality was highly essential for us. And since we happen to be the most dominant race, many cultures formed from it and somewhat succumb to the cultures even (Hong Kong & Japan, for example). That, in a sense would be imperialism at the core.

So back to the pyramids then... the pyramids then are some sort of device with crystalline structures perhaps used to point at the stars and transmit energy onto the Moon?

And then I guess that means that the obelisks would be the calibration device for those traveling back to this world:

http://abrieflookattomorrow.bizland.com/images/eve_of_%20destruction/obelisk2.jpg

Party up in Rome!

Or perhaps, the ancient civilizations began colonizing on the Moon during its cell division phase during the floods, which might explain some sightings of old structures there. The spin of the Earth would probably have eventually propelled it into an orbit at a slow rate. Because of the mass of the Moon, the characteristics of gravity and light are different and thus the time structures are different. I'd imagine the low level of gravity would make them rather tall by now. They perhaps colonized on "The Dark Side of the Moon". Since they were a curiously smart people, they developed some rockin' fast ships to travel to Earth, and thus that now explains why we have all these lyrical songs with "two meanings". They arrived in a new time. So that's the Stairway to Heaven, eh?

Am I... am I on some sort of list yet?

Edit: I am staring at a full moon right now as I type this, and wow does it amaze the crap out of me.

Sigh... now I really am going to have to pick up that game, my GF is gonna hate me for this.

Humor aside, I will take an educated shot here from my reading:
When the cataclysm that happened 13,000 years ago struck Antarctica, the resulting strike knocked out some of the Earth's core from the opposite end, which then in a kind of "cell division-like manner" eventually fell out of orbit to now be our Moon. That is very contrary to our current beliefs about the Moon. I suppose what you are saying is that the moon did not exist before then, and that the ancient civilizations who existed then during that time underwent some significant changes in gravity during that event, as the sudden tilt on its axis might also have given it some dramatic changes. That is quite a head scratcher, one hell of a jigsaw puzzle right there.

These underwater obelisks with an abyss in the middle would signify where the Moon escaped from the Earth... there must be something very mysterious down there... Tower of Babel?

http://scariestbookofalltime.blogspot.com/2010/01/no-moon-prior-to-11713-years-ago.html

http://www.ancient-code.com/mysterious-underwater-obelisks-at-the-opposite-side-of-the-great-pyramid-of-giza/

Well, here's my first step toward the evidence then:
http://www.messagetoeagle.com/underwaterobelisk.php#.WRFL7VOGOqA

Scoffers gonna scoff, so be it.

Like a needle in a haystack... or should I say more like a needle in an expanding/contracting balloon. It appears then that the pyramid and this 5-prong obelisk ring (Diablo 2, huh?) are axis points for the Earth, allowing for expanding and contracting along these poles, perhaps at very small increments for de-syncing time for people standing at these locations. The obelisks around the world would perhaps measure this expansion and contraction for those who would like to know what point in time they stand. And I suppose these obelisks go very very deep underground.

So... to reinforce my theory yet again... there are certain people who exist in time out of sync with the rest of the world.

Regarding side effects, I suppose the increased/decreased amount of gravity would result in some physical changes like height or increased exertion of energy?

Huh. Interesting.

Gravitational time dilation is a form of time dilation, an actual difference of elapsed time between two events as measured by observers situated at varying distances from a gravitating mass. The weaker the gravitational potential (the farther the clock is from the source of gravitation), the faster time passes.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation

I seem to have read somewhere that the Roswell incident was a time capsule of some sort that crash landed...

So it may or may not just be that these monumental obelisks are somehow stabilizing a time capsule in place at an equidistant point way above Earth's atmosphere.

Allow me to theorize something here, first starting with the pyramids:

RD said that the pyramids were built by the Egyptian people, but didn't exactly say whether or not it was FOR the people.

And as he said, there is a lot of spoon-fed nonsense out there feeding us lies about what these truly are, without any scientific explanations at all. But, that doesn’t mean that there aren’t any existing scientific attempts to explain it: we can come to understand that these are constructs of fractals, using phase conjugates of the golden ratio, charge compression in bioactive fields, and energy efficiency optimization through the creation of certain shapes.

The only information on the net that even comes close to scientifically explaining any of this was mentioned before by somebody on here: the work of Dan Winters. Winters even states himself that scientists are too specialized (physicists, astrologers, astronomers, archaeologists, etc.) and thus too separated from one another to understand the entire picture of things. RD hinted this in a few other posts as well.

While I'm not a scientist at all, it doesn't keep me from trying to understand these things with perhaps an even more open mind. And so I don’t think we would find this information unless we go looking towards non-mainstream research, as majority would keep away from it. These things are simply intentionally obscured out of our view.

So allow me to provide these two links to Dan Winter’s studies, and props to him for his research here:
http://www.fractalfield.com/

And then this was Dan Winter’s paraphrasing, taken also from the book “The Original Great Pyramid and Future Science” by Noel Huntley:

“The bible was merely a frail distortion of the Sumerian/Egyptian, which came from the Annunaki bloodlines.
The original pyramid was designed as a Harmonic Resonance Chamber, through which multidimensional frequency bands could be pulled in from deep space and from the planetary core of Sirius B, using a great ankh positioned directly below a crystalline cap stone. Through the power of the ankh a tremendous amount of UHF energy was pulled into focus within the cap stone of the pyramid, then pro- jected downward through the structure into the second-dimensional frequency bands. The pyramid and Arc of the Covenant were situated upon Earth's geographical center point, within the energy vortex that represented the "Heart Chakra" within Earth's planetary bio-energetic system. This vortex allowed energy exchange to take place between Earth and the fourth-dimensional frequency bands. By creating a Harmonic Resonance Chamber within such an interdimensional vortex, the D-2 over- tones of HU-1 could be combined with the base tones of D-4/HU-2, forming an interdimensional resonant tone through which visiting craft traveling from Sirius B and other star systems could enter and leap through time, making transit to Earth almost instantaneous. The Great Pyramid was created to allow immediate inter- vention of the Sirian Council and Galactic Federation fleets should the Arc of the Covenant come under Anunnaki Resistance attack. While the pyramid was in operation as an interstellar teleport station, it served as the greatest deterrent to the Annunaki Resisance invasion. The Great Pyramid was used as an active interstellar transport station from the time of its construction 48,459 years ago to about 30,000 years ago (about 28,000 BC) when an explosion in Atlantis caused Earth to tile slightly on its axis, knocking the pyramid's 4-D vortex (Earth's heart chakra) out of its previous alignment with the vortex systems of Sirius B and several other planetary systems to which it had been originally aligned. ET visitation was commonplace in Egypt prior to this misalignment of the Earth's grid, but following this event, transit from other star systems required more time and resources, so visitation became much less frequent.”

If the Great Pyramid truly was a device to transport matter instantaneously, leaping through time, why would it not be possible if humans had the chance of getting their hands on that same technology? And if they did… that means, what could they do with such abilities? I've heard stories of such people...

But let’s go back to these “masons” who helped build the pyramid… what happened to them? Were they ever rewarded for their efforts? Did they just so happen to ever become… “free”? Keep in mind, these were also a people strongly educated in the values of MORALITY.

Now, a recent conversation between myself & RD went like this:

Me: When you talk about those ancient Egyptian people who created a system that allowed people to blindly yet still vigorously support a system that went against their own self-interests...
…Would there happen to be any chance of those same exact people existing to this same day? Running the world in a similar fashion through skipping ahead in time?
RD: Define 'exact same people,' and 'skipping ahead in time.'
Me: Okay, poor choice of words. "Same exact people" as in humans who were powerful enough to have had access to an advanced species' technology. "Skip ahead in time" as in leave and return the world rapidly. Forgive me if I still do not fully comprehend this. If such fast travel were to occur, do you not still exist in the same 3D realm?
RD: "...do you not still exist in the same 3D realm?"
Well, mostly...
But you're the species that hasn't learned how to calibrate its watches and get everyone else on the same schedule.
So it's no wonder you keep on missing the trains when they blow by you.
Good Heavens... ( literally). You can't even see them.

Now let’s examine some of the beliefs of the “freemasons”:

Question: "What is Free Masonry and what do Free Masons believe?"

Answer: Freemasonry, Eastern Star, and other similar "secret" organizations appear to be harmless fellowship gatherings. Many of them appear to promote belief in God. However, upon closer examination, we find that the only belief requirement is not that one must believe in the True and Living God, but rather, that one must believe in the existence of a “Supreme Being”, which includes the “gods” of Islam, Hinduism, or any other world religion.

The Bible is only one of several “Volume(s) of Sacred Law,” all of which are deemed to be equally important in Freemasonry. The Bible is an important book, only as far as those members who claim to be Christians are concerned, just as the Koran is important to Muslims. The Bible is not considered to be the exclusive Word of God, nor is it considered to be God’s sole revelation of himself to humankind; but only one of many religious sourcebooks. It is a good guide for morality. The Bible is used primarily as a symbol of God’s will, which can also be captured in other sacred texts, like the Koran or Rig Vedas.

All members must believe in a deity. Different religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam, etc.) acknowledge the same God, only call Him different names. Freemasonry invites people of all faiths, even if they use different names for the ‘Nameless One of a hundred names,’ they are yet praying to the one God and Father of all.

If you’ve read all of RD’s posts, it is pretty much to the point of what he acknowledges as well. And it appears that the media brings these people down as much as they can.

On top of that, one of the reasons the quarantine exists is to eliminate interference of our evolution, so that we may eventually come to create our own knowledge based currencies from our own histories in the future. So, it is still the Assembly's intention for us to rely on our own humankind to shape our future.

Concluding from that, it is in my belief that the pyramids or this “Old Record Needle” Rd mentions (Cleopatra’s Needle) has something to do with:
A. recording/writing memory or
B. calibrating time
For those who travel back to this world.
It is my theory that the workers who built the pyramids are the same people as the freemasons, if not their own descendants - and they are the same people running the world today. This was their ultimate reward for years of extreme manual labor.

Edit: I'll also add here that the freemason symbols can be found on the 'needle' obelisks.

I think this would be the more appropriate response here:

http://m.imgur.com/gallery/Y5ycwfM

Aside from the dozens and dozens denominations of Christianity, and many branches of other religions, allow me to please step forward so I can take a swing at Scientology, right in the face.

It seems at this point, the very existence of this religion has done nothing more than steal from a select few, and harness skepticism among a much larger audience. It's almost as if it was originally intended to blow up the media, bringing people to a height of awareness of the psychological lure of religion, amassing skepticism against religion in general. And at the same time, because Scientology has its own way of distorting science (it even has 'science' in the name!), it also provides the more ignorant with fuel to lash out against whatever new or perhaps 'strange' truthful sciences that may come about.

Looking at RD's previous comments, we can gather the following theory:

Different solar systems and different galaxies have different measures of forces affecting mass and different acceleration factors, so they have different time structures, which in turn is something necessary to calculate all their 'future' calculations. I suppose this is the necessary piece to the puzzle that we may want to examine?

As for how light travels through the void: the singularity was broken up into pieces bound into regions of fields of fractals, which generate frequencies that hyper-accelerate the flow of certain energies. Energy is stimulated by the natural energy flows of certain shapes.

This seems to be the right track. More thoughts on this?