I understand the context completely, it's just that the premise is bullshit. The story of the tree of knowledge is an allegory for the rise of agriculture being based on the production of beer? The problem is agriculture developed simultaneously across the globe in several areas for varying reasons. In the area you are speaking of wheat only comprised 2 of the 8 "founder" crops that spurred agriculture. In China there was rice, cultivated for a variety of reasons. In the Americas agriculture was developed to grow psychedelic plants used in religious practices. Which would make a much more cogent argument for the fruit of the tree of knowledge than beer. However I don't see you ascribing to the idea of a Latino Adam and Eve. Adam and Eva I suppose. Try harder lizard boy.

I know I'm late to this, just ran into it on another sub. You're rant about olive oil is baseless, the Tree of Knowledge was the pomegranate.