Many fronts... many variations on a story.

Heh.

Many factions use fear to motivate randoms to do what they want.

I see no difference between an internal and external chip, as far as hackability is concerned. If it's based on technology, it can be supplanted by superior technology.

There are already plenty of people with chips inside them. They are no more secure than people carrying external electronics.

Hacking banks and other groups is designed to incentivize us to get chipped for security.

But chips can be hacked.

Iranian terrorists? Iran isn't exactly the first nation that springs to mind when I think "terrorism." Personally, I'd view it as sixth or seventh in the world terrorism rankings. North Korea doesn't even appear.

How does crypto-currency protect us from being chipped any better than violent resistance against anyone trying to forcibly inject chips into us? How exactly do hacking threats increase the amount of faith in crypto-currency? If anything, they make me want to move away from digital currency and stick to physical. Certain cryptos have already been devastated by hacks, not exactly demonstrating their reliability there.

I like this sub because of the compelling thought experiments it provides, but this post sounds like a Bitcoin pump-and-dump wrapped in conspiracy theory for flavor.

MRI machines seem like a pretty effective, if potentially painful, method of discovering whether you've been chipped - at least as far as ferrous implants go. I'm in a line of work that might leave my eyeballs pelted with metallic micro-shrapnel, which means I have to get pre-emptively scanned for such debris before I get an MRI, which could literally yank that metal out of my body.

Is this sub slowing down a little? I pop in to check every once in a while, and it seems like it's not as active as when I first discovered it. My previous Reddit usernames refer to proxy infliction of rage, which... gives me an idea for my next one.