Hi.

You never got one or more old reply from me due to auto-moderation related to url shortners maybe.

Divide and conquer might indeed be a name of a game.

How about give yourself some credit when it comes to researching whales for yourself. How much can we learn in a university classroom that we can't learn online?

Scientists are becoming anti-Genesis because that's how they are being driven toward, as our religions have become muddied to the point of true understanding.

Does it not seem like there are powers in place who are trying to steer us toward being anti-Genesis intentionally if NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM is found on US dollar bills next to occultic symbolism associated with freemasonry and Egypt? Consider here if Notre Dame is about as mainstream as if get when it comes to Latin and even Notre Dame has a Latin translator that admits seclorum is concerned with world, universe, secular, temporal, worldly affairs, cares, and temptation?

If Genesis is true, then is it not apparent that mainstream history is way off base and Adam was created about 6,000 years ago and there was a global flood less than 4,500 years ago? How about we not limit all knowledge to things that are written, but is there anything written in Genesis that is untrustworthy if we weigh academia against actual unbiased evidence?

What corrupt societies have ties to worshipping the devil?

How about we start with freemasonry and move on from there if that is an example that includes thousands of influencial people including presidents, kings, prime ministers, supreme court justices, governors, commanders, generals, actors, singers, astronauts, writers, inventors and founders? Is it not also known as the Craft and associated with goat images and with upside down stars in pentagons and with obelisks and even with the devil himself if you consider words of Albert Pike?

https://rapsta24.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/0093_12.png

https://i.pinimg.com/736x/9e/76/54/9e76542d8e2ffebd7c303f59016c5b02.jpg

https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch&q=the+Craft+freemasonry&cad=h

https://www.google.com/search?q=freemasonry+goats&rlz=1C1NHXL_enUS736US736&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwii8fGNk7DVAhWDaT4KHeU5CDYQ_AUICigB&biw=1180&bih=583

https://www.google.com/search?q=order+of+the+eastern+star&rlz=1C1NHXL_enUS736US736&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjq-b_fk7DVAhVEPT4KHRNfBhkQ_AUIBigB&biw=1180&bih=596

How much do you yourself think the media controls shaping your thoughts and understanding of things, and how much of it are you aware of it?

I might not watch much mainstream news and have very little if any faith in mainstream science and yet have decades of indoctrination under a belt that has likely led some pull in one way or another.

Have you compared what RD claims with stuff claimed by new age channellers and asked yourself what differs?

Where do you stand when it comes to stuff like new age religion and new age channellers and the house of theosophy and Alice Bailey? Is there any doubt in you that there are big time connections between new age religion and the occult and between the occult and organizations like freemasonry?

"8:19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their Elohim? for the living to the dead?

8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
-Isaiah 8:19-20 (RNKJV)

We might ultimately have to make a decision between trusting in RD and trusting in Yahushua/Jesus. And what do we have to lose by trusting in Christ?

So to be quite honest with you, I have no knowledge at all of that new age stuff. What examples are you specifically referring to?

I might be rusty on what is taught myself and generally try to refrain from reading channeled messages from new agers, but what is not basically exactly what RD preaches himself if there are new age channeled beings who paint a picture like they are ascended masters and like there is a corrupt world cabal that will soon be exposed by beings of light who have UFOs?

In regards to your second question, would damage control or introduction to a new age of information make sense to you also?

What would not make perfect sense if there are fallen angels who are trying to lead us into a Novus Ordo Seclorum and into accepting fallen angels as ascended beings of light?

And what’s spoken more like they are myths more than our ancient Greek mythologies?

There might be fallen angels who want people kept in darkness in regards to Genesis 6:4 and how it relates to ancient religion in general, but consider Josephus and a 1st section of a 3rd chapter here?

Ever wonder that maybe not all the Bible is pure fiction or reality, and that there might be some gray area rather than black and white?

There might be various books in Bibles with various amount of credibility, but is there really much of a gray area when it comes to stuff like Genesis and Exodus if we are even given long genealogies that involve specific names and years and if main figures are sometimes discussed in a very unflattering light? We might either be dealing with a strict attempt of a recording of truth or a collection of bold faced lies when it comes to those.

Wouldn’t you agree with me that… by how much thoughtful exchange we’ve done thus far, that this world really seems to be one gigantic clusterfuck of a puzzle?

Ha. Something like that maybe, but what should we expect if Luke 4:5-6 and Psalm 2:1-4 are true and what will not be cleared up very soon if Isaiah 25:7-9 and Matthew 10:26 are true? :)

"4:5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

4:6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it."
-Luke 4:5-6 (RNKJV)

"2:1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against YHWH, and against his anointed, saying,

2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: YHWH shall have them in derision."
-Psalm 2:1-4 (RNKJV)

"25:7 And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over all nations.

25:8 He will swallow up death in victory; and the Master YHWH will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for YHWH hath spoken it.

25:9 And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our Elohim; we have waited for him, and he will save us: this is YHWH; we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation."
-Isaiah 25:7-9 (RNKJV)

"10:26 Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known."
-Matthew 10:26 (RNKJV)

There might be no big lack of occultic symbolism and occultic messages within video games. Have you ever played Final Fantasy Tactics? What is not basically one big shot at Christ and Christianity?

Have you compared what RD claims with stuff claimed by new age channellers and asked yourself what differs?

Where do you stand when it comes to stuff like new age religion and new age channellers and the house of theosophy and Alice Bailey? You might be a fairly intelligent brother and not have a hard time finding connections between new age religion and the occult and between the occult and organizations like freemasonry.

If you mean how mainstream media or mainstream academia are now trying to get people to question legitimacy of OT scripture by teaching Darwinist theories and Evolution, then that still supports both sides of our discussion.

Mainstream academia and education might actually be teaching universal common descent and suggesting that there are mysteries about human origins and not so subtly suggesting (using shows like Ancient Aliens and box office movies and more?) that we were evolved from early primates by alien beings. What does not fit right in with stuff taught by RD and new age channellers?

With regards to OT scripture, people are not talking about it at all anymore in mainstream media or academia as you so would hope. That’s what’s hankering you.

Not talking about it at all anymore? How often do you watch PBS or the History Channel and how many theology courses have you taken at a university in the 21st century? When are the OT or the Gospels ever discussed without there being a patronizing secular tone like they are myths?

So read carefully what I type, because I am simply restating and paraphrasing best I can from the subreddit here: if it really is true the goal of the Consortium would be to keep humans enslaved as product to contain contagions and use our DNA to extend other primate species lives, then control is priority over us to make us more manageable.

Who wrote stuff like Luke 4:6 and John 14:30 and Psalm 2:1-4 and Isaiah 24:21 if you think the OT and the Gospels are books filled with lies and the products of a world government attempting to gain control over the world?

And if other species do exist outside this planet, then it’d be pretty damn likely that large-scale worldly control would also exist.

Did you ever say whether or not you thought humanoid beings slowly evolved from amino acids on separate planets millions of light years apart?

So I can see why it can be confused for a demonization by the mainstream media, even though in a nutshell it really truly is (just in a different sense than you have in mind).

There might actually not be a Bible based wing on a left or right side of US politics. Do you think Trump and Christ have much in common? Consider how much I was downvoted here and see where it's at in terms of subreddit?

Regarding David, I think you are missing some things that fly right over your head.

You ask why does a IV in line thing automatically discount other supportive and coincidental evidence as lacking? Like what, if so? How many pharoahs did not have military campaigns in Canaan before 1000 BCE and what points to IV more than I or II or III if you think David was a 4th Pharoah named something with half of their name sounding like Dawid?

Why is it that דוד for you only strictly derives from the meaning ‘beloved’ and has no other roots?

When did I say that?

What more concrete evidence of another David existing is there for you? If you choose not to connect the rest of the dots of the whole picture, then what does an incomplete puzzle reveal to you instead?

What do you mean if Jerusalem was destroyed one or more time and yet there is still a whole section of Jerusalem called the City of David that we can visit in 2017 and there is still a huge Temple Mount there that held a Temple attributed to his son using materials laid up by David and if there are still huge walls and an ancient technologically impressive tunnel attributed to people widely considered to be his sons and if the most famous piece of literature in the whole world gives great details concerning David?

If you consider Josephus and see mention of HYCSOS in a 14th section here and consider the Ipuwer Papyrus and see significant stuff pointed out here and consider a video here and consider the Merneptah Stele, the Mesha Stele, the Tel Dan Stele, and the Kurkh Monolith, where does that all fit in with what you think?

Can you rightly blame me if I feel like there is more evidence that Moses was Senmut and Hotep III was a Pharoah of Exodus and Tut was Pharoah's first born son who was killed as a result of a final Exodus plague? Consider linguistics behind Senmut? And see here and here and here if you want details concerning linguistics and timeframes and collaborating artwork and more?

What am I left to believe if we add in a perfect place for a legitimate Exodus crossing that we can view with a satellite viewer for ourselves? A place that has bones and chariot wheels found there and that has even included a column that referred to Egypt, death, water, pharaoh, Edom, the Creator, and Solomon and that has a split rock with water erosion in place to the east and a mountain with a burned and blackened top in place to the east with chain link fencing blocking stuff off? What's not more compelling than anything we can find trying to link an Iblis headed Egyptian false deity to דוד and trying to suggest David was an 18th dynasty Egyptian pharoah?

Who do you figure actually lived in and ruled from and went to war from Jerusalem between 1300 BCE and 1 BCE if you think someone did?

How about we do try to see where evidence takes us and be careful about what we trust though.

I might not really be sure who David and Moses really are, but if we are talking about individuals who are most widely known about as a result of works in the Old Testament, what are we ultimately trying to figure out if not who individuals mentioned in the Old Testament really are?

What suggests that they are not accurately portrayed in Exodus and Leviticus and Numbers and Deuteronomy and in Books of Samuel and Kings? Do mainstream media or mainstream academia not regularly try to get people to question legitimacy of Old Testament scripture?

What's not a stretch trying to tie David to a specific 18th dynasty Egyptian pharoah if a) דוד is a common Hebrew word that has to do with beloved and b) it's only three characters long and c) Hebrew names are used over and over by people (how many people were named Miriam around 33 CE?) and d) there were actually four 18th dynasty pharoahs who shared the same name with eachother and you refer to the 4th and e) you refer to a source that's only trying to link half of a name and a source suggesting that Egyptologists changed a middle consonant to a u? What am I missing? You ultimately think an Egyptian false deity with an Iblis head was called a Hebrew word for beloved and Egyptologists tried to hide it?

Moab and Zobah refer to places in or around Jordan and Syria and you think it's suspicious if both David and an Egyptian pharoah were victorious in war against them? Who do you figure actually lived in and ruled from and went to war from Jerusalem?

How about have patience with me if I'm basically a one man landscaping and pressure washing and etc crew and it's a crazy time of year.

Are you thinking Dawid was a Sinuhe who lived around a Twelfth Dynasty or an Eighteenth Dynasty pharoah or both or neither?

1. Dawid and an Egyptian pharoah are both known for defeating Assyrians and Canaanites? What does that really prove?

2. What does #2 have to do with Dawid if he had several brothers and was not Saul's son at all and actually was regularly hunted by Saul with Saul trying to kill him? A similarity is essentially that there was debate about who should be king after Saul dying? Isn't that a pretty common thing in history in general with kings dying?

3. What does 2 Samuel 8 have to do with Dawid owning Egyptian land? Are you thinking Moab or Philistia or the Euphrates were part of Egypt?

Moses might not have lived before Dawid and I might not have been born in 1983 and we might even be living in a video game world that was created less than 100 years ago with pre-established lore, but if Moses lived hundreds of years before Dawid according to several separate sources, is that not at least somewhat relevant when it comes to deciding if they were both pharoahs with David living before Moses?

Isn't it apparent that Jerusalem actually exists and there were people living there who spoke Hebrew and built walls and dug tunnels and so on? Who are you thinking ruled from Jerusalem and built walls there and dug Hezekiah's tunnel if not a line of kings stemming from Saul and Dawid and Solomon?

So what is connecting the name to a face truly contradicting here, in your own eyes?

What do you mean?

I can't find any evidence of Eden existing... but if you can let's examine it.

What would theoretically be evidence of it existing to you if a physical location isn't above water in 2017 and yet there is artwork from across the world that seems to portray events associated with it?

Whether you think I'm personally way off base and far from reality or not, how about reach out to the Creator directly and sincerely ask the Creator if we should have a mostly secular worldview and if we should stand by Ancient Aliens and new age channelers as good and enlightening sources of info. Me trying to convince you of otherwise in a debate setting might be akin to a Yankees fan debating with a Red Sox fan and trying to turn them into a Yankees fan by debate. What will not actually push them even farther away? But if the big conspiracy if pro-Genesis and pro-Christ, who dropped a ball in the 20th century?

If דוד or Dawid means beloved in Hebrew, what does an Egyptian name sounding like Dhwt really prove?

Consider Nestor and Ereuthalion or even Paris and Achilles? There might be several stories from across the world that concern a weaker opponent overcoming a stronger opponent, but how many similarities are we talking about if a guy threw javelins at Sinuhe which fell harmlessly short and there is an arrow instead of a stone and an axe instead of a sword? And aren't you ultimately suggesting that David was a Sinuhe who lived about 4,000 years ago and also a pharoah who lived about 3500 years ago?

I might be an expert on little to nothing and yet not think it is very logical that Moses was the grandson of David and both were Egyptian pharoahs. Moses might have actually lived like 500 years before David being born. Are you familiar with Hezekiah's tunnel? Who do you think actually dug that if it's in Jerusalem and we can visit it in 2017 and Hezekiah was a descendant of David?

But what from those photos proves it's not? Don't many people write down their own stories and tell them in ways so that they become remembered?

If there is artwork pertaining to Eden stories from various cultures spread across the world from one another, does that not at least suggest there's a common source whether a fictional source or not? It might not prove that Eden really existed and Genesis is true, but if Eden did exist and Genesis is true, what should we expect to find and what do we not find in reality?

What suggests that I refuse to supplement what I'm already aware of with additional sources?

I might have replied in a rush with a crazy schedule lately and wanted you to put stuff into your own words.

So Moustafa Gadalla is essentially claiming that ד (daleth or a Hebrew letter for D?) stems from an Egyptian letter for T? How groundbreaking is that even if it's the case if דוד is actually a regular Hebrew word having to do with beloved that is found in the OT dozens of times in a way not referring to a name at all?

http://lexiconcordance.com/hebrew/1730.html

http://lexiconcordance.com/hebrew/1732.html

Can you help me find where the Story of Sinuhe seems to refer to a story of David and Goliath if Spirit of David claims this?: "Are you aware that the duel between David and Goliath, inserted to enhance the tribal David's reputation as a 'man of war', is an adaptation of a much-admired Egyptian literary work, The Autobiography of Sinhue, describing events that took place 1000 years earlier?"

David might have lived about 500 years after Moses or around 1000 BCE well after an establishment of a nation of Israel and a period of Judges. Does it honestly make much sense to you that David was really a pharoah who reigned around 1450 BCE and Moses was really a pharoah (after David?) who reigned around 1340 BCE if that's what you're proposing? Where does Solomon or Rehoboam or anyone else fit in and who lived in an actual land of Israel if that's the case?

It seems far more logical than simply connecting Moses to Senmut simply only because he had the same name when he lived in the palace. How would you even know whether or not that was a common name during that time?

There might be quite a bit more on links of me than talk concerning a name of Senmut. Who knows how common any name was for sure when it comes to about 3,500 years ago, but we might both figure that there is a conspiracy when it comes to Egyptology in general. How much seems to point to Eden events and nephilim in Egyptian art and yet is suppressed by Egyptologists if you checked out a blog here in detail? And who can diligently study the Great Pyramid for more than a couple hours and come away actually thinking that it was built by Khufu?

There might be a conspiracy going on one way or another and a major conflict between what Christ said and what New Age channelers and the History Channel say and a decision that ultimately has to be made by us when it comes to who to trust.

"8:19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their Elohim? for the living to the dead?

8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
-Isaiah 8:19-20 (RNKJV)

"17:5 Thus saith YHWH; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from YHWH.

17:6 For he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh; but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, in a salt land and not inhabited.

17:7 Blessed is the man that trusteth in YHWH, and whose hope YHWH is.

17:8 For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out her roots by the river, and shall not see when heat cometh, but her leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit.

17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

17:10 I YHWH search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings."

What suggests a Pharoah's name became David or that the Story of Sinuhe refers to David & Goliath if there's an English version here?

Perhaps a truth of a matter regarding Moses is that he was Senmut and Hotep III was a Pharoah of Exodus who would not let Israelites go and Tut was Pharoah's first born son who was killed as a result of a final Exodus plague. Consider linguistics behind Senmut if it means mother's brother and Moses was raised by an earlier Pharoah's daughter and groomed to be heir? See here and here and here if you want details concerning linguistics and timeframes and collaborating artwork and more? Akhen might actually be a first post Exodus pharoah and he might have abandoned former Egyptian religion as a result of the Exodus helping to show how little power there was behind it.

Also, because of his strange features, including elongated head, he is perceived to possibly be not of fully human blood.

Where do nephilim fit in for you? Is it not apparent that they have a strong association with giant beings with elongated heads and does Numbers 13:31-33 not suggests that Israelites were at odds with Canaanite nephilim?

The things you bring up about Daniel gives even more weight to the fact that he was in contact with a Kayeen 'angel' to prepare him with knowledge on things to come.

Do you suppose that Kayeen are a secular evolved humanoid alien species who travel through time and know exactly what future time holds?

What's denying that Jeremiah didn't have his own selfish interests too? His words might bring light to these false scribes, but what makes it in a way that his intentions were purely of good faith and not in any efforts to deceive for his own benefit?

Christ might have backed him up with words recorded in places like Matthew 5:17, but what's really a big foundation for something I claimed if I was basically pointing out Jeremiah 8:8 to support question filled thinking of you and I or something like that?

I might be going off topic, but Jeremiah might have some pretty compelling evidence suggesting the US is like an end times Babylon. How interesting if the US has helped unite the world under the English language and if it's known for tall towers and is the world's leading importer and the United Nations is stationed in NYC and ancient Babel was even taken over by the US in 2003? Would you say it has a mother in England and that it is the hindermost of the nations (see Jeremiah 50:12?) and that it is like a hammer of the world (see Jeremiah 50:23?) and it is known for pride (see Jeremiah 50:31?) and it has mingled people (see Jeremiah 50:37?) and mainstream media deception (see Jeremiah 51:7?) and space programs (see Jeremiah 51:9?) and it is dwelling on many waters (see Jeremiah 51:13?) and that it is kind of known as being the lady of kingdoms with the statue of liberty (see Isaiah 47:5?) and known for being virtually free from military invasion since a founding (Isaiah 47:8?)?

If you were given the opportunity to learn things beyond the human existence, why deny it rather than try to disprove any of it?

I might have had an opportunity to do that myself for quite some time and had stuff come back to bite me in the ass in more way than one, but I might see where you are coming from to an extent and at least hope that you reach out to the Creator directly for personal guidance on a regular basis and never put trust in any created being over the Creator.

If you and I seem to agree that those in power have manipulated society quite a lot, what then is your own take on them possibly trying to get you to take the wrong side (the Kayeen angels)?

I might be about as cautious as a person comes and use words like maybe and perhaps and might a lot and ask questions quite a bit as a result of being extra careful not to claim something that is untrue. There might ultimately be no good time to stop learning and no good time to stop trying to fill in details when it comes to truth, but what am I left to believe if Christ is backed up by first hand witnesses of miraculous signs & wonders and by dozens of fulfilled prophecies documented several hundred years in advance and by intense personal experiences of my own? Combine how much seems to be in His favor with how much association there seems to be between freemasonry and a novus ordo seclorum and Egyptian symbolism and how much stuff seems to be suppressed when it comes to Eden evidence and flood evidence and nephil evidence and Exodus evidence and dinosaur evidence and more? If we are left with a choice to trust either Christ Himself or new age channelers combined with the History Channel, shouldn't a choice be fairly easy?

Can you help me find some evidence that Moses and David were those two if I've seen little to nothing outside linking some names that could be much more similar?

People might be able to get respect from others by being associated with the Creator and often take advantage of that, but is it not true that tens of thousands of Israelites either did or did not see several miraculous signs and wonders including a parting of the Red Sea?

And what's lacking collaborative physical evidence that we can look into for ourselves in 2017 if you already saw stuff involving a channeled pathway through mountainous terrain ending at a beach before an area of the Red Sea that's littered with bones and chariot wheels? What's limited to a Red Sea crossing point if you watch a video here in full? Are you at least a little impressed if you take 12 minutes or so to watch a video there and see a split rock with water erosion next to it and a mountain with a burned and blackened top? Notice how much chain link fencing there is? Who is trying to suppress evidence for Exodus being true and legitimate?

Daniel might have indeed been in contact with one or more angel. Consider Daniel 9:21 and notice how close it is to Daniel 9:24-27? What would that take away from though? What are we left to believe if Daniel 9:24-27 was written hundreds of years before the first century and yet it has prophecy concerned with a Mashiach or Messiah that points precisely to 33 CE and there are also many other collaborating prophecies that are backing up Yahushua/Jesus?

What do you take away from Jeremiah 8:9 if you go onto 8:10? It might be making a point concerned with what you yourself are saying, but when should we throw out the baby with the bathwater even if there are corrupt priests and prophets that have tried to mislead people to their own benefit?

Paul might have actually persecuted Christians and then acted like he had a miraculous conversion and started proclaiming a message that was in opposition to words of Christ Himself and Peter and John and James.

You might be a deep and critical thinking brother. Are you completely buying what RD is selling and if so, why? What is not essentially a secular religion that is also being promoted by new age channelers and the History Channel?

I might actually not put absolute trust in either the LXX or the DSS myself or treat them like they are original flawless texts, but how different are they from each other overall and what is not ultimately backed up by Matthew 5:17-18 if they were around in the first century?

Whether they are 100% flawless or not, how interesting if there's artwork and history from across the world backing up Eden events and the flood and nephilim and there's even a perfect geographical location for a legitimate Exodus crossing containing bones and chariot wheels that we can conveniently view with a satellite viewer in 2017?

And what are we left to believe in regards to Yahushua/Jesus if there's prophecy from well before Him being born that backs Him up? Is the Tanakh/OT at least 2,000 years old if mainstream Jews and mainstream Christians use the Masoretic Text and we can collaborate it with the LXX and Dead Sea Scrolls?
If it is, who chooses what they are named (see Zechariah 6:11-13) and where they are born (see Micah 5:2) and who they are born to (see Genesis 49:9-12 and 1 Chr. 17:4-14 and Psalm 132:10-14 and Isaiah 7:14-16 and Isaiah 11:1-10 and Jeremiah 23:5-8 and Jeremiah 33:14-22) and where they grow up (see Isaiah 9:1-7 and then compare 1 Kings 8:26-27 with 1 Kings 9:10-13) and chooses for their associates to abandon them (see Psalm 31:11 and Psalm 41:9) and an amount of money they are betrayed for (see Zechariah 11:10-13) and their method of torture and death (see Psalm 22 and Psalm 34:19-20 and Psalm 69:16-21 and Isaiah 25:8-11 and Isaiah 49:13-16 and Isaiah 50:2-6 and Isaiah 53 and Zechariah 12:10 and Zechariah 13:4-9) and chooses to have the darkness at noon while they are being killed (see Amos 8:9-10) and chooses to have an earthquake when they are killed (see Psalm 18:3-7) and even chooses to resurrect and specific timing of their death and resurrection from hundreds of years in advance (see Psalm 16:8-11, Psalm 68:18-20, Hosea 6:1-3, Jonah 1:17 and Daniel 9:24-27)?

How extraordinary if Daniel 9:24-27 was written hundreds of years before the first century and yet it points right to 33 CE from a decree of Artexerses using Chaldean weeks of years or seven year periods?

How about we at least make a stand for Yahushua as Messiah even if we can go back and forth on details forever. What do we have to lose? "3:16 For YHWH so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

Let's say you have control of over 1/4 the world's population. How do you guide such a large mass of people without succumbing to distorting the truth to keep them in place? Control easily becomes prioritized over truth in such a scenario, and I imagine it would be difficult to abstain from such a sacrifice. So can you see how the truth can easily become shaped from such a standpoint?

We might ultimately think quite a bit alike and see things in a very similar way even if we spend more time sharpening iron against iron than celebrating agreements. What has been attacked more than truth? Consider Jeremiah 8:8 if you doubt that Jeremiah thought pretty similarly to us himself? But when should we throw out the baby with the bathwater? Perhaps people came along and distorted words of Moses after him passing on, but how much could he easily get away with when it comes to convincing contemporaries of himself of huge public miracles if they never actually occurred? Consider the Ipuwer Papyrus or see significant stuff pointed out here if someone suggests to you there's no outside confirmation concerned with Exodus plagues from Egyptians left behind in Egypt?

Does it make sense to you that dealing with more people almost always means a greater chance for distortion of truth for the sake of profits, pleasing people, gaining praise, and maintaining control?

Control over many people might very much generally lead to more power and profits and praise than control over few people, but what's more critical of emperors and pharisees than the Gospels? And who's done more than Christ when it comes to speaking up for widows and orphans and hungry people and cold people and prisoners and outcasts?

What's considered mainstream, according to you?

Mainstream might be a relative term really, but is there any philosophy that got a bigger push from media and academia in the 20th century than Darwinian evolution?

Is the RNKJV Bible not considered mainstream at all?

You mean a KJV? I'm not the biggest fan of a KJV or even RNKJV Bible myself and options are kind of lacking when it comes to quoting ancient scripture in English perhaps. When will you ever find a Bible with 1 Enoch and Jubilees in it? Consider how high they are here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_Scrolls#Biblical_books_found

Wouldn't you think that the greater the scale of an audience, the more easily corruptible something becomes?

What do you mean?

And why would the two above techniques I listed not be applied for any form of sensitive truthful information to keep you away from it?

They might very well be. What seems to be treated like evil nonsense and also seems to be rejected by me? Think about how many shows there are recently that deal with mediums if you are getting at stuff related to me trying to honor Leviticus 19:31?

If a civilization's citizens need to be glued together under a corrupt society, how do you think they will best accomplish that?

Mainstream academia and mainstream media and mainstream religious institutions might be like a great trifecta. Can you find any yeshiva or seminary that trains religious leaders to preach truth regarding Genesis 6:4?

Who trusts mainstream media and mainstream academia less than me?

Why would humans have lived longer in the past? Consider goo.gl/wRu3w1 and also check out amber bubbles and think about how much oxygen there was? There might have been a completely different atmosphere with a layer of water around the world that helped protect people from UV rays or something like that.

I might not agree with Kent Hovind on everything, but did someone really want him shut up if he is a very conservative clean cut type Christian and he went out spending much of his own time and money giving seminars and having public debates and trying to help spread information to people and yet he ended up in federal prison for almost a decade under bunk charges?

Mainstream media might very much have a power to help befuddle things. How about we carefully dissect what is said if there is often truth mixed with lies. Who is denying that there are humans with DNA in a nephilim related way, but doesn't a Daily Mail title prod people more toward RD and evolved alien farmer type ideas than 1 Enoch and created fallen angel type ideas?

They make a lot of parallels with these scriptures in that game, encourage you to read up on it. This would prove both your point that mainstream media is really leaning towards anti-YHWH and my point that it's being done on purpose to keep us from looking at the real truth behind it. Don't you think? Let's keep digging at it though.

There might very much be a connection between 1 Enoch and between ancient aliens and ancient religions. Compare Genesis 6:4 and 1 Enoch and Jubilees with ancient Sumerian and Babylonian and Egyptian and Greek and Far East stuff and American stuff and more? Consider Josephus and a first section of a third chapter here? What was he not directly linking to Greek titans? We might really be getting somewhere. Don't you refer to two points that are really points by both of us if you likely see some anti-YHWH related stuff yourself and I very much think stuff is being done on purpose to try to keep people from looking into real truth behind stuff? How about I PM you when it comes to devil contact and demonic oppression related stuff. :)

I might have a hard time proving where whales did or did not come from without a time machine, but what do you think is true when it comes to where they come from?

Is it ever wrong to consider the possibility that: 1. We just haven't discovered anything to prove it yet and perhaps they could be so deeply buried, 2. Certain organisms were brought to this planet from other worlds, 3. They have been concealed from our sciences for whatever reason.

1. Perhaps it's almost never wrong to consider a possibility, but if there have been several dinosaur bones found from 10 or so distinct groups and nothing at all found in terms of bones from outside those 10 or so groups, then what are we left to believe? Why would there be 10 or so distinct groups and little to nothing outside that even if punctuated equilibrium is closer than phyletic gradualism? Did evolution happen rapidly from one generation to another with long million year sequences of no change at all? What really makes sense? Doesn't it seem like there are secular focused scientists who will kick and scratch to try to not believe Genesis 1 is true regardless of if all evidence points to it being true? 2. That might be more valid than many other ideas and be getting somewhere, but what's the difference between 10 dinosaur kinds being created out of nothing and 10 pre-evolved dinosaur types being brought over from another planet? What if Genesis 1 is true? 3. Missing links concealed from mainstream media and mainsteam academia? Who would try to do that if both try hard on a regular basis to back up Darwin?

As much as a thoughtco.com page tries, is there really any fossil or dinosaur type mentioned that does not fit into a group of a about 10 dinosaur types that a small child could make made up names for?

As far as comparing the Septuagint with the Masoretic Text, you might be preaching to a choir in a sense or at least talking to someone who has already studied the LXX in some detail and made similar points even recently myself. Consider a chart here? Now how about we compare stuff together and try to see where there are some interesting differences. There might be quite a bit that the LXX does to support me even more than the Masoretic Text does. If the Masoretic Text was changed in a deceptive way, it was changed in ways to hide evidence for giants and nephilim and fallen angels and even a future deception involving aliens maybe. Compare 10:9 here? Was Nimrod simply mightly or was he a nephil or nephil hunter or? Compare 11:31 here? Seeds or arms of both or neither if this is likely a future event and is just after mysterious ships showing up with war looking imminent? Compare with Daniel 2:43 if it suggests a last corrupt world kingdom will include non-humans trying to mingle themselves with the seed of man?

As far as if death is a champion of progress and humans are the result of a common ancestor that left trees and took to walking upright? Why should I believe that if I should for some reason? Why would I not choose to stand by Genesis 1 being true if there is one example after another when it comes to corrupt secret societies having ties to worshiping the devil and there is one example of another of suppressed information that helps support Genesis and Exodus as being literal and legitimate?

Is there even a legitimate homo erectus at all? :)

"Homo erectus is still in the textbooks. Homo erectus used to be called Java man, then they changed it to Pithecanthropus erectus, and now called Homo erectus. It was found by Dr. Dubois, a Dutch anatomist who went to Indonesia purposely, to try to find missing links. He hired a bunch of prison convicts to go dig for him. He wasn't even there when they found it. What they found was an ape's skull cap, three human teeth, and a thigh bone found a year later 50 feet away. Dubois put them all together and said: 'We have a missing link here.' You don't even know those animal bones go together. Three teeth, thigh bone, and a skull cap from an ape!"
-http://www.wiseoldgoat.com/papers-creation/hovind-seminar_part2b_2007.html

There might be some DNA in humans that's related to fallen angels and nephilim, but as far as an idea of panspermia? See what you come up with if you search panspermia on google? Dailymail and Scientific American and NASA and space.com and National Geographic and nature.com referenced in first page or two? How much more mainstream can we get and what is not ultimately even the main focus of an Ancient Aliens television show on the History Channel? If you think there are powers that be who are trying to deceive us with mainstream media and mainstream academia, then where do all of these fit in?

Have you read much from 1 Enoch? Consider here in detail if you want a 1 Enoch take on alien visitors and consider a 15:8 here if you are curious where demonic spirits come from? Did we already discuss Mt Hermon and giant Lebanon stones?

As far as if dinosaur types just appeared out of nowhere one day, see a reference to 8577 next to whales here and click and see concordance reference concerned with dragons or dinosaurs? If there are about 10 distinct dinosaur kinds when it comes to all dinosaur fossils that have been found, where is a slow buildup or transition between kinds? Can we walk into a museum and see bones from a half flying dinosaur or a bones from a half water dinosaur? Is there a transition skeleton building up to a spikey turtle looking dinosaur or a trihorn dinosaur or a mohawk back dinosaurs? Isn't it apparent that there are about 10 kinds of dinosaurs with slight variations within kinds and a clear gap or absence of missing links between kinds if we approach the fossil record itself in an unbiased way?

As far as if creatures came out of water to become mammals and then two deer like creatures crawled back into water and had mutated babies that eventually became whales? How ridiculous does that sound to you? :) That might be the best mainstream academia has come up with from a secular Darwinist approach. Perhaps proof comes down to definition, but could it be that the Creator made several separate kinds of creatures and made whales in water without slow gradual evolution and did not need to make mammals crawl into water and have mutated babies to produce whales?

Proving Exodus as true might not prove Genesis as true, but what was not written in transition or as a followup to Genesis if you compare Genesis 50 with Exodus 1?

Even if it was a real event - are you sure you are interpreting the meaning behind each story correctly?

Not at all and I'm very much a work in progress with much to learn perhaps.

How would Genesis not relate to what our near future holds, if that really were the case?

Can you elaborate?

And isn't Exodus sort of explained in this subreddit...? You really ought to read the posts here, man.

Did you see stuff I replied to RD? How about help me figure out what I'm missing if they've provided little to nothing to me in terms of evidence for Akhen being Moses outside of trying to linguistically link names as different as Panehesy and Phinehas? Phinehas might have actually not even became a high priest until decades after an exodus from Egypt in days after Israel crossing over into land of Israel. Do you yourself figure that nephilim were taken out of existence in days before Moses? Where do you claim Hyksos fit in and who do you claim persecuted Israelites as a Pharoah in days of Moses and chased Israelites across the Red Sea?

I don't claim all aliens are bad at all even if there is evidence for more than one corrupt group and evidence for deception involving outwardly benign beings and more wolf in sheep's clothing type beings. There might be many benevolent angels/aliens and even evidence (including a blog of me with ancient artwork?) suggesting that a flying craft and benevolent angels were used to guard the tree of life and evidence that Elijah himself was taken up by a flying vehicle, but what if there are waves of deception planned and we should be very careful who we trust? Is there really any alien humanoid created or born on another planet who is not an angel?

How about don't trust me and do regularly reach out to the Creator personally and weigh stuff on a regular basis. I might have issues myself and be far from perfect myself. How about we take this to heart:

"17:5 Thus saith YHWH; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from YHWH.

17:6 For he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh; but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, in a salt land and not inhabited.

17:7 Blessed is the man that trusteth in YHWH, and whose hope YHWH is.

17:8 For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out her roots by the river, and shall not see when heat cometh, but her leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit.

17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

17:10 I YHWH search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings."
-Jeremiah 17:5-10 (RNKJV)

"12:34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

12:35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.

12:36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.

12:37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned."
-Matthew 12:34-37 (RNKJV)

"6:43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

6:44 For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes.

6:45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh."
-Luke 6:43-45 (RNKJV)

How does one come to a logical understanding about about anything then?

Why not at least say something like I think or according to so and so if you don't know for sure? I might say maybe and perhaps and might and ask questions a bit too much, but is there not a solid middle ground somewhere?

What do you have in terms of evidence that humans are fused from genes of humanoid aliens called Kayeen and genes from a group accurately called homo erectus? What do we even have in terms of evidence for a homo erectus group itself if you consider here?

So why should we consider things blasphemous without even examining the evidence?

We have a loving Creator who helped warn people against receiving knowledge certain ways maybe. When will it ever ultimately be to our benefit if we use a Ouija board or Tarot cards to try to figure out truth of the universe even if we very much can learn stuff with them? I might have actually got highly involved with a complex form of anagram divination in the past and tried to reach out the devil and the queen of heaven with anagrams and then got severely attacked and been demonically oppressed or something like that for about 40 days and been hospitalized for about 10 days. What is not ultimately for our own benefit when it comes to what He asks of us and what will not ultimately backfire against us if we reject what He asks of us?

"8:19 And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their Elohim? for the living to the dead?

8:20 To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
-Isaiah 8:19-20 (RNKJV)

There might be something similar to natural selection that has to do with adapting to surroundings, but how much has really changed if there were 10 dinosaur kinds on day five and there has never been more than 10 dinosaur kinds? Do you think that whales are the product of deer like creatures crawling back into water and evolving to become whales if mainstream academia stands by that?

If you showed me his skull or even some DNA for that matter it might make more sense.

How would I theoretically prove it was Adam's DNA or skull? If you want something outside artwork and linguistics backing up Genesis and Exodus being legitimate, how interesting if there's a perfect place for an Exodus crossing that we can view with a satellite viewer for ourselves here? What's not even moreso if there are bones and chariot wheels found there and there was even a column put there in ancient time that refers to Egypt, death, water, pharaoh, Edom, the Creator, and Solomon?

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/red-sea-multi-3.jpg

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/red_sea_crossing.htm

Do we not have the free will to make our own mistakes and correct them ourselves? At least I think I do, and I would certainly hope that I do. So what does sentient really mean to you?

Yes? I might have thought of sentient and thought of being conscious or something like that, but what if Genesis contains true history and is not just a book trying to teach lessons and morals?

So think about this: how did you arrive at being a conspiracy theorist non-Pauline Messianic Jew in the first place? You must have used your sense of logic in understanding the histories and science brought forth to you at some point to arrive there, did you not?

Yes maybe, but perhaps it's not necessarily a perfect title and I'm generally weary of calling myself after titles.

As far as NESARA and a world currency established by aliens or angels? What is not falling right into place according to prophecy when that is done? nesaranews.blogspot.com is not really saying much for or against NESARA itself on a main page and I'm not real sure what is intended to be for or against NESARA maybe, but what is not sketchy one way or another if aliens show up and act like they have a plan to help us even if they act like they are against rich bankers and oil people and warmongers? What will make for a deceptive charade if there are not obviously corrupt scapegoats to point a finger at? Familiar with an Illuminati card game and with a concept of a white knight in a conspiracy circle sense? Consider here if you think Alex Jones and Ron Paul are good guys who want to help expose truth to us and lead us down a good path?

So please tell me: what good do you see in this world if you see none in someone such as himself?

You mean someone who threatened to fucking broom me and run me aground as a result of me questioning what they claimed? :) As far as good? Who has stood up more for love and and forgiveness and mercy and kindness and truth than Yahushua?

We were fused from Kayeen genetics with Erectus.

How would you even theoretically know that? Aren't you putting a lot of trust in someone on the internet?

How many times do you think spontaneous generation has occurred in the universe if you think everyone descends from a one or more collection of amino acids? Even if you think aliens toyed with genetics, you might ultimately be thinking that death and survival of the fittest are champions of progress that helped lead to aliens being advanced beings in a first place.

Are you sure that the Creator did not personally make Adam without having him born from a mother? What do you consider extra-biblical archaeological evidences if you already saw a third post here and scrolled down and saw one example after another from various cultures seemingly attempting to portray Eden or things that took place there?

What are you thinking when it comes to quantum computers and what is there to say about education costs? There might be scams associated with making money and keeping people intellectually suppressed even inside universities and much we can learn from simply watching youtube videos and reading stuff online in 2017 anyway.

Several things are lining up in our lifetime but do you ever question beyond what you already know about it?

I might ultimately be learning on a regular basis and regularly questioning what I really know. Can you quote one thing I've adamantly claimed one way or another? Do you assume I was born and raised in a family that was church going let alone a family of conspiracy theorist non-Pauline Messianic Jews? I might have actually thought more like you in the past and came to see more and more evidence for a corrupt new age agenda concerned with fallen angels trying to get people to believe they were good guy primate evolving aliens.

What did I say that suggested that I did not think world currencies were corrupt? Have you looked into NESARA though? If you think there are good guy aliens who are going to show up and make stuff better with a cashless society using a mark on our body or something like that, what is not ultimately a trap from deceptive fallen angels trying to act like good guys?

Do you really think humans slowly evolved from simple molecules?

If you laid out all dinosaur bones in separate piles, there might be like 10 distinct piles with a glaring gap between them. What if we really do have a Creator who created Adam without using a random number generator and death isn't the grand champion that brought us to be through survival of the fittest?

"'Modern apes ... seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans ... is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter.'
(Lyall Watson, Ph.D., Evolutionist)"

What do you ultimately propose has happened in history if you at least kind of speak as if you believe in the Creator and yet have explanations or theories that hint of a secular pov when it comes to history? Who do you refer to here and who is really a good guy if they are providing outright lies? "Advanced beings would be the ones trying to evolve and build us up by including cautionary barriers in these texts as a means to not completely destroy ourselves."

Consider how many cultures remember a name of Noah or something very similar to that if you doubt Genesis refers to real people and real events? And consider here if Adam means red and it's Egyptians art that's essentially a red man and red woman who look like twins and they are accepting something from a tree together with an opened eye and a snake image to the left? What is limited to a handful of Hebrew texts or even a few cultures if you consider here in great detail and notice how widespread stuff is whether it comes to a serpent and fruit event or tree of life and cherubim guardian event or more? See images starting around a third post?

What religion is even kind of comparable to Abrahamic ones when it comes to evidence for fulfilled prophecy if you consider all I just referred to and more? Does it not seem as if several things just referred to are lining up in our lifetime whether we view some stuff differently or not? And does talk of us having a currency and supporting our currency with currency of aliens not hint to you of an end times deception involving a mark on our body or cashless society or something like that? Is RD a proponent of NESARA and new age channelers? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NESARA

What are we going to stop with handguns when it comes to flying saucer using greys and nordics and reptilians whether we trust Luke 4:5-6 and Isaiah 24:21 and Psalm 2:1-3 as good or not?

Sunken cities might back up the flood being legit without being evidence that humans lived farther than 6,000 years ago. What if there really was a great flood around 4,500 years ago and several cities remained underwater afterwards?

Doesn't it seem like mainstream media and mainstream academia are generally trying to a) push people farther away from taking Genesis literally and b) pushing people toward believing in an old universe and universal common descent macroevolution and c) pushing people to pridefully embrace stuff like abortion and sexual abominations? Whether you personally consider those wrong or not, look at trends and ask yourself what is not in total opposition to what the Tanakh and the Gospels preach?
What could not easily be going in an opposite direction with reins of media and academia at your control for centuries? Where do you feel like US dollar bills fit in if they reference a novus ordo seclorum next to occultic symbolism associated with freemasonry and Egypt?

Don't you think we should take the Tanakh and what Yahushua taught very literally if you consider how much has come to pass accurately and how much is being fulfilled right around 2017? What is a better test of divine knowledge than prophecy? This might be far from complete, but how about consider a few things with me for a moment.

1) Matthew 24:14 (RNKJV)

24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.

If a homeless Guy in a tiny country was speaking of a gospel being preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations and an end coming afterwards, who would have guessed that what He said would come to pass? But what is not getting closer and closer to being fulfilled on a regular basis? There might be some Amazon tribes out of touch with modern civilization in 2016, but how far off are we?

2) Daniel 12:4 (RNKJV)

12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.

Consider words there and then consider planes and trains and automobiles and the internet? Is there any time in the past that would make more sense than modern time? And what specifically could run to and fro be referring to?

3) Nahum 2:4 (RNKJV)

2:4 The chariots shall rage in the streets, they shall justle one against another in the broad ways: they shall seem like torches, they shall run like the lightnings.

How interesting if this is referring to a time referred to as the day of his preparation? What would a man say well over two thousand years ago to describe modern automobiles and highways using ancient Hebrew or Aramaic?

4) 2 Peter 3:3-4 and 3:8 (RNKJV)

3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,

3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.

3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with YHWH as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.

Does this sound like Peter thought Christ's return was imminent? There might also be stuff between there that hints of people rejecting the flood in the last days. If a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years are as a day to the Creator then what does that mean for us and is there any clue in Old Testament prophecy to help us out?

5) Hosea 6:2-3 (RNKJV)

6:2 After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.

6:3 Then shall we know, if we follow on to know YHWH: his going forth is prepared as the morning; and he shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth.

Hmmm. Is this meaning to hint of timing of return of about two thousand years after the crucifixion? And is there a first and second coming referred to with the latter and former rain unto the earth?

6) Consider Barnabas 15:4-5 here?

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/barnabas-lightfoot.html

And then see and consider how close we are to 6,000 according to the Tanakh?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_creation#Masoretic

How interesting if there were people living over two thousand years ago who expected something big to happen around 2017? Is that not the case if we are living around year 6,000 according to reckoning of ancients and ancients thought something big was due to happen around year 6,000?

7) Consider Talmud Sanhedrin 97 starting around a 33rd footnote of 97a and read until you get to about a 1st footnote of 97b?

http://halakhah.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_97.html

More confimation when it comes to Barnabas stuff especially? How interesting if even Christ rejecting Jews expected a Messiah about two thousand years ago and also expected a Messianic era to last two thousand years? What is not pointing right to a lifetime of us?

Add in Matthew 24:7 and recent wars and race conflict and diseases and quakes and divorces and technology and more? Even if someone is an atheist or has little to no allegiance to Abrahamic religion, who can rightly deny that we are living in a prophetically significant time and who can rightly deny that Yahushua has prophecy on His side?

There might be much that I'm understanding incorrectly. How about we try to learn on a regular basis.

Would it make much sense for a corrupt cabal over world governments to want us believe stuff like Luke 4:5-6 and Psalm 2:1-3 and Isaiah 24:21? What would not be blowing their cover? Wouldn't there be revolutionaries wanting to stand up against corrupt governments whether those existed or not?

What seems to conflict with what I've said when it comes to Lake Chuitzeo or Greenland ice sheets? Consider how close Barringer Crater is to stuff like Grand Canyon and Petrified Forest National Park and Monument Valley and even Yellowstone? Could it be the result of something that caused fountains of the great deep to be broken up and ultimately something that led to the flood? How suspicious if it even has a square-like shape and was caused by something that was shiny and metallic?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/Meteor_Crater_-Arizona.jpg/800px-Meteor_Crater-_Arizona.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Meteorcrater.jpg/800px-Meteorcrater.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Meteor_Crater_08_2010_151.JPG/800px-Meteor_Crater_08_2010_151.JPG

What do you consider to be a pileup of information leading to advanced civilizations if there is little to nothing in terms of human civilization that's older than Sumer and an Old Kingdom Egypt?

"A long preliminary period is not supported by archaeology." "There was no transition whatsoever between the ancient civilizations and any primitive forebearers. They were at their peak from the beginning." "...Great cities, enormous temples, pyramids of overwhelming size. Colossal statues with tremendous expressive power. Luxurious tunnels and tombs. Splendid streets flanked by magnificent sculpture, perfect drainage systems. A decimal system at the very start. A ready-made writing, already perfected. A well established naming system (in which each Pharaoh had as many as five names). Society already divided into specialist classes. An army, civil service and hierarchy minutely organized. A court exhibiting all the indications of well-defined precedence and form." -http://s8int.com/oldindex.html

It makes more sense to me that allowing these shows to air is simply damage control for them, keeping us from understanding our own reality.

We might essentially agree there. Isn't it like certain things were suppressed for hundreds or thousands of years and then the internet helped stuff go viral and deceptive powers tried to hurry up and cover their ass when it came to alien related stuff and oopart related stuff and freemasonry related stuff and more? But what is not taking a very secular minded Genesis-rejecting twist when it comes to Ancient Aliens and trying to make it seem like we are the product of aliens tampering with primates by experimenting with genetics? When is there ever an episode that does not try to reinforce that with a final conclusion? How often is it suggested that there are UFO using aliens who are actually fallen angels and how often is it suggested that there are fallen angels with a grip over mainstream media and media academia? People might make memes, but wouldn't you guess that most people believe humanoid aliens exist and that Ancient Aliens is helping to reinforce a belief in that while helping lead people to reject Genesis and reject Christ? How many people are aware of nephilim and 1 Enoch and Jubilees or giant stone blocks next to an alleged landing place of fallen angels? If there is a main conspiracy that is pro-Genesis and pro-Christ, then did someone drop a ball in the 20th century?

What's not actually there or at least hinted at when it comes to several separate kinds of creatures being created with an intent for them to bring forth variety after their kinds?

"1:11 And Elohim said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.

1:12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and Elohim saw that it was good."
-Genesis 1:11-12 (RNKJV)

"1:24 And Elohim said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

1:25 And Elohim made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and Elohim saw that it was good."
-Genesis 1:24-25 (RNKJV)

Perhaps literature as a whole is generally not interpreted to the best of people's understanding and we should try to learn more on a regular basis.

Your first option or whatever makes a lot more sense to me as a result of several things including stuff associated with how anti-Genesis and anti-Yahushua mainstream academia and mainstream media tend to be and how much stuff like Ancient Aliens has been playing on the History Channel lately maybe. What suggests this is not true?:

"4:5 And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

4:6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it."
-Luke 4:5-6 (RNKJV)

"2:1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?

2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against YHWH, and against his anointed, saying,

2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: YHWH shall have them in derision."
-Psalm 2:1-4 (RNKJV)

"24:21 And it shall come to pass in that day, that YHWH shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth."
-Isaiah 24:21 (RNKJV)

"25:7 And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over all nations.

25:8 He will swallow up death in victory; and the Master YHWH will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for YHWH hath spoken it.

25:9 And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our Elohim; we have waited for him, and he will save us: this is YHWH; we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation."
-Isaiah 25:7-9 (RNKJV)

Creation and evolution are not mutually exclusive at all and evolution happens more rapidly than academia even gives it credit for perhaps. If you consider the fossil record, does it not suggest that there are several separate family trees and suggest that separate kinds of creatures were created to bring forth variety after their kinds? There might be about 10 distinct dinosaur kinds that a small child can give made up names to with cursory information. Long Neck and Trihorn and Mohawk Back and T Rex and Raptor and Unihorn and Flare Neck and and Spikey Turtle and Water Dino and Flying Dino? Where are the missing links between dinosaur types if there are some?

And as far as uniformitarianism and if assuming starting points and constant rates through all time can lead to incorrect results in interpreting data? What's not going to be off when it comes to something like carbon dating if it assumes the amount of 14C being produced in the atmosphere has always been equal to the amount being removed? If that's not the case at all and the biosphere just prior to the flood had 500 times more carbon in living organisms than today and fossil fuels are primarily the result of the flood, then what is not going to be way off base? Doesn't it seem illogical to assume the flood never occurred to try to figure out if the flood ever occurred? What does actual tangible evidence say in regards to if there was a much different atmosphere with more plant life in the past if there are fossilized forests in Antarctica and if amber bubbles have far more oxygen than the atmosphere in 2017? And if there's evidence the speed of light is slowing down and it's even been stopped in a laboratory setting, do you see a way that uniformitarian assumptions could lead to incorrect conclusions?

I read almost nothing that was said as a result of Leviticus 19:31 and more maybe, but do you think everyone descends from a single spontaneously generated ancestor or do you think there was spontaneous generation more than once or something else? What do you ultimately think is true when it comes to an origin of life?

Do you have an example of something from math or geology or physics or astronomy that you find particularly compelling? There might be a lot of stuff that is resting on uniformitarianism assumptions.

There are some so called ooparts that clearly suggest that mainstream timeframes are off base perhaps, but what really existed before Sumer and an Old Kingdom of Egypt as far as human civilization? Do you think everyone including humans and dinosaurs and an RD species and plants and distant humanoid aliens descend from a single spontaneously generated ancestor?

And there are actually high ranking freemasons and others who try to make the world more secular while worshipping someone at the same time maybe. Consider a third world war section here and if you wonder what would be a motive of wanting to?

I was getting at us being weary of trusting anyone outside the Creator as in anyone besides the Creator and I came across wrong perhaps.

Can I ask what seems to go back much farther than Sumer and an Old Kingdom of Egypt when it comes to human civilization if those came into existence about 5,000 years ago?

What if there really was a global flood? Aren't there some very interesting similarities between distant cultures if you see a chart here? How telling if Noah even had his name remain virtually unchanged in places as isolated as Hawaii (called Nu-u?), the Sudan (Nuh?), China (Nu-Wah?), the Amazon region (Noa?), Phrygia (Noe?) and among the Hottentots (Noh and Hiagnoh?).

And is the world lacking geologic evidence for a global flood if Genesis 7:11 suggests water came from something called the fountains of the great deep and you consider western USA? What's not pretty compelling evidence if Yellowstone contains 80% of the world's geysers and Snake River Plain is essentially flowing from it to the Channeled Scablands? Consider western USA as a whole if it's essentially a land of sedimentary rock and contains Grand Canyon and Great Salt Lake and Monument Valley and Rainbow Bridge and Petrified Forest National Park and Algodones Dunes and the Morrison Formation and the Ogallala Aquifer and more? What is truly the result of several coincidental events scattered millions of years apart?

Noah might have been somewhat safe across the world from Yellowstone around a modern day Turkey, but if you want geologic evidence for the whole world being submerged, consider strata in itself and fossils as a whole with an emphasis on polystrate fossils and mountain fossils and things known as ooparts? See here and here and here and here?

There might be some decent points by you associated with a handful of dinosaurs slipping through cracks that I basically stand by myself, but what fits in with mainstream academia if they are said to have went extinct almost 70 million years ago? Is it not apparent that there is a widespread conspiracy that is trying to pull wool over eyes of us and get us to think the world is older than it really is if dinosaurs were known to live in days of Marco Polo and there's even evidence they have lived much more recently?

Do you think that Kayeen are humanoid aliens with two eyes and a nose and a mouth and four limbs and that they evolved from simple molecules on a planet light years away and that they happened to come across another planet with humanoid beings with two eyes and a nose and a mouth and four limbs who evolved from simple molecules? Could it be that there is actually a Creator who created angels and humans with humanoid forms as a result of realizing that they were an excellent avatar for inhabiting three dimensional space and that there is a conspiracy by fallen angels to try to make us view things in a more secular way and deny the Creator? How suspicious if US dollar bills reference a novus ordo seclorum next to occultic symbolism associated with freemasonry and Egypt? Are there legitimate Latin definitions here?

Thanks for being as peaceful and friendly as you are. Are we not ultimately family and on a curious and interesting journey together one way or another? :)

How about we discuss stuff in peace and have love for RD and eachother whether I'm personally trusting of them or not?

I might actually reject Paul as a true apostle and not be a big proponent of Pauline Christianity or Catholicism and reject much of "the bible" myself.

Compare nephilim and the Book of Enoch with stuff concerned with Sumer and Babylon and Egypt and Greece and India and even the Americas? There might be a common thread that has to do with fallen angels/aliens coming to the world and teaching stuff to humans and producing titan-like offspring with women. RD might likely not even disagree with me there.

But if you think everyone evolved from one collection of amino acids over billions of years, where did a humanoid form originally come from? Would it make a lot of sense that humanoids with two eyes and a nose and a mouth and four limbs would evolve from amino acids on two separate planets that are light years apart? Could it be that there is a Common Designer who created angels and humanity who thought a humanoid form was an excellect avatar for inhabiting three dimensional space?

Consider an option C here? What if evolution is true to an extent and yet there's not universal common descent stemming back to one collection of amino acids? What does the fossil record say if Stephen J. Gould himself said The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology? If there's a degree of gradualism commonly attributed to Darwin that's virtually nonexistent in the fossil record and there are glaring gaps that led to people like Gould rejecting phyletic gradualism and grasping punctuated equilibrium instead, then what should that tell us? What if microevolution occurs and actually happens quite rapidly? How many dog breeds existed 500 years ago? There might be animals considered prehistoric on the Nile mosaic of Palestrina and on a multitude of examples of ancient art.

How about very much question if I'm trustworthy and be weary of trusting anyone outside the Creator in general.

If the devil masquerades as an angel of light, does it not make sense that he and servants of him would talk to people as if they had helping answers to problems? There might be waves of false Messiah deception with Kayeen related beings who will be used as scapegoats by a later more deceptive false Messiah.

What knowledge outside of a Bible would I have to supplement a theory that RD is actually a deceiver? He might have suggested humans have been evolving for millions or billions of years, but what makes sense about that if humans and dinosaurs have coexisted even recently? Consider stuff here in detail? There might be several animals not even limited to dinosaurs that are considered prehistoric on the Nile Mosaic of Palestrina alone. Do you personally figure that everyone stems from one collection of amino acids and randomly evolved from that over billions of years or do you believe Adam and Eve actually existed about 6,000 years ago or something else?

What is more of an accusation than a what if type question? Can you help provide me with evidence that I proposed something that is way off base?

RD might have suggested humans have been evolving for millions or billions of years, but what makes sense about that if humans and dinosaurs have coexisted even recently? Do you ultimately propose that everyone stems from one collection of amino acids and randomly evolved or do you believe Adam and Eve actually existed about 6,000 years ago or something else?

As far as me cleaving to deceptions? Is it not apparent that whoever is trying to control people with mainstream media and academia want people to a) believe in macroevolution and b) reject Genesis and Exodus as true history and c) reject Yahushua as Messiah? If there are deceivers who want people to live according to Genesis and Exodus and accept Yahushua as Messiah, then who dropped a ball in the 20th century?

Matthew might have been recording what Yahushua Himself actually said, but who knows what was originally said or intended?

Regardless? When is it good to criticize someone for being a fool or a moron if that's a handicap they were born with? How about we be thankful for how intelligent we are and try to refrain from putting someone else down for their intelligence even if they are less intelligent than us?

And it might be very wise indeed to be weary of trusting in man or anyone outside of the Creator personally. What am I doing myself if not being weary of trusting others including RD and what suggests to you I'm a very trusting person if I don't even accept Paul as a true apostle? I might not really even have a church or synagogue in the world I would fit in great at whether you think I'm a Ned Flanders who is stuck in some mainstream religion or not.

Do you stand by יהוה as being the Creator of the universe? If not, do you think there is an original conscious Being with another name who is? How interesting if He would have killed us for touching the ark of the covenant and yet Yahushua washed other's feet? Did the Creator come to see stuff from a weaker and more human like perspective with eyes of Yahushua? If you don't think the Creator was born as Yahushua, then who do you think Yahushua is and what do you think He accomplished?

I might have had relationships with beings very similar to RD for over eight years and had stuff come to bite me in the ass as a result. Who knows best and what is worth fearing if not the Creator of the universe? How beautiful and honest if יהוה admits to being jealous and yet is also slow to anger and quick to forgive?

What if there is a Creator and Leviticus 19:31 is something legitimate that we should honor and RD is essentially a wolf in sheep's clothing who is a fallen angel or demon? How about we love them even if that's the case, but what suggests to you otherwise?

What if there actually is some knowledge that is not good knowledge like some knowledge through demon contact and divination and some knowledge concerned with how certain individuals look naked? If there actually is a Creator who made certain rules, who are we to question them?

We might have similar perspectives on lots of stuff even if we have come to different conclusions about some stuff too. What do you make of Paul if I'm essentially a non-Pauline Messianic?

Matthew 5:22. And I didn't even read his last reply to me as a result of Garbo revealing more about what he actually was and concern about Leviticus 19:31 and more maybe. How about feel free to ask me something yourself if you wish, Creator willing.

Doesn't it seem like there is a deception within mainstream media and academia that is trying to push us away from believing Genesis and believing in Yahushua as Messiah if you look at trends and what is generally promoted? How suspicious if there's a novus ordo seclorum referenced on US dollar bills next to occultic symbolism associated with freemasonry and Egypt?

http://archives.nd.edu/cgi-bin/wordz.pl?keyword=novus+ordo+seclorum

Is Trump really free from corrupt influence himself if he got married pretty recently with Clintons at his wedding? What's not ultimately a charade? And what suggests to you that Francis is free from corrupt influence himself if something suggests that?

What do you make of Luke 4:5-6? Did Yahushua really ask reptilians to leave already whether He will do so one day or not?

Thanks for standing up for me with love if you are. Aren't we brother and sister one way or another? I first came into communication with non-humans several years ago and have been quite close with multiple and am not as Ned Flanders like as one could imagine perhaps. :) How about we consider Jeremiah 17:5-10 whether you agree with me personally or not? How telling if NASA is a transliteration of Hebrew that has to do with both lifting up and deceiving?

http://classic.studylight.org/desk/view.cgi?number=05375

http://classic.studylight.org/desk/view.cgi?number=05377

I might actually be a person who was into witchcraft in the past and who grew up in more of a new age and native american and eastern religion influenced type family than a big time church going one even if I did try to start studying religion in general and it led me towards being a non-Pauline Messianic Jew or something like that.

Garbo said something like RD has their mind binded to a human and can go back and forth between two bodies and I'm not sure that it would not be disrespectful to the Creator for me to carry on conversation with them as a result of Leviticus 19:31 and more and I have already felt consequence of being friends with possessing spirits in the past and I'm not real sure what RD said to me in a latest reply as a result of what Garbo said maybe. Is there something you or another ask of me? How about we love each other whether we agree on everything or not and trust the Creator 100% and be real careful when it comes to trusting anyone else.

How would you theoretically know they were telling the truth? Might be cool if they addressed stuff I asked and held off trying to threaten me.

Don't you think it's dangerous to be put absolute trust in anyone other than the Creator?

I was close friends with someone much like RD for like 8 years myself and he had a very similar personality with a lot of sway over people maybe, but what has actually been addressed if RD has avoided several things I asked and tried to threaten me with force or something like that? What does doing something like that really prove?

Where do you live and where are some photographs of you if you're in your own body?

How about help me figure out what I'm missing if you've provided little to nothing in terms of evidence for Akhen being Moses outside of trying to linguistically link names as different as Panehesy and Phinehas?

Phinehas might have actually not even became a high priest until decades after the Exodus in days after Israel crossing over into land of Israel and have little to nothing to do with Egypt.

It is an established linguistical fact.

According to who?

Do you claim that nephilim were taken out of existence in days before Moses? Where do you claim Hyksos fit in and who do you claim persecuted Israelites as a Pharoah in days of Moses and chased Israelites across the Red Sea?

I might have never even kind of claimed He did something just to impress humanity. Where do you claim dinosaurs fit in if historic literature and artwork suggest they coexisted with mankind even recently?

Threats that you will fucking broom me and run me aground? Does it make you upset if someone does not automatically trust you and tries to use common sense and reason with you? How about you be blessed whether you try to assault me or not, Creator willing.

What does he claim to be if not a reptilian alien?

What do you make of Daniel? Did you consider a post here in detail?

https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/6i4ib8/does_daniel_hint_of_a_future_deception_involving/

Daniel might have warned people about an end times deception concerned with aliens masquerading as good guy elohim or something like that. What do you make of new age channelers if there are people like that with very similar messages to RD?

Ahken was a nephil maybe. Consider pics that portray him and compare with stuff here and stuff toward bottom of a page here? Old blog with disclaimer on page one and some broken links and stuff should be considered in context perhaps.

Do you think all reptilians have good intentions towards us or do you think some do and some don't? There might be freemasons who will claim to be monotheists, but what's really better than atheism if you read Morals and Dogma? I'm more frustrated with RD than you and I responded to you kind of as if I was responded to them maybe. How about we try to love everyone even if we think they are deceptive though. And how about you have a great 2017 and beyond. You might be interested in following some conversation here.

You say you're an alien reptilian with a divine mission and not a fallen seraph? Where do you live and where are some photographs of you holding up some AMA related signs if you're in your own body?

I'm basically a non-Pauline Messianic who treats a Star of David like a hexagram abomination and you're a bigger fan of Zionism and Noahide stuff and Pauline doctrine than I am maybe.

What does Phinehas have to do with Panhesy even linguistically if you consider it a profound piece of evidence that Moses was a giant nephil Pharoah? Do you yourself claim that nephilim were taken out of existence in days before Moses despite Numbers 13:33? And what's really the result of billions of years of cosmic evolution if there are animals considered prehistoric on the Nile mosaic of Palestrina and on a multitude of examples of ancient art?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nile_mosaic_of_Palestrina

http://s8int.com/dinolit1.html

Can I ask why should I or anyone else trust you if you have a message that tries to positively link yourself to Yahushua and Moses while being more in line with new age channelers and Aliester Crowley and Alice Bailey than Yahushua and Moses?

If you just used nephilim as if it was not a plural word, how much sense would it make for me to trust you on origins of Abrahamic religion?

Where do you think Numbers 13:33 fits in if you are essentially trying to claim that Moses himself was a giant nephil Pharoah with an elongated head?

Reptiliandude: How about consider Luke 15 and don't let enemies of יהוה or hypocritical Churchians or even yourself convince you that He loves you less than He really does or make you think you have less hope in Him than you really do? Are you sure Luke 15 is not focused on you and that you yourself are not a very beloved prodigal son?

garbotalk: If you are a human being who is channeling a seraph or reptilian, how about reach out to the Creator one on one and reject channeling them. What does not include Leviticus 19:31 if יהוה is good and Moses was given a good law?

"19:31 Regard not them that have familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards, to be defiled by them: I am YHWH your Elohim."
-Leviticus 19:31 (RNKJV)

There might indeed be a corrupt government coming that embraces things known as Noahide laws, but what is not part of a huge end times related deception if you consider stuff here in detail?

"24:21 And it shall come to pass in that day, that YHWH shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth."
-Isaiah 24:21 (RNKJV)

Nephilim is a plural word and they are referred to in Numbers 13:33 well after an Exodus crossing maybe.

You might be referring to a Pharoah who tried to keep children of Yisrael from leaving Mitsrayim and mixing him up with Moses. Consider Tut if that's his son? Tut might be an example of a first born male who was killed as a result of Pharoah trying to keep children of Yisrael from leaving. How much sense would Numbers 13:33 make if Moses himself is a giant nephil with an elongated head?

Daniel might hint of a future deception involving fallen angels masquerading as benevolent aliens or something like that.

https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/6i4ib8/does_daniel_hint_of_a_future_deception_involving/

Interesting universe or what? Do you suppose that humanoids with two eyes and a nose and a mouth and four limbs evolved from amino acids on two separate planets that are light years apart? Could it be that יהוה really exists and humanoid is a form designed by Him because it's an awesome avatar for inhabiting three dimensional space?

You actually claim to be a seraph or reptilian yourself?

How about consider Luke 15 and don't let enemies of יהוה or hypocritical Churchians convince you that He loves you less than He really does or make you think you have less hope in Him than you really do.

Consider an option C here if you want to talk evolution? What if it's true to an extent and yet there's not universal common descent stemming back to one collection of amino acids? What does the fossil record say if Stephen J. Gould himself said The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology? If there's a degree of gradualism commonly attributed to Darwin that's virtually nonexistent in the fossil record and there are glaring gaps that led to people like Gould rejecting phyletic gradualism and grasping punctuated equilibrium instead, then what should that tell us?

Microevolution occurs and actually happens quite rapidly perhaps. How many dog breeds existed 500 years ago? There might be animals considered prehistoric on the Nile mosaic of Palestrina and very many examples of ancient art in general. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nile_mosaic_of_Palestrina

Where do you feel Moses and Yahushua/Jesus fit in?

How interesting if there's a perfect place for a legitimate Exodus crossing that we can view with a satellite viewer for ourselves here? What's not especially interesting if there are bones and chariot wheels found there and there was even a column put there in ancient time that refers to Egypt, death, water, pharaoh, Edom, the Creator, and Solomon?

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/red-sea-multi-3.jpg

http://www.arkdiscovery.com/red_sea_crossing.htm

What do you consider yourself to be?

Can you elaborate and help me understand if I'm basically a sub newbie?

Can you elaborate and help me understand if I'm basically a sub newbie?

What if there is actually a Creator who is in control and who has a good plan even if there is a host of high ones on high who are kind of treating us like bunny slaves for a time being?

"24:21 And it shall come to pass in that day, that YHWH shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth.

24:22 And they shall be gathered together, as prisoners are gathered in the pit, and shall be shut up in the prison, and after many days shall they be visited.

24:23 Then the moon shall be confounded, and the sun ashamed, when YHWH of hosts shall reign in mount Zion, and in Jerusalem, and before his ancients gloriously."
-Isaiah 24:21-23 (RNKJV)

"25:7 And he will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the vail that is spread over all nations.

25:8 He will swallow up death in victory; and the Master YHWH will wipe away tears from off all faces; and the rebuke of his people shall he take away from off all the earth: for YHWH hath spoken it.

25:9 And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our Elohim; we have waited for him, and he will save us: this is YHWH; we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation."
-Isaiah 25:7-9 (RNKJV)

What do you make of nephilim if you have done study concerning them? There might be quite a bit of details related to Genesis 6:4 provided in 1 Enoch and Jubilees even if they are generally suppressed by media and academia. See them listed as high as #3 and #6 here even if they are generally suppressed among churches and synagogues? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_Scrolls#Biblical_books_found

Would it make a lot of sense that humanoids with two eyes and a nose and a mouth and four limbs would evolve from amino acids on two separate planets that are light years apart? Could there be a Common Designer and some aliens who are actually angels created directly by the Common Designer?