11 comments

[–] 12358L 3 points

I love you Garbo

[–] garbotalk 3 points

🕊

[–] explorer1357 3 points

Back off punk, i love her more

[–] garbotalk 1 points

😄

[–] garbotalk 3 points

George Soros has exerted influence world wide toward his goal of a one world government, led by the elite over the people of this world. He calls it "globalism". I call it world domination by Soros and his ilk.

In this nation, George Bush advocated a "new world order". “We have before us the opportunity to forge, for ourselves and for future generations, a New World Order. A world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, rules all nations. When we are successful–and we will be–we have a real chance at this New World Order. An order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping forces to fulfill the promise and vision of its founders.”

It sounds nice, we will stop bullies, but what if we're the bullies? What if the leaders of this new world order seek only profit (like from oil) rather than the well being of the people?

Here's a bunch of quotes on the new world order by leaders in the world. Prepare to shudder.

https://endtimesprophecyreport.com/2013/06/05/new-world-order-37-quotes-on-the-new-world-order/

Bill and Hillary Clinton got in on this globalism too when they created the Clinton Foundation. It was established with the stated mission to "strengthen the capacity of people in the United States and throughout the world to meet the challenges of interdependence."

Again, it sounds sort of positive, wanting to strengthen interdependence, but in reality, how would that work? Would we have to descend in order to lift those less fortunate up? What if they hurt themselves by accepting criminals to lead them and steal from them? If we are tied to them through interdependence, won't we both sink? Better for some to rise when others fall than the whole world to drop together. Otherwise, who is left to help pick anyone up?

Obama fully supported globalism, but admitted in a speech to the United Nations, "In order to move forward, though, we do have to acknowledge that the existing path to global integration requires a course correction. As too often, those trumpeting the benefits of globalization have ignored inequality within and among nations; have ignored the enduring appeal of ethnic and sectarian identities; have left international institutions ill-equipped, underfunded, under-resourced, in order to handle transnational challenges."

He was right about these severe problems with globalism, yet endorsed it anyway.

Biden follows Soros and his globalism as well. In 1992 he wrote "How I Learned to Love the New World Order”
in an article for the Wall Street Journal, April 1992.

Democrat or Republican, it doesn't matter. Both groups have been deeply influenced by billionaire atheist and elite George Soros to try to unite the world under one government. The problem is, what if that one leader is a sociopathic profit seeker who lives to control the world by proxy through bought and paid for, corrupt elite? We'd all be screwed, because who could stop him?

For every Constantine, there's a Caligula. Today, those who suffer under an evil ruler at least have the opportunity to escape to another nation, or seek help from another nation to overthrow their evil leader.

That's what WWII was all about, remember? What would happen if the whole world fell under an evil dictator for life, or a proxy "united nations" as inept and ineffective as our current one?

Globalism=new world order=one world government led by elites over the rest of us. Lords and serfs, that's what Soros wants.

A one world government is the start, followed by disarmament, followed by Consortium rule. We must not let that happen.

Humanity thrives under competition. We are motivated to learn and grow in order to gain advantage for those we are loyal to, like our family, our church, or our nation. It's part of our evolution. How would we compete under extreme control of a one world government filled with laws designed to empower the elite off the labors of the 99%? We would quit trying, that's what. If there is no hope of personal or national advancement, innovation will cease. Complacency will replace it.

And then, we will be ripe for chipping, followed by overwriting. That is the ultimate goal of the Consortium that seeks to rule us all by any means necessary. It's so much easier for them if they convince us to give away our autonomy through embracing globalism.

RESIST!

P.S., Soros, an admitted atheist, wants to manipulate and affect our churches too, and he's succeeding.

http://capstonereport.com/2019/09/13/the-george-soros-funded-transformation-of-evangelical-churches/33029/

[–] [deleted] 1 points

[removed]

[–] [deleted] 1 points

[removed]

[–] [deleted] 1 points

[removed]

[–] 5nordehacedod 2 points

I think those are pretty bold words considering that they had such power, underground networks and media propaganda at their disposal and still lost in 16. O-man was rootin-n-tootin in their corner and the old smoke and mirror ballet tricks over the last decades just were not enough. I mean their candidates were blatant naive criminal scum thinking their shit didn't stink that bad. The public may be dumb but they can still smell bullshit. Their best chance is 2024. Unless Ivanka runs then or 2028 or something. . . Hint hint.

[–] garbotalk 2 points

What's important to me is not the party, but having a candidate free from the thumb of the Kayeen. For Republicans, it is Trump. For the Democrats, it is Tulsi Gabbard.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/tulsi-gabbard-says-she-wants-213820125.html

We must stop involving our military in regime changes overseas while neglecting our people back home.We don't need globalism=new world order=one world government with us as the international force. Becoming drawn into another world war is not in our best interests. It's time to end U.S. involvement with continuous wars that cause suffering and resentment against us all in the name of oil profits. We need to quit fighting each other and fight against the Kayeen chipping agenda. They can't overwrite us without a chip.

[–] ACuriousHumanBeing 1 points

I wonder. Are all of these parading of political buzzwords like socialist, alt-right, centrist, democrat, republican, antifa, tea-party so on and so forth only helping to distract us and keep us spinning in circles? Maybe not intentional...but who lets a good tragedy go to waste...