Local old.reddit-style archive. No login, no quarantine splash, no new Reddit.
555 posts · 8935 comments
First ever photo of particle entanglement (sciencealert.com)
submitted 2019-08-14 by garbotalk
[–] garbotalk 10 points 2019-08-14
The "spooky action" of particle entanglement, as Einstein described it, has been photographed for the first time. Initiating entanglement has been discussed for quantum computing for some time, but it can do so much more. It can literally let us speak in real time across any distance! Please, physicists, pursue this technology. Pulse the Fibonacci sequence and answer the beacon with hydrogen molecules entangled across the universe! Aim it at the sun and let humanity's voice be heard by all the sentient life beyond our planet! "Strum the strings" rather than smack particles together as you do now. They can be stimulated from a distance. Try it!
[–] ACuriousHumanBeing 2 points 2019-08-15
Holy shit.
It looks like an eye.
[–] wraith_tm8 1 points 2019-08-15
https://cnet4.cbsistatic.com/img/OFWiBxXf7UckiFNRkA9S0bTnTxQ=/756x567/2019/04/10/075a09a0-cbdd-46d0-aae7-529aff76ed1a/a-consensus.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin_and_Yang
[–] ACuriousHumanBeing 1 points 2019-08-15
I actually thought of that same symbol. 🌗
[–] velezaraptor 4 points 2019-08-16
They used fraudulent photons, and the whole hyperboloid is missing.
What did they do to cause the missing half?, it’s almost like a negative photo. Maybe to provide the perspective of angle?
Here is crude representation of a complete “photon” better well known as a coaxial circuit.
https://imgur.com/gallery/NN32Phw
If we follow electrical theory, there are no photons to be found, but electrostatic energy comes from completing the circuit.
“Static electricity is generated whenever two materials are in contact with each other. All materials are made up of electrically charged atoms. In the universe there are equal amounts of negative electrical charge (electrons) and positive charge (protons). These generally stay in balance at every location.”
This theory regarding these types of particles in particular is in question.
How do I stand here and say science is lying to us about what particles do? I would have to say this hinges on a similar pendulum as what RD tells us and why.
Gatekeepers are there for a reason, and in their diligence, they appear fierce and have many of men.
So I say to you and to all a good night, remember somewhere someone has the answers, and they may be willing to share, but how do we know who’s telling the truth?
Dig deep and think on it, see what motives they might have to lie. Never cry conspiracy until you have the evidence in your pocket, but wear the badge to seek the truth to the end.
[–] explorer1357 2 points 2019-08-16
Good shit bro
[–] rdubya3387 1 points 2019-08-16
Not doubting what you are saying, I am new to this, just curious, how the heck do you know that and what it should look like lol? Are you in the scientific field?
[–] velezaraptor 3 points 2019-08-16
Hi,
Let's start at the beginning and work our way forward.
Have you read any of these author's books?
Oliver Heaviside
Oleg D. Jefimenko
Charles Proteus Steinmetz
Nikola Tesla
Is the only person on the list you know is Mr. Tesla?
Is there anyone alive who can help explain and prove the falsehoods taught to us: Ken Wheeler.
Electron? False
Photon? False
Other types of particles? Yes.
[–] rdubya3387 2 points 2019-08-16
Thanks! Further down the rabbit hole I go! Appreciate the author's for me to check out!
So, this is good news! Question though, how come this research isn't shutdown/buried by the greys? Are they not allowed to? Just saying, that seems like unplugging the telephone line for someone trying to make a phone call that you don't want out...
[–] garbotalk 10 points
[–] ACuriousHumanBeing 2 points
[–] wraith_tm8 1 points
[–] ACuriousHumanBeing 1 points
[–] velezaraptor 4 points
[–] explorer1357 2 points
[–] rdubya3387 1 points
[–] velezaraptor 3 points
[–] rdubya3387 2 points
[–] rdubya3387 1 points