11 comments

[–] [deleted] 1 points

[deleted]

[–] garbotalk 1 points

Yeah, he's been working against nations with gold backed currency instead of fiat currencies he can control.

Putin threw out the Rothschilds from Russia and Soros is not welcome.

http://katehon.com/article/purging-russia-evil-rothschild-money-changers

If only the U.S. would stand up to these money lenders led by Kayeen.

[–] exicleus 2 points

I know of a particular nation right now that just did a fresh deal with Russia. It includes both gold and oil. I wonder why US wants to get involved with military action in Venezuela.

Is it truly for their people?

US didn't care to intervene years ago when the Venezuelan people started eating the flamingos in their own zoo and killing each other over toilet paper.

[–] garbotalk 2 points

War never seems to actually be about helping people these days, particularly in war.

[–] reptiliandude Reptilian 5 points

This is quite conceivably the best thing you've ever written as far as the way in which economic power is wielded.

I really wish that people would up-vote such articles more.

I just don't understand why it has to be pointed out how important such a simple thing is.

If any of you saw how many times the votes go up and then back down not because of differing opinions, but because of concerted efforts on the part of suppressives, you'd hit that up button every time.

​

​

[–] garbotalk 3 points

Thank you for your encouragement, always.

[–] emperorbma 1 points

If I said "compare George Soros and National Socialism," would anyone else truly get it? I shall not say more lest I trigger the bot patrols.

[–] garbotalk 2 points

Centralized Banking-->Rise of Merchant Class-->Buying Politicians-->Stripping Rights-->Loss of National Resolve-->Economic Dependency-->Control of Population-->Mandated Chipping

[–] emperorbma 1 points

I’ll put it this way: Soros took everything Nazi and changed its target from Jews to Gentiles.

[–] pospi1811 1 points

Jews always say that they are the safest in multicultural and open societies where they can easily blend with the rest of the population so their behaviour is less visible. Im not kidding this is what many zionist jews say. In homogeneous society they are much more easily sniffed out hence why they were kicked out of 109 countries and still counting. Muslims will invade your country while Jews will move in and subvert it. I like the Muslim approach. I like it when my enemies openly declare their goals. Honesty is the best policy.

[–] pospi1811 1 points

People like Soros are globalists. They believe in open society which is the opposite of nation states. They view nation states as opressive and outdated. What they are trying to do is transform humanity and human nature itself. Open society would need a totalitarian regime for it to work in any meaningful way because humans would naturally revert back to tribalism. Humans are naturally tribalistic animals we evolved living in tribal setting for thousands of years and nation states were just natural extentions of that (family=tribe=nation). Even before Columbus arrived in America Native Americans were already forming tribes or empires and the same pattern could be seen all over the world throughout all of human history. There is no instance of a truly open society anytime in human history. So technically what Soros and other crazy globalists want to achieve goes completely against human nature and its ultimately bound to fail as we are seeing in Europe.